895
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DragonAce@lemmy.world 328 points 1 year ago

Why are these assholes so against helping people? These fuckers are nothing but greedy sociopaths.

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 195 points 1 year ago

conservatives view social hierarchy as a necessity which must be enforced. if you’re at the bottom, you deserve to be there, and if you’re there, you suffer because you deserve it, and because you’re at the bottom, you deserve to suffer. cruelty is the point, and without it, there can’t be the joy of their success.

anything else, to them, is profane and must be fought/destroyed. anyone who tries to climb above their position must be punished.

relevant videos:

The Alt-Right Playbook: Always a Bigger Fish

Endnote 3: The Origins of Conservatism

[-] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A Conservative is someone who can't enjoy their dinner without knowing someone else is hungry

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

I'm stealing that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lawdoggo@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

The only thing baffling about any of this is that somehow, millions of ordinary, working/middle-class Americans believe that this system benefits them more than the alternative.

[-] Invisinak@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

it's not baffling at all. the American dream is literally everyone is a millionaire or will be one day. conservatives are the only ones buying into that dream still so they're trying to live like a millionaire now so that when the money finally shows up they've done their part to help their new millionaire friends along the way.

The problem is they don't understand that the likelihood of them becoming even moderately wealthy is pretty slim and they're too blind to see that voting to hurt the poor is voting to hurt themselves in their current situation.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When I was growing up, at least the way I was taught (and I was only born in 1977), the American Dream was a steady paycheck, a house and a car. Did that change at some point or was I taught something other than what people actually believed?

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

As someone also born in '77 I generally heard the same things and the same sentiment. Though I think that might have more to do with family and the general class you grew up in. Because it isn't Universal unfortunately. Nor can capitalism deliver on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah, they're just pissed and want to believe they've been wronged by some "other". Ironically, they're 100% correct, but have identified the wrong "other". Baffling, indeed.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

But voting another way will result in my children being accosted by drag queens who will turn them gay / trans and my freedoms will be co-opted by shitty beer companies who don't believe in Christ. Then my enemies will take my guns and my elderly parents will be shipped off to a commie gulag and murdered to make room for more whatever whatever whatever… I ran out of tropes. Hopefully, you don't need me to punctuate that this is sarcasm.

These are the things that they think about obsessively. They aren't thinking about how to make the world a better place. They're thinking about the things they hate and fear.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 20 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/agzNANfNlTs

https://piped.video/E4CI2vk3ugk

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl 19 points 1 year ago

I've always regarded that episode of the playbook as especially astute.

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

the whole “Playbook” is pretty great, bit this one is excellent for explaining exactly why conservatives see things the way they do

[-] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Which is quite a high bar, considering the overall quality of the whole series!

[-] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the links. They were very enlightening.

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 12 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/playlist?list=PLJA_jUddXvY7v0VkYRbANnTnzkA_HMFtQ

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] unconsciousvoidling@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago
[-] 432hz@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

That's the No True Scotsman Fallacy.

This is just Christianity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

"I'm not getting debt relief, so why should they" is their only argument. They're just greedy.

[-] Bizarroland@kbin.social 43 points 1 year ago

And many of them got covid bailouts and never had to pay a penny back and do not think even for a moment that their actions are hypocritical

[-] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

And we literally have congress critters that lived on ~~welfare~~ debt relief programs and want to tell others to pull themselves up by the bootstraps.

[-] cassetti@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

I don't need student debt relief, it won't affect me. But I am extremely for it - it's called wanting a better life for your fellow human being.

Compassion - it's not a difficult concept if you're not a narcissistic a$$hole.

And as an added bonus, the money currently going to banks would actually get better distributed to businesses (both big and small) and act as a net gain to our economy. But screw that - we don't want some bank stocks to dip and affect some wealthy pension plans! /s

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

My family is financially secure and has no student debt. I, too, am for student debt relief, in part because it benefits me directly. When my neighbor has an extra $100 in his pocket to spend at the local shop, that benefits me, too. "Conservatives" (just what in the fuck do they conserve?) are too stupid to see this.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I was blessed with my parents saving a lot and saving early for my college, and I fully support student debt relief. I honestly don't understand how it's possible for someone to be lucky, see the vast majority of people to be unlucky, and not want all of them to be helped out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They’re just ~~greedy~~ asscunts.

[-] brimnac@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

If people can organize instead of work overtime…

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Along with the usual "the cruelty is the point" responses, I'd like to remind people that this is a direct strategy championed by Mitch McConnell, who has been championing this strategy long before Biden came along.

First, McConnell believes that the GOP should not have any policy positions on anything at all. If you have a policy position, that position is subject to criticism. Rather than champion policies that he fully admits would be unpopular with the voters, McConnell believes in simply pointing to the Democrat policies, pointing out the flaws in those policies, and just making vague promises that the GOP can do better without actually defining how. Ever seen the meme of the guy tapping his own head while saying something profoundly stupid? That's exactly what this is. Picture McConnell doing that while saying "Can't be criticized for your terrible ideas if you just don't have any ideas at all!"

The other part, also championed by McConnell and others, is that no matter what it is, if it originally was a Democrat idea, then a Republican must be against it at all costs. Not only must they be against it, they must treat every Democrat policy as a threat to American society as we know it. Take a look at Romneycare in Massachusetts. A healthcare bill created by a Republican that was considered widely successful and basically the cornerstone to Obamacare. But the second a Democrat suggesting nationalizing the program, it was suddenly the worst program in the world that would collapse our healthcare system and lead to death panels.

And sad to say, but it's been a very effective strategy for them. It's easy for the GOP to get their voters to blame Democrats for problems because deflecting blame is easy, and people are always looking for someone to blame for whatever problems they have in life. People tend not to do their own research or critical thinking and often just prefer to be "told" what the "right" answer is, especially if what they're told jives with their own personal worldview. If voters want to believe that Democrats are the root of all evil, and their elected leaders are saying that Democrats are the root of all evil, it's not much of a stretch to get them to believe that anything or any ideas associated with Democrats are also evil and must be eradicated.

It's all about maintaining political power through obstruction. Doesn't matter how bad your own policies are just as long as you continue to make sure voters believe that the alternative is even worse.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

This is extremely well said. Thanks for taking the time.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

When you view life as a zero sum game it turns you into a real selfish cunt.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Because either they got theirs and fuck everyone else. Or, they never got theirs and fuck everyone who might get theirs.

[-] cassetti@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

They've become so focused on political "points" and afraid of the other "team" scoring a "point" that they're willing to do anything, regardless of the optics.

Because they don't stop and look at the bigger picture - it's just political capital they can push around or dangle as a carrot in front of voters for future elections.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Because Ronnie RayGun said it is dangerous for government to help people. Totally cool for government to help those poor billionaires though.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Totally cool for government to help those poor billionaires though.

Well, Elorn bought Twatter and can't afford to pay rent (or severance, or server fees, or lawyers), so it seems right that he should get a handout. How's the guy even gonna pay for his next lunch?!

Meanwhile, my grandmother can't afford insulin. That bitch better figure it out!

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Wilholt's law, "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Aka, "you're not hurting the right people"

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago

“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.”

― John Kenneth Galbraith

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sounds like libertarianism TBH.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

Two sides of the same coin these days.

Conservatives seem to mostly be libertarians that have realised they can use single-issue voter, crazy church shit to get themselves elected.

[-] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're libertarians when it comes to them being able to do whatever they want, and they're fascists when it comes to things they don't want to do. Has actually nothing to do with political philosophy, it's just naked short-term self interest. (They don't even care if something will be bad for them in a few years.)

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

*Wilhoit's. I remember because I used to have a neighbor named Wilhoit.

[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Because the corporations that own the private colleges and universities that overcharge on tuition also are the ones that hand out student loans.

They stand to lose billions of dollars in predatory profit if they can't collect interest on student loans.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If only there were some loopholes to close and a way to take a little cash from assets that never ever get sold…

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] KammicRelief@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Because it hurts college-educated people. Culture war.

[-] Vlhacs@reddthat.com 10 points 1 year ago

Simple answer I think is GOP don't want anyone in their base to think any form of government assistance is good and will always label it as hand outs. More government assistance/social safety nets means their capitalist overlords gets to maintain and build their control over citizens and money will flow to them instead. Also "liberals bad!"

[-] Countsheep@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

They get mad about feeding starving kids too

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
895 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3343 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS