The U.S.: Where there's more brands of peanut butter than there are major political parties (hexbear.net)

submitted 3 weeks ago by Guamer@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just seems funny how we have so much "choice"...except for where it actually matters

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] miz@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

hope you don't mind me pasting in the reference

Li: At the moment, the Chinese the party state has proven an extraordinary ability to change. I mean, I make the joke: “in America you can change the political party, but you can’t change the policies. In China you cannot change the party, but you can change policies.” So, in the past 66 years, China has been run by one single party. Yet the political changes that have taken place in China in these past 66 years have been wider, and broader, and greater than probably any other major country in modern memory.

Pilger: So in that time China ceased to be communist. Is that what you’re saying?

Li: Well, China is a market economy, and it’s a vibrant market economy. But it is not a capitalist country. Here’s why: there’s no way a group of billionaires could control the Politburo as billionaires control American policy-making. So in China you have a vibrant market economy, but capital does not rise above political authority. Capital does not have enshrined rights. In America, capital — the interests of capital and capital itself — has risen above the American nation. The political authority cannot check the power of capital. That’s why America is a capitalist country, and China is not.

from https://redsails.org/china-has-billionaires/

[-] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

I like to phrase it this way. In America the market is a wild animal. A coyote that is opportunistic and feral. In China is is domesticated. A dog that is kept leashed. And should it become feral it will be put down.