83
submitted 1 month ago by PortoPeople@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago

Yeah, expected bullshit cuz Forbes, but the psychologist actually knows what they're talking about about.

Doesn't outright say it, but the "problems" are all outdated shit boomers insist on keeping around because it's what they're used to.

Like, "face to face communication" not only isn't important now, it hasn't been for a long fucking time.

Even when you need to talk to someone one on one to figure something out. IM gives you a record of what was discussed to refer to

If I've got 20 things going on and someone wants a face to face or even a call, I'm very unlikely to remember the details a day later. IMs or emails, I can go back and get all the discussed info in like 2 minutes.

We're asking these kids to do shit that was outdated before they were born because the people in charge are at best in their late 60s and still are scared of computers.

They're just pissed life passed them by and the skills they have are outdated.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 36 points 1 month ago

I love the ability to keep a perfect history of my communication, which IM/slack/email gives you, but if you have a complex issue to solve that requires the input of multiple people, face to face conversation can get to the bottom of the issue many times faster than back and forth messing. Not only can you speak quicker than you can type, but you can convey additional information in tone of voice and facial expression.

And I hate to praise AI for anything, but it's not half bad at given you a written summary of what was talked about.

I say all this as someone who really doesn't enjoy talking to people face to face, and would much rather just send messages.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not only can you speak quicker than you can type,

I'm not exactly "young" anymore but I can type on a keyboard waaaaay quicker than I can speak.

But the article is specifically talking about "face to face". Getting a couple people to jump on a Teams call to sort something out isn't something impossible for Gen Z.

They just don't like the "face to face" bullshit that comes with working in an office.

I'll take a team meeting online on a call over having to do it in person, everyone show up early, and all the distractions that come with an in person meeting. It just wasted time for "socializing" with people you don't want to socialize with. Co-workers don't need to be friends, and definitely aren't family.

Gen X and Y are the same, it's just Gen Z is the first to be overwhelming raised by those two generations.

X/Y can put up with it because we grew up with people like that.

For Gen Z it's literally like having to put up with their grandparents bullshit, something they only had to tolerate infrequently, and recent graduates just went thru years of distant learning.

So they know all the "face to face" shit is extreneous

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Most english conversations are conducted at 110-150 words per minute, unless you're a 1% level typist (or have a speech issue) you can definitely talk quicker than you type.

[-] Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

This is true, but on the other hand, no one can really interrupt you typing, and reading is faster than listening, so depending on the group it may still be more efficient.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
83 points (85.5% liked)

News

23397 readers
1827 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS