And that's different from their previous situation how? They apparently did not have a plan for that, either.
So, why were they fine fighting Assad and Erdogan, but are not fine fighting against Erdogan and the DAESH government?
They could have rejoined Assad's state instead of applying with NATO, then They didn't.
What changed in their situation that made joining in on a genocide okay when staying with the Syrian state was not okay before?
What were they planning to do to begin with, then?
Cool. I guess every socialist project should just ally with the US and fight all of the other socialist projects. Down with international solidarity, up with helping the Imperial Core keep its hegemony! /s
Now the PRC remains with much diminished allies, having assisted in the ruination of Afghanistan, driving Vietnam away, and with NATO still being the dominant force in the world.
I still don't understand how anybody can defend the foreign policy of the PRC at the time.
Meanwhile Dump literally talks about killing people in the street
Meanwhile, Harris has been doing that throughout her career and also promises to do more of that.
While in parliament, she championed a total ban on the use of Russian language in Ukraine
When your party's name is 'Freedom'.
Turns out, dragons are kind of cool.
Even funnier, Yandex CEO fled to Israel after the SMO started
Citing the fact that she does not want to live under a state that exhibits aggression to its neighbours, no less.
What was their plan for the end of the civil war before? Did they intend to be the ones to conquer Syria on behalf of NATO?