68
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It’s a moral consideration this isn’t a fucking logic problem.

I don’t value ecosystems, but I do value animal lives. Unsure how I could be wrong about that on a moral level.

If a pack of dogs was loose in a forest; I would not kill the dogs, for example.

[-] AdlachGyfiawn@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Don't be silly. All moral considerations are logic problems. Theory without praxis is immaterial at best and concern trolling at worst.

And ecosystems are made up of a sum of lives, animal and otherwise. Their collapse inherently kills animals. There is no moral superiority in allowing deaths by inaction.

[-] LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago

If the pack of wild dogs was eating every single deer and you wouldn't kill the dogs, you do not value animal lives.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13539 readers
707 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS