[-] Steve@communick.news 2 points 6 hours ago

Haven't been able to find a copy of Big Shark by Tommy Wiseau.

[-] Steve@communick.news 1 points 7 hours ago

I've always said, you get a 100% discount on what you don't buy.

[-] Steve@communick.news 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

No idea. Wherever is part of my index mutual fund.

It's just wrong when people complain about the cost, and roll in all the optional snacks and stuff as though they just automatically have to buy them. It's easily possible to spend half as much or less. Nobody to blame but yourself if you choose to buy all the extras.

[-] Steve@communick.news 1 points 10 hours ago

Absolutely agree

[-] Steve@communick.news 2 points 11 hours ago

That's what I did.

This Silicon Carbon battery chemistry I've learned works different Lithium Ion. SC likes to be charged to 100%. So I've been fully charging each night on a slow 15W charger. So far so good.

[-] Steve@communick.news 1 points 13 hours ago

It is ridiculous. But the logic is the same. Which shows the flaw in the logic.

[-] Steve@communick.news 3 points 14 hours ago

The extra popcorn and candy was always overpriced even in the 80s. That's why I never got any as a kid. Nothing has changed. Ticket prices have even pretty flat for a decade now.

[-] Steve@communick.news -2 points 14 hours ago

If it's only a few times a year (or once every few years), then the expense shouldn't be worth complaining about. That truly is a special event.

[-] Steve@communick.news 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

My 7000mAh lasts 2 days most of the time.
That 10000mAh should go 3 days

[-] Steve@communick.news 5 points 15 hours ago

Redmagic 10 Pro

[-] Steve@communick.news 7 points 16 hours ago

Mines got a silicon carbon battery with 7000mA. It's very nice. Most days I don't get below 50%.

[-] Steve@communick.news 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Until Servo is ready. I have some high hopes for that one

2

To my mind, Ban has always meant permanent.
"You're banned from this place! You'll never be allowed in again!"

While I've always thought of Suspend as being temporary.
"You're being suspended from school for 1 week, over fighting."

Ban:

  1. to prohibit especially by legal means
  2. bar entry

Suspend:

  1. to debar temporarily especially from a privilege, office, or function
  2. a: to cause to stop temporarily
    b: to set aside or make temporarily inoperative
  3. to defer to a later time on specified conditions
  4. to hold in an undetermined or undecided state awaiting further information

When I hear someone mention they were banned my reaction is: "Holy shit! WTF did you do to earn that!" Then I find out it was only for a day or three: "Oh... That's not a Ban! That's minor. Go touch grass. You'll be fine."

I've been banned from subreddits and communities a few times. At least once I never even noticed because it was so short.

How is it a Ban if I didn't even notice?

Why did Ban in online forums and games, come to mean temporary?

Is it simply an example of the intensification of language? To make something mundane, seem more severe than it is?

Does it bother anyone else? Or am I alone here?

104

I'm genuinely curious about peoples thoughts on this.

It made sense for a while. But the branding change was 16 months ago. The URI change was 3 months ago. Everybody knows now what X is. Yet for some reason, I still see in news stories today:
"... on X — formerly known as Twitter — and said ..."
I really don't think that's needed anymore. But I'm always one to want changes as fast and painless as possible.

So what do you think would be an appropriate amount of time to keep reminding everyone that Twitter is now X?
Months?
Years?
How many?

530

Kagi AI summery:
Cards Against Humanity (CAH) is suing SpaceX for allegedly taking over a plot of land on the US/Mexico border that CAH purchased in 2017 to prevent the construction of Trump's border wall. CAH claims it maintained the land but SpaceX later moved construction equipment and materials onto the property without permission. The lawsuit seeks up to $15 million in damages to restore the land and cover losses, and also requests punitive damages. CAH says SpaceX never asked for permission to use the property and never apologized for the damage. The lawsuit includes before and after photos purporting to show SpaceX's use of the land.

And CAH's website all about it

view more: next ›

Steve

joined 2 years ago