16
Nancy Pelosi continues to exercise ultimate power over Democrats
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
16 points (59.5% liked)
News
23275 readers
1384 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Ultimate power sounds kinda nefarious. Seems to me like she's doing a hell of a job, currently. I don't have any particular love or hate of her, but her job has got to be like herding cats, and she clearly does it will.
Deservedly so. She didn't get where she is by NOT currying favor with and doing the bidding of the ultra-rich and their corporations.
Nah, her job is to receive and carry out the wishes of the owner donors. That's why she originally supported Biden staying in: the wealthy patrons were still on his side. It was only when THEY started pulling their support that she used her power to oust him.
If her job is to carry out someone else's wishes, then she doesn't really have "ultimate power". It's just like, penultimate power, best case.
Dammit, that's actually a good point lol. She's mostly a vessel through which even richer, even more powerful, and even more corrupt people exert their will on the public.
She's damn effective and brutal about it, though, making her chief amongst corrupt middle managers.
Yeah, Democract elites, they suck, blah blah.
They do. As do Republican, third party, and politically neutral elites.
In a system specifically designed to reward greed, ruthlessness, and authoritarian tendencies, you don't get to be one of the elites without being an awful person.
It does seem inevitable in the systems that we have built that you eventually sell out.
Only if your greed and lust for power are stronger than your higher principles.
You can fight the system, even from the inside, without selling out, but they won't let you pull the levers behind the scenes unless you're much more rich and/or powerful than it's possible to become without selling out.
For an easy and obvious example, see Bernie Sanders. He's stood behind his principles from the day he was born and never sold out to anyone. He's a beloved figure across the whole country and a huge percentage of Americans supported his run for president.
He has next to zero power, outside of using his established position to shame other politicians. If you're immune to shame, he can do nothing.
From a cynical perspective, you've described how all politics works in every system. Make peace with it.
No. Only the most corrupt politics, of which Pelosi is a chief proponent.
Corruption is unacceptable, especially on the scale of the likes of Pelosi and most if not all Republicans.
Politics are NOT as corrupt in every system and even if it was, that would be something to fight to change, not "make peace with" like a good little slave.
What are you going to do about it? Money and power dominate every system. Monarchy. Feudalism. Communism. Democracy. Even anarchy is rolled by the person with the biggest guns.
Anarcho-capitalism? Sure. Left anarchism? Nope, only according to the deliberately misleading establishment narrative 🙄
There is no organization of people, from a marriage to a nation, that can't be unbalanced. Someone always has influence (wealth, power, knowledge) that can be used corruptly or violently to take from another.
Yeah yeah, the world is unfair and we're all powerless to influence anyone so we should just give up now 🙄
Isn't it exhausting to go through life with such an utterly defeatist attitude?
No. I just worry about the things I can change and not the things I can't.
Sounds dreadfully utilitarian and limiting.