145
submitted 3 months ago by git@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 44 points 3 months ago

Still, researchers say that individuals should try to reduce their exposure by avoiding the use of plastic in preparing food, especially when microwaving; drinking tap water instead of bottled water; and trying to prevent the accumulation of dust, which is contaminated with plastics.

doomjak

The Food and Drug Administration says in a statement on its website that “current scientific evidence does not demonstrate that levels of microplastics or nanoplastics detected in foods pose a risk to human health.”

The American Chemistry Council, which represents plastic and chemical manufacturers, did not directly respond to questions about the recent studies finding microplastics in human organs. Kimberly Wise White, a vice-president with the group, noted that “the global plastics industry is dedicated to advancing the scientific understanding of microplastics”.

The ACC seems unhinged with their responses to research and news about microplastics with all of the responses being some form of "nuh uh"

[-] PaX@hexbear.net 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

drinking tap water instead of bottled water

doomjak

Ahhh I get to choose between the lead and the plastic, very cool

Maybe I should try that boiling thing

I genuinely don't know if I wanna live anymore

[-] ryepunk@hexbear.net 23 points 3 months ago

Why not boil in a plastic bottle so you get the best of both worlds!

[-] PaX@hexbear.net 19 points 3 months ago

shatter

Those are phthalate crystals precipitating out of my skin after I try this

[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago

Point of use/under cabinet R.O. or whole house water filter is going to be the only way to ensure safe drinking water going forward.

They can be had somewhat cheaply, for single faucet dispensing.

[-] PaX@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

~10 dollars in my fake app bank acct, overdrafted in my "real" bank acct cat-vibing

Will look into this if I ever have money for safe water to drink

I love being alive during the era of late capitalism, I love thinking

[-] Dingus_Khan@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago

It doesn't eliminate PFAS chemicals though doomjak

The entire watershed of the town I grew up in has contaminated water from a DuPont plant, provably going back to the 80s. Discovered about a decade ago, absolutely no government action done to mitigate it. For a year or two after the proof came out the county provided free water bottles, then literally nothing. Several hundred thousand people are daily drinking contaminated water out of taps that cannot be remedied at the point of use and the state and local government just continues to shrug

[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Reverse osmosis very much removes PFAs from drinking water. There are other ways besides RO for reducing/removing pfa’s

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 30 points 3 months ago

lmao:

No, Microplastics Are Not The “New Acid Rain.” Not Even Close.

Sensational and ominous headlines such as “Plastic rain is the new acid rain” are in no way based on science. Microplastics are not acidic, and they don’t act like acid rain. In fact, the World Health Organization and others have noted that, while microplastics are present in the environment, existing evidence indicates they don’t pose a risk to human health.

Interestingly, the report referenced found the amount of microplastics in the environment represents only four percent of particles collected on average – and in some cases much less. The other 96 percent is comprised of natural materials like minerals, dirt and sand, insect parts, pollen, and more.

That's right, only 1/25th of small solid particles in the environment are plastic! We gotta get those numbers up!

Also, hilariously, every time you copy something from the web page, they embed a little "Learn more at: https://www.americanchemistry.com/chemistry-in-america/news-trends/blog-post/2020/no-microplastics-are-not-the-new-acid-rain-not-even-close"

Like sure, I'll happily link the rest of the screed because it has to be seen to be believed, don't worry.

[-] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 29 points 3 months ago

No, Microplastics Are Not The “New Acid Rain.” Not Even Close.

Correct, we actually did something about acid rain

[-] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 20 points 3 months ago

Akshually sweatie plastics are not acidic so you can't say they're like ACID rain.

Checkmate tankies

[-] gueybana@hexbear.net 15 points 3 months ago

I think that sentence was by far the dumbest shit I’ve read in weeks.

[-] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago
[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago

microplastic and its consequences really have been a disaster for the human race

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 24 points 3 months ago

The Food and Drug Administration says in a statement on its website that “current scientific evidence does not demonstrate that levels of microplastics or nanoplastics detected in foods pose a risk to human health.”

uhhhh is there tho? we've had many discoveries of microplastics being in places and things, and like duh new things should not be added to bodies and environments without knowledge of their implications. but there is very little concrete about what it's actually doing.

[-] DefinitelyNotAPhone@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago

Yeah, there's not any evidence I'm aware of yet that micro plastics in the body do much of anything. That's not to say that it doesn't, just that whatever it might do is not so dramatic that we're able to immediately tell.

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago

and unfortunately it's crucial for this information to be found out before places like the FDA can make a standard. they can't just guess and risk that being too high, and until we have realistic mitigation strategies it's a joke to say "none"

[-] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago

Oh sick, good to hear

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
145 points (100.0% liked)

news

23574 readers
799 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS