734
submitted 9 months ago by Dot@feddit.org to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Cool, so it’s fine if Mark Cuban does the same thing for the Democrats, right?

Right???

[-] perishthethought@lemm.ee 50 points 9 months ago
[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 54 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Of course he’s not, it’s a hypothetical question. It would be election interference if the Democrats did it.

The Republicans, however can ostensibly do whatever the crap they want without repercussions as the FEC looks on with their head all the way up their own sphincter.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

The FEC knows if they tried something SCOTUS would shut it down in a second.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

~~Idiots~~ Right-wingers will assert that George Soros is, no evidence wanted or needed.

[-] MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network 2 points 9 months ago

Total coincidence they picked someone Jewish for their conspiracies about bankers secretly controlling the world.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 22 points 9 months ago

I see articles like this stating he has donated $0 and doesn't intend to contribute anything. He also calls out Musk for what he is doing.

According to OpenSecrets.org, which tracks campaign financing, Cuban last donated to a candidate in 2002, when he gave $1,000 to Democratic California Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren's campaign.

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Of course, since most of the internet can't detect sarcasm, you're getting down voted.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Haha, oh well. As long as a few people see the obvious hypocrisy I’m trying to point out in our system. What does the FEC even do if not this kind of stuff????

[-] perishthethought@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

If "most of the internet" misunderstands you, then you need to work on your communication skills.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago

Lemmy especially cant detect sarcasm, but then again im convinced that about 40 percent of Lemmy is autistic or clone enough.

[-] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I'm real!

And so am I!

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
734 points (99.2% liked)

politics

25120 readers
831 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS