1889
Coca-Cola Taxes (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yemmly@lemmy.world 58 points 3 months ago

Did you know it doesn’t even have cocaine in it anymore? What a ripoff!

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Coca Cola ensured that international drug laws grant them an exception to use real coca leaves (with the cocaine extracted from them first). Oddly enough, they could still make their cola taste the same without the leaves. The reason they still use them is because they likely wouldn't be allowed to call it "coca" cola if it had no coca leaves. The name was so recognizable that they asked for an exception to drug laws rather than change the name of their drink.

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The other reason is they make a good profit selling medicinal cocaine.

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Branding is one helluva drug

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Sounds like an excuse to extract cocaine to me

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

Eh, works for me. BRB, making a new product called coca tea, for the... uh... tea.

[-] Fish@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago

When did they quit putting cocaine it? If I'd known that then I wouldn't have been buying it anymore!

[-] yemmly@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Around 120 years ago, give or take

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
1889 points (99.5% liked)

People Twitter

5303 readers
1437 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS