68
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

These animals are just existing.

Claiming we have a right to murder them for being in the wrong place is cruel - they have only spread there as a result of humanity.

Do we have a right to eradicate humanity in turn?

[-] Facky@hexbear.net 27 points 6 months ago

Humans can change their behavior and protect nature. Other invasive species cannot.

[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So we have a right to murder innocent animals because we, the most destructive species in history, have deemed them ā€œinvasiveā€?

[-] Facky@hexbear.net 20 points 6 months ago

Do we have the right to stop a forest fire simply because we deem it dangerous?

[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

Having the same moral value for a fire and living creature is wrong.

You can do a million things other than kill them to fix the problemā€¦ but killing them is cheapest, so thatā€™s whatā€™s done.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13690 readers
268 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS