40
submitted 8 hours ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 7 hours ago

Yes, any kind of business. Including using their banking system. Do you not understand how disastrous this was and remains to be to Cuba's ability to trade with the world at large or are you being willfully obtuse? Are you aware of how the US attempts (often successfully) to enforce the sanction on other countries? Again, if you seriously think it's as simple as you put it you need to educate yourself. Here's a start:

The Helms-Burton Act has been the target of criticism from Canadian and European governments in particular, who object to what they say is the extraterritorial pretensions of a piece of legislation aimed at punishing non-U.S. corporations and non-U.S. investors who have economic interests in Cuba.

The United States has threatened to stop financial aid to other countries if they trade non-food items with Cuba. The U.S.'s attempts to do so have been vocally condemned by the United Nations General Assembly as an extraterritorial measure that contravenes "the sovereign equality of States, non-intervention in their internal affairs and freedom of trade and navigation as paramount to the conduct of international affairs".[133] Academic Nigel White writes, "While the U.S. measures against Cuba do not amount to a blockade in a technical or formal sense, their cumulative effect is to put an economic stranglehold on the island, which not only prevents the United States intercourse but also effectively blocks commerce with other states, their citizens and companies."

There's a reason every human rights group and their mother has criticized the embargo and it's not because it's just "one country won't do any kind of business with you".

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago

The Helms-Burton Act. That's really what we're citing. Jesus fucking Christ. Do you know anything about the execution of the act, or did you just skim wiki for whatever looked good?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 6 hours ago

I mean I know about the results of the act, and the blockade in general. And they're... the state of Cuba for the past 60 years.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I mean I know about the results of the act,

The results of the act being some international mockery and a couple of failed domestic lawsuits enabled by the act, which has been intermittently suspended as a diplomatic tool anyway.

and the blockade in general.

Fuck's sake. You do realize what an actual blockade would look like for Cuba, right?

And they’re… the state of Cuba for the past 60 years.

Oh, here I thought it was grotesque economic mismanagement combined with utter dependence on Soviet subsidies to keep their sluggish economic system going. Subsidies, naturally, which stopped existing in the 90s, though things weren't great before that either.

Perhaps you should read up on the Cuban government's management of cattle on the island, once the second-largest industry in Cuba.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 6 hours ago

Fuck's sake. You do realize what an actual blockade would look like for Cuba, right?

Yes, things could be worse. They're still bad.

I'm not saying Cuba is competently running their economy, but an incompetently run economy doesn't lead you to the modern state of Cuba. Why are you so intent on ignoring how the US prevents their citizens, and discourages those of other countries, from doing trade with Cuba? Plenty of countries trade with Cuba, including the US itself, but that's all despite US influence. The idea that the US is just not doing business with Cuba is patently false.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yes, things could be worse. They’re still bad.

In the same way that describing an unauthorized border crossing as an invasion because it "could be worse" but is still "bad". Words have meanings.

I’m not saying Cuba is competently running their economy, but an incompetently run economy doesn’t lead you to the modern state of Cuba.

Oh. It doesn't? I can name plenty of modern states doing worse than Cuba by their own efforts, without any US opposition. Do you know how easy it is to ruin an economy with total control over the government and nearly no private industry?

You wanna explain to me how one of the foremost countries for cattle in the Americas turned into a net importer of dairy products? Or how emergency measures passed for a hurricane in the 1960s which hobbled the Cuban cattle industry weren't lifted until the 20 fucking 20s?

Why are you so intent on ignoring how the US prevents their citizens, and discourages those of other countries, from doing trade with Cuba?

'Discourages' being an apparently very weak stick considering Cuba's current trade relations.

Plenty of countries trade with Cuba, including the US itself, but that’s all despite US influence.

Okay, so the argument, then, is that without the US's influence, Cuba's economy would be... where?

What industry is currently being hobbled to such a degree that it is crippling the nation by American influence?

What industry in Cuba is reasonably functioning?

What industry in Cuba is not being exploited to a significant degree because it can't find buyers or sellers?

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
40 points (95.5% liked)

News

23190 readers
2906 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS