[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That's fair, though I also think it's fair to criticize the use of BMI and acknowledge all of its flaws. Perhaps mr givesofmefucks is just stating this position but with harsher wording.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

So you also agree that studies point that BMI doesn't work very well in diagnostics? Because you're replying the statement with a boldened sentence agreeing with gp.

Or perhaps was the point that it's not true that "it doesn't really mean shit now" since the BMI still has some usefulness at the population level?

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

BMI is a somewhat valid indicator of health for most members of society, which makes it a reasonable population health metric.

That's a half truth to some extent. Muscle mass isn't the only thing that fumbles the BMI math. The calculation is also notoriously less useful for women in general, and for black/latino women specifically even more misrepresentative. And even outside those groups BMI isn't really a "reasonable" health metric by today's standards. But it ins't totally useless either, so I guess it depends on what we mean with "reasonable".

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm with you aspirationally but this is just a beaverton benign joke on language purists, nothing to be so angry about

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Indeed I don’t disagree, I think it’s worth experimenting with this and driving fines look like a good place to start

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'm in agreement that we need systemic solutions, and those involve improving road design, so we agree for the most part on the most important aspect of this.

punishing people for being successful.

But issuing bigger fines for breaking the law is very, VERY far from punishing people for being successful. It's a correction of an unfortunate truth: if you're wealthy, you can afford to drive recklessly.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

What does the top speed of a car has to do with how safe it is to go 10 km/h over the posted speed limit?

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

So let's push for that instead of pushing to remove cameras. In fact, proportional fines would probably increase the revenue, which would bring the funds to improve the road design so folks don't get the wrong impression of the speed they're supposed to be in. Also let's push for better transit so poor people are not forced to drive and risk getting fined.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

doesn’t feel fair

Why? Why does it feel unfair to follow the speed limit?

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

If only we had real world data showing that there are several examples of speed cameras having a positive effect on driver behavior... Even if it was "just a cash grab", it's still a productive thing to do, as it can be used to fund the infrastructure changes of actually designing roads to their desired speeds.

it’s literally just a tax on poor people

I was the only one on the road, and in a sports car that can go like 100 in second gear

lmao ok

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

JFC, a new low for The Walrus.

I donate monthly, but will pause my donations for the rest of the year and I sent them an email explaining why. I hope this partnership costs them dearly, though of I course I hope they survive it and learn the right thing from this.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Maybe some day in the distant future our policy-makers will understand that updating a few signs doesn’t make a damn difference.

Yes it does, even if compliance is low, and the reason is what you yourself is saying

You need physical speed reduction methods such as speedbumps, roundabouts, raised crosswalks, etc.

Traffic engineers won't do these road diets on 50km/h streets. Changing the speed limit is an important first step that enables further changes to road infrastructure to help enforce the updated speed limits. This sweeping change is a MAJOR victory, that has been argued for many years. That we were able to pass this for so many neighbourhoods at once is great news and should be celebrated.

This was discussed at length during the council meeting, including later in the same day where another vote was passed to update the commitments and plans for the municipal Vision Zero initiative, which are in fact going to require infrastructure projects.

7
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by villasv@lemmy.ca to c/bicycles@lemmy.ca

I've been going back and forth a few apps. Apple Maps and Google Maps fail me too often suggesting me to take streets without bike lanes. With OsmAnd I'm able to mark a few roads as "Avoid", but I end up marking half my city and sometimes I do need to go one block or two on those streets.

Is there an app that allows me to to plan a route explicitly prioritizing AAA lanes that works in Vancouver?

view more: next ›

villasv

joined 2 years ago