410
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Biden’s voice was strong and clear, and the crowd was far warmer to him as an outgoing president

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 208 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The debate was a one-off for Biden, and that's the way the cookies crumble.

Trump said the Dems were doing post-birth abortions.

Biden had a raspy voice.

Who was destroyed by the media?

[-] darkpanda@lemmy.ca 112 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Howard Dean said “yeaaahh!” strangely that one time and that was it for him. It doesn’t take much.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 55 points 3 months ago

Because our media is shit

Biden really was visibly too old. But they’re also pretty good at ginning up issues literally out of nothing when they want to.

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

The media still haven't realized that they're a bunch of highly educated puppies. They write well and can form a compelling story, but at the end of the day they get distracted by, and tend to focus on, any flashy or squeaky object in their periphery.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure you're talking about two different groups of people inside "the media" there.

[-] booly@sh.itjust.works 29 points 3 months ago

That's confusing cause and effect. Howard Dean's speech was supposed to be a concession speech after losing the only early primary/caucus he was trying to win. He poured in all of his resources in the hopes of winning Iowa, underperformed expectations against a backdrop of dropping in the polls for weeks, and coming in third (with no real prospects for New Hampshire or South Carolina) basically made it impossible for him to have the volunteers, money, or press coverage to survive into the next stage of competing in bigger states with primaries clumped up together.

He showed everyone his plan of winning Iowa or going home, lost Iowa, and then gave some kind of rallying speech as if he had a plan to recover from that loss. He never did, and it wasn't the scream that killed his campaign. His campaign was dead before the scream happened. It's just that the scream was a particularly memorable way for a campaign to die.

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Big pet peeve of mine when people attribute his decline to the Dean Scream. The scream was the final nail in the coffin.

[-] machinaeZER0@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Yeah, but y'see - that's way less funny

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

people didn't like that scream?

That's a pretty rad scream.

EEeeYEAH-HyeeuuUH!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwkNnMrsx7Q?t=50

[-] cabbage@piefed.social 19 points 3 months ago

There's a lot of fragile people out there who can't handle things like rad screams, dijon mustard, or women's right to self-determination.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

but that's the trifecta...

oh, you mean weirdos.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 11 points 3 months ago

Back when the internet was fun, there was a flash game where you could play as the different presidential nominees, and Howard Dean's special move was the "Dean Scream" where he would scream flipping back and forth from left to right, and all the enemies on screen would fall down. Top tier.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

that sounds awesome. the Dean Scream.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Don't forget that we voted for Bush because people would rather have a beer in their back yard with him than with Kerry.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 95 points 3 months ago

That's a pretty generous summation of the problems with Biden's debate performance. It was also hardly a one-off. Every time Biden appears it's a coin flip for which Biden shows up, which is why he appears so infrequently.

You are absolutely right about how Trump's bullshit gets largely ignored by the press though.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Remember that Biden has a stutter. It's a condition that has no cure and can only be managed.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 3 months ago

Nobody has forgotten the stutter.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

It was hardly a one-off. He was setting off alarm bells left and right beforehand, and the debate was his chance to regain some confidence. And he had a bad night then as well. So yah, he has his good days, but it's pretty apparent that his good days are getting far between.

This was the right decision, it's a shame he had to be pretty much forced into it by everyone else that saw it. I blame his handlers, and they should have their asses handed to them for trying to fuck the rest of us by keeping him past his best-before date and giving Trump the presidency.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

Biden had a raspy voice.

Biden said we finally beat Medicare.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 months ago

It blows my mind that “Biden just had a raspy voice!!” isn’t banned as misinformation here. Because it literally is, there is no reasonable way to interpret “we beat Medicare” being yelled over and over as the result of a raspy voice. Absolute memory hole shit.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

My favorite bullshit excuse was when they pretended it was jet lag when he hadn't been on a plane in two weeks.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

I remember Jon Stewart: "How big was that jet?!?"

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

I was intrigued to find out last night what he meant to say.

"We finally beat Big Pharma."

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

That's a big brag for "we lowered prices on a handful of drugs... for Medicare recipients only."

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Apparently universal healthcare (AKA Medicare for All, single-payer) is some kind of glass ceiling for Democrats. You have to reject it in order to get nominated. Hillary reversed her position on it; so did Harris.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago

What else could he have meant?

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

I might not be steeped enough in politics to immediately be able to parse the sentence with the word swap. I do like to think I’m usually pretty good at finishing somebody else’s sandwiches but drew a blank with that line.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

The debate was a one-off for Biden

Bullshit.

Biden had a raspy voice.

I really thought we were past the gaslighting that the only thing wrong with Biden was a sore throat. But here we are....

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

He was also getting hammered on Gaza. Over 650,000 Democrats voted "uncommitted" in the primary.

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
410 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3343 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS