691
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bambam@piefed.social 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Could shutting down the government somehow be an election stealing tactic by Republicons? How would that impact the government's ability to ensure fair elections.

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago

The elections are run by the states, not the federal government. Congress keeps working during a shutdown. I can't see how it would hinder the election.

It would have unpredictable effects on the election though, so I can't imagine they really want to risk it.

[-] aphlamingphoenix@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah, the elections get operated at the state level, but don't you still need an employed VP to count/register them?

[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

When the "government shuts down" the elected officials still all work.

Even some federal employees still work. There are core essential functions that have to continue or people may die, government property may be destroyed, etc. Those people all work--without any support staff.

They just won't receive a paycheck until the shutdown is over.

The military continues to work. Federal law enforcement continues to work.

The reality of a government shutdown is that it's actually very expensive and almost entirely performative (from the politicians perspective). Nothing good comes from it. It's literally one of congress's only jobs-- so they just look more incompetent than usual.

The federal agencies spend a lot of time and effort preparing for possible shutdowns that usually get averted at the 11th hour. When they don't it's incredibly expensive to deal with the impacts of delayed programs and contract issues, handling leave/time off during that timeframe etc.

Another impact is that it can drive top talent away from the government (potentially by design from certain political dispositions). Would you work somewhere that doesn't pay you or delays paychecks?

That said, I don't thing government employees have officially missed a pay check yet though. Like I said it's all bullshit. They get to the brink then "figure it out". The one a few years ago was the closest people got to missing paychecks. The solved it the day before the official pay date.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Another impact is that it can drive top talent away from the government (potentially by design from certain political dispositions). Would you work somewhere that doesn’t pay you or delays paychecks?

Of all the reasons I avoid working for the government this is pretty far down the list.

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

On January 6, yes, but they don't stop working. The shutdown only affects the rank and file government employees that do things like run the government agencies, air traffic control*, Smithsonians, etc.

*Air traffic controllers would be considered an essential function, so they would actually get the joy of continuing to work without pay, until a budget is passed, then they would get back pay. (There's also a possibility of some agencies having money, for various reasons, to continue to pay essential employees.)

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Most will just work and wait for the pay, that's what happened last time anyway.

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Essential people will, but non-essential people will not work.

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
691 points (97.8% liked)

News

23608 readers
3426 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS