987

Anon questions our energy sector (slrpnk.net)

submitted 6 days ago by MataVatnik@lemmy.world to c/science_memes@mander.xyz

389 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

Yes it can. Pretending it's that dangerous in doses normally consumed by humans in say coffee would be silly though and that's exactly what you are doing. Like you could make a dirty bomb from spent fuel rods, but that's irresponsible. You could build outdated and unsafe reactors, but again that's irresponsible. You could also burn people to death using the power of the sun and some mirrors. Do you get my point?

[-] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago

doses normally consumed

So we can just put an much caffeine into a person as we want because it's ok in normal dosages? That's wrong. Your analogy sucks. You can't discount danger because of normal conditions. Tsunamis weren't normal for Fukushima. Do you understand?

Do we get to ignore things that get labeled irresponsible? Plus, if there's been a hundred incidents, that pretty much says we aren't and cannot be responsible enough to prevent them.

Your points aren't worth arguing further. I will not be engaging anymore. Feel free to continue to think that your analogies are clever; I will not.