63
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago

In the discourse, a heckler's veto is a situation in which a party who disagrees with a speaker's message is able to unilaterally trigger events that result in the speaker being silenced. For example, a heckler can disrupt a speech to the point that the speech is canceled.

How is Vance - despite his being a well educated idiot - not describing a heckler's veto?

[-] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 37 points 1 month ago

I've never heard this term before, but I think the key phrase is "party who disagrees with a speaker's message." Presumably, the people calling in bomb threats are on the same page as Vance, so they're not hecklers, and any pressure on Vance to stop is an unintended side effect. If people were calling in bomb threats to Vance's rallies, that'd be a heckler's veto.

Ultimately, though, who the fuck cares. Jesus Christ, libs are insufferable.

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

Oh, okay, I wasn't following the fact that the bomb threats were also coming from his camp.

[-] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

Oh, I thought people were calling bomb threats to Vance so it was a heckler's veto.

I was so confused reading this.

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
63 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13489 readers
1109 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS