195
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

THANKS VERY COOL GOOGLE I'LL JUST LET THE PLAGIARISM MACHINE THAT TELLS PEOPLE TO EAT GLUE AND BURNS DOWN THE RAINFOREST TO DESIGN MY CURRICULUM

ACTUALLY WE PROBABLY DON'T EVEN NEED TEACHERS WHEN WE CAN JUST SIT STUDENTS DOWN IN FRONT OF A CHROMEBOOK AND FEED THEM AI SLOP ALL DAY AND THEN THEY CAN USE AI TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS

screm-aAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Edie@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago
[-] mar_k@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

i'm unironically in a uni class where our weekly discussion posts (ie have to write 3 short paragraphs a week) are graded by AI. professor says the system should give full credit if it can tell what you're saying has some substance and is relevant to the weekly text, but it often seems like when i write something original it gives my reply a C and when i say anything buzzwordy and devoid i get an A

[-] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

This is malpractice. Disgusting

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

The results it gives will be based on the patterns of the training material. If your response says a lot of the common words that the A* essays in its training material commonly use then it'll give A*. If it doesn't have a lot in common with them then it won't.

You can probably write literal garbage that a human being can't read but get an A* from the machine because it sees a lot of the same words that are in high graded training papers.

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
195 points (99.5% liked)

chapotraphouse

13551 readers
721 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS