106
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 100 points 12 hours ago

Making trans people with combat knowlodge unemployed for a transphobic reason doesn't seem like a good idea.

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 58 points 10 hours ago

chuds in the US military will never do something good, there's a whole thing about homeless "veterans", never saw them revolt

[-] grendahlgrendahlgen@hexbear.net 39 points 10 hours ago

The Bonus Army did, and the feds gassed them in the middle of DC.

[-] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 19 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Bonus Army was filled with ex-conscripts. Modern veterans were all volunteers, so they are bootlickers or selfish opportunists at heart without any type of solidarity. They lack the ingredients for an uprising

[-] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 3 points 4 hours ago

People can be radicalized within the service, like Aaron Bushnell.

But absent conscription I don't think the armed forces are fertile grounds, which is an absolute shame.

[-] tripartitegraph@hexbear.net 14 points 10 hours ago

Lol beat me to it

[-] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 6 points 7 hours ago

Besides WW1 vets. Many post-vietnam vets turned in far-right terrorists. Oklahoma City bombing is an example of this. I guess the only recent cool veteran was Chris Dorner.

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 6 hours ago

It's as stupid as expecting SS officers to be leftist revolutionaires post WWII, no mf

[-] Leon_Grotsky@hexbear.net 5 points 6 hours ago

Even then Chris Dorner was more Cop than Troop and was upset about other cops being racist to him more than anything.

[-] tripartitegraph@hexbear.net 28 points 10 hours ago

We actually did have unemployed (a lot of homeless as well) veterans revolt back in 1932 during the Great Depression, demanding early payment of their service bonus certificates.
About 43,000 of them camped with their families on the White House lawn for a while, and the president at the time, Herbert Hoover, sent tanks and bayonets in and they killed a few people and injured dozens. Patton led the charge and Eisenhower wrote the military report endorsing the action (though he claims he told Patton not to do it). It was called the "Bonus Army" if you want to do some more reading.

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

1932, that's older than Joe Biden Also it's ignoring an important part, most U.S. army members aren't from poor families anymore, most can afford not killing kids for a job.

[-] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 18 points 7 hours ago

They were also conscripts from WW1, not volunteer mercenaries who joined up with glee to kill Muslims

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 14 points 9 hours ago

Some of them were also suspected of being involved with the Business Plot, which would have ushered in a Nazi dictatorship. Luckily they approached the wrong general to carry out the plot, but the plan was to use the Bonus Army to do it since they found enough sympathizers to go along with it.

Who knows, though. Had they approached officers in charge of the Bonus Army directly, maybe they would have been rebuffed all the same.

[-] tripartitegraph@hexbear.net 5 points 9 hours ago

That's wild, I've never heard this side of the story!

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The general they approached was Smedley Butler (I forgot to mention). He wrote War is a Racket, which you've probably heard of or read.

[-] HamManBad@hexbear.net 38 points 11 hours ago

On the other hand, it seems like a tactical victory for communism

[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 27 points 11 hours ago

at the very least a great opportunity for agitprop

[-] SwitchyWitchyandBitchy@hexbear.net 28 points 11 hours ago

I hope any of them with good opsec manage to leak a whole bunch of classified information on their way out.

[-] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 25 points 10 hours ago

We have Chelsea Manning, but what about Chelsea Manning 2

[-] Guamer@hexbear.net 9 points 10 hours ago

Second Manning

this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
106 points (100.0% liked)

news

23571 readers
664 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS