68
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net 29 points 11 months ago

Invasive species will lead to ecosystems being further destroyed. do you have any fuckin clue what you're talking about?

[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It’s a moral consideration this isn’t a fucking logic problem.

I don’t value ecosystems, but I do value animal lives. Unsure how I could be wrong about that on a moral level.

If a pack of dogs was loose in a forest; I would not kill the dogs, for example.

[-] AdlachGyfiawn@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Don't be silly. All moral considerations are logic problems. Theory without praxis is immaterial at best and concern trolling at worst.

And ecosystems are made up of a sum of lives, animal and otherwise. Their collapse inherently kills animals. There is no moral superiority in allowing deaths by inaction.

[-] LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago

If the pack of wild dogs was eating every single deer and you wouldn't kill the dogs, you do not value animal lives.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13929 readers
734 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS