279
Maths rule (files.catbox.moe)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 59 points 1 day ago

It's just an edit of this meme

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 day ago

several alphabets, in fact

once you run out of Latin letters you start using Greek, Hebrew, Fraktur, etc

[-] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 10 points 23 hours ago

I like using Japanese kana in my homework. I'm learning the language, and it helps with calming down after the rage of "what the hell is this thing, that doesn't make any sense???"

As a result, i have to prove that the set ใพ is open.

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 22 hours ago

I like that! I should start using Kana or cursive Cyrillic in my derivations to mess with the professors

[-] SandmanXC@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Wait till you hear about the sickos using arabic numbers

[-] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago

The woke mind virus strikes again. I use English numbers like 7 LIKE A REAL AMERICAN ๐Ÿฆ…๐Ÿฆ…๐Ÿฆ…๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

/s incase it wasnโ€™t obvious

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 11 points 1 day ago

Or fancy letters, like the L in a Laplace transformation.

[-] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 1 points 8 hours ago

Also a good way to start an essay

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago

And if that's not enough, you just straight up make up new symbols, like Nabla

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

Ah yes, because other science fields like linguistics would never just grab random letters and turn them upside down to repurpose them!

[-] Poik@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

ษ™ษ™ษ™ษ™... What do you mean? /j

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)
[-] Poik@pawb.social 1 points 18 hours ago

Any upsidedown A in the set of all real characters used in academia would immediately illicit mathematical memories.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 16 hours ago

Did you mean ALL the upside up A?

[-] Poik@pawb.social 2 points 15 hours ago

Nope, it means "for any" as in no matter which one you choose it will be correct.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 14 hours ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_quantification

I usually used it as "for all", but its looks like "for any" is used too

[-] Poik@pawb.social 1 points 7 hours ago

I sit corrected. It's used as an arbitrary singular value within the proof, so for any always felt more appropriate.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
279 points (95.1% liked)

196

16247 readers
2294 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS