I saw Trudeau march in Toronto pride circa 2017. Probably the biggest 'celebrity' I've seen in person. He had a popemobile of 8-10 huge security dudes around him trying to look as plain-clothed as possible (as cops, not paraders) with huge duffel bags around their shoulders (rifles). It was cool to see him there, I understood the security, but I also got a bit of a chuckle out of the security trying to conceal themselves as people who happened to be in a parade but seemed oblivious to it - against him in a colourful shirt smiling and waving at everyone
A strange thing to use as a positive example
Yeah that's a red flag for this person doesn't know what they're talking about and/or doesn't have popular interests at heart to some degree. Good catch!
Right on!! Like you, I HATE spam. And the thought that I'm helpless to receive unwanted corporate communication makes me a little nutty. To that end, I've found email filters to be really helpful when all else fails. I use protonmail but I imagine other email applications have something similar. As soon as I get one unwanted email, I create a new rule: based on the sender's email address and/or subject line keywords - instantly move all current and future messages to trash and mark as read. Out of sight out of mind
I agree with the Nobel Laureate in economics, Joseph E Stiglitz, who wrote this.
Of course, when the most profitable companies in the world don’t pay their fair share of taxes, it just shifts the burden on to others.
Apple was so successful in avoiding taxes in Europe that it is estimated that it paid in some years a tax of just 0.005% on its European profits.
Not just a headline. Funny read!
“This kind of despicable affront never would have happened if we were granted all of the journalist spots on the campaign,” noted Ezra Levant of Rebel Media. “We would only ask decent questions, like ‘Is it true that Justin Trudeau is the antichrist’ and ‘Mr. Poilievre, how did you get so handsome?'”
Great article. Nice to see an economist doing such important work. I don't really understand finances. I snipped the parts of the article that helped me understand the finding/headling. There's a great chart in the article of taxation differences since the 1960s too - staggering! Plutocracy in action!
Published in The New York Times with the headline "It's Time to Tax the Billionaires," Zucman's analysis notes that billionaires pay so little in taxes relative to their vast fortunes because they "live off their wealth"—mostly in the form of stock holdings—rather than wages and salaries.
Stock gains aren't currently taxed in the U.S. until the underlying asset is sold, leaving billionaires like Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Tesla CEO Elon Musk—a pair frequently competing to be the single richest man on the planet—with very little taxable income.
"But they can still make eye-popping purchases by borrowing against their assets," Zucman noted. "Mr. Musk, for example, used his shares in Tesla as collateral to rustle up around $13 billion in tax-free loans to put toward his acquisition of Twitter."
Shrinkflation noobs. Never specify the size of a (pseudo-)prepared product. It's better to use abstract terms like large, extra large, and jumbo that can be shrunk down in size without increasing legal liability down whenever you wish to juice your profits a bit (/s)
Definitely not genocide /s
Defunding biodiversity science at a time like this...
Removing downvoting feels intuitively wrong to me (eg, I believe that dissent is a really important part of a healthy democracy). If all those mega-corp platforms are removing downvoting, then I'm pretty confident my intuition on this matter is correct
Low bar, but agreed