cross-posted from: https://lemmy.wtf/post/18485419

I follow #FediLive, #Owncast and "PeerTube" on Mastodon and have noticed a surge of new streamers on both services over the last month or so and I'm wondering if anyone else has noticed this as well?

Most of all, I'm wondering why? Was there a decrease in server costs? Have they become easier to install? Maybe it's just more people realizing that they even exists? Don't get me wrong, I'm happy to see this, I'm just curious as to why it seems to be happening in such a dense amount of time?

We tested out the new Fediverse beta in Ghost, and wrote about our initial thoughts. There's a huge amount of potential, and it's already taking great shape.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/26829044

@rimu@piefed.social will be my guest for Fireside Fedi episode 6!

Livestream: https://stream.firesidefedi.live VOD: https://video.firesidefedi.live/@show Fedicast: https://audio.firesidefedi.live/@firesidefedi

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.wtf/post/15816115

I hope this directory will help you find the PeerTube platform that fits your needs. I must say, I am a little worried how few platforms actually meet the criteria I've set. It's possible I've missed some, so please let me know in the comments. Enjoy.

General platforms

The following directory consists of PeerTube platforms (instances/servers) that fits the following criteria:

• A general platform.
• Registration is open.
• Follows (federates) at least 500 PeerTube platforms.
• Provides some amount of storage space for users.

Dalek.zone

• Link: dalek.zone
• Follows: 1301
• Storage: 20 GB (2 GB per day)
• Location: USA
• Live streaming:: Yes, with transcoding

video.4d2.org

• Link: video.4d2.org
• Follows: 987
• Storage: 20 GB
• Location: USA
• Live streaming:: Yes, no transcoding

Infosec.Exchange Video

• Link: video.infosec.exchange
• Follows: 966
• Storage: Unlimited
• Location: Germany
• Live streaming:: Yes, with transcoding

PeerTube.wtf

• Link: PeerTube.wtf
• Follows: 940
• Storage: 100 GB (20 GB per day)
• Location: Denmark
• Live streaming:: Yes, no transcoding

Freediverse.com

• Link: freediverse.com
• Follows: 744
• Storage: 500 MB
• Location: Canada
• Live streaming:: Yes, no transcoding

PeerTube.Anduin

• Link: peertube.anduin.net
• Follows: 551
• Storage: Unlimited
• Location: Norway
• Live streaming:: No

Topic specific platforms

The following directory consists of PeerTube platforms (instances/servers) that fits the following criteria:

• Registration is open.
• Provides some amount of storage space for users.
• Allows other platforms to follow (federate) it.

Please be aware that the following platforms are only recommended for content creators, as these platforms only follow a few PeerTube platforms. If you are a viewer, pick a general platform from above!

Hardlimit

• Link: video.hardlimit.com
• Topics allowed: Technology, in English or Spanish.
• Follows: 0
• Followers: 32
• Storage: Unlimited
• Location: Spain
• Live streaming:: Yes, no transcoding

MakerTube

• Link: makertube.net
• Topics allowed: Makers, musicians, artists and DIY folks.
• Follows: 60
• Followers: 67
• Storage: Unlimited
• Location: Germany
• Live streaming:: Yes, no transcoding

Spectra Video

• Link: spectra.video
• Topics allowed: Original content.
• Follows: 73
• Followers: 37
• Storage: Unlimited
• Location: USA
• Live streaming:: Yes, no transcoding

LinuxRocks PeerTube

• Link: peertube.linuxrocks.online
• Topics allowed: Technology, Gaming
• Follows: 20
• Followers: 40
• Storage: 50 GB
• Location: USA
• Live streaming:: Yes, with transcoding

You should always go to a platforms /about page and read up on the rules and the features enabled on the platform. In some cases, registration requires approval by moderators. If you are interested in streaming, also make sure to check if this feature is enabled on the platform you wish to register on.

If you want a complete list, you can take a look at Framasoft's own list.

Looks to build mastodon account and Lemmy community for my county, just curious if there's any programs that can post to Lemmy mastdon

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/57576884

There's so many ways to interact with the Fediverse. The most popular, by far, seems to be Mastodon, but Lemmy, Misskey, and Pixelfed are also relatively popular. Kbin used to be popular, but it has apparently been abandoned, and is mostly dead at this point.

I recently learned that Mbin is a thing, checked it out, and it looked really cool! Has anyone used it? How different is it from Lemmy? I hear they have better integration with Mastodon.

What Fediverse services do you actually, regularly use?

For me, it's mostly Lemmy, though I do hop on Mastodon every now and then.

cross-posted from: https://poliverso.org/objects/0477a01e-1067-cb38-c32e-95b537168187

Raccoon for Friendica is finally available on the PlayStore too. And is compatible with Mastodon and Mastodon glitch-soc

Raccoon is a free and open source mobile-first client for Friendica and Mastodon.

-:-

Friendica is an outstanding social plaftorm, featuring powerful characteristics which make it unique in the federated world:
• rich text editing, long posts, support for titles and spoilers;
• native support for ActivityPub groups;
• direct messages;
• media gallery where you can manage photos and albums;
• possibility to organize your contacts in circles;
• ability to quote (cross-post) other people's posts;
• RSS feed import;
• integrated event calendar;
• of course, much more (see the official documentation)…

The web interface is great to access all of these features but on a mobile device there are different constraints for usability and readability, so it comes in handy to have an app to use the most important functions of the platform.

Main features:

• timeline view with ability to switch feed type (public, local, subscriptions, user-made lists);
• post detail, i.e. opening a conversation in its context and see the replies, number of re-shares and people who added it to favourites;
• user detail with ability to see posts, post and replies, pinned posts and media, subscribe for notifications from a user, follow/send a request or unfollow them, see following/followers;
• support for ActivityPub groups, with the ability to open threads in forum mode;
• see trending posts, hashtags, links and following recommendations;
• follow/unfollow an hashtag and view all the posts containing a given hashtag;
• post actions (re-share, favorite, bookmark) and – for own ones – edit, delete or pin to profile;
• global search hashtags, post and users containing some specific terms;
• customize the application appearance with color themes, font face and size, etc;
• login via OAuth2;
• view and edit one's own profile data;
• view incoming notifications and filter the list;
• manage one's own follow requests and accept/reject each one of them;
• view the list of one's own favorites, bookmarks and followed hashtags;
• create a post/reply with formatted text, image attachments (and alt text), spoiler and title;
• schedule a post (and change its schedule date) or save it to drafts;
• report posts/users to administrators for content moderation;
• mute/unmute, block/unblock users and manage the list of muted/blocked users;
• manage one's own circles (user-defined lists);
• see polls (read only);
• multi-account with easy ability to switch between accounts (and, in anonymous mode, switch instance);
• send direct messages to other users and see conversations;
• manage one's own photo gallery;
• view one's own event calendar (read only).

play.google.com/store/apps/det…

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/26724528

Announcing the Blorp Mac App Preview – Available to Test Now!

Blorp is at a stage where there's still plenty of work to do, but I’m ready to start gathering feedback. The main areas that need improvement are enhancing the post creation experience and adding the ability to sign up directly through Blorp.

That said, Blorp is already very usable. I’ve chosen to launch the Mac app first because, among all the Lemmy clients, the desktop space is the least saturated. I’m starting with Mac since that’s where I’ve done all my testing, but the plan is to expand to Linux and Windows as well.

I’d love for you to download Blorp for Mac! If you’re not ready to install it yet, or you're not on a mac but still want to check it out, you can use the web version at blorpblorp.xyz.

Did I mention, Blorp is open source? You can read all the code on our GitHub.

Other platforms coming soon:

• iOS
• Android
• Linux
• Windows

La parola hacking da qualche tempo va di moda per l’incremento di attacchi informatici, che stanno avvenendo in tutto il mondo. A parte rari casi, si pensa che sia un fenomeno nato e cresciuto recentemente. In realtà affonda le sue origini già dal 1878. Engineering & Technology ha illustrato una breve panoramica di come sono nate e si sono sviluppate queste pratiche, nel corso dei secoli. I primi episodi ci sono stati a partire dall’invenzione del telefono. All’inizio i centralinisti erano giovani ragazzi, in quanto avevano già operato con i telegrafi. Questi, però si divertivano a fare scherzi e a capire più come funzionasse il sistema che a lavorare. Tanto che nel 1878 la Bell dovette cacciarne un gruppo da New York per aver ripetutamente e intenzionalmente scollegato conversazioni e collegato utenti sbagliati per gioco. Da allora la compagnia assunse solo impiegate donne per quel ruolo. Il secondo caso della storia hacking si ebbe dopo la scoperta delle onde elettromagnetiche alla fine del 19esimo secolo. Questa pavimentò la strada per il telegrafo senza fili di Guglielmo Marconi. Nel 1903 il mago e inventore Nevil Maskelyne sabotò la prima dimostrazione pubblica di John Ambrose Fleming della tecnologia “sicura” dell’apparecchio inventato da Marconi. Lo fece inviando messaggi in codice Morse che screditavano il sistema. A seguito di ciò, Fleming inviò una lettera al Times in cui chiedeva aiuto ai lettori per smascherare il colpevole del gesto. Maskelyne rispose affermando che il suo era stato un gesto per rivelare la vulnerabilità del telegrafo senza fili. La parola “hacker” ha origini antiche e, inizialmente, non aveva alcuna connotazione negativa. Nei primi anni del XX secolo, il termine si riferiva a qualcuno capace di trovare soluzioni innovative a problemi tecnici. È negli anni Sessanta, al Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), che il termine “hacker” si lega al mondo dell’informatica. Qui, un gruppo di giovani programmatori e tecnologi appartenenti al Tech Model Railroad Club (TMRC) iniziò a smanettare con i primi computer disponibili, come il PDP-1, cercando modi creativi per utilizzare le macchine al di là delle loro intenzioni originali. Non era una questione di distruzione, ma di esplorazione: per gli hacker del tempo, la tecnologia rappresentava un terreno di gioco da comprendere e sfruttare al massimo. In questa fase, gli hacker erano pionieri della conoscenza. Si prefiggevano di superare i limiti imposti dalla tecnologia, sfidando le convenzioni e migliorando i sistemi esistenti. Alcuni tra i primi “hack” documentati non riguardavano l’informatica come la intendiamo oggi, ma i sistemi telefonici. Negli anni Settanta, la “phreaking” – abbreviazione di “phone hacking” – divenne una delle prime forme di hacking digitale. Figure come John Draper, conosciuto come “Capitan Crunch”, scoprirono che soffiando in un telefono con un fischietto incluso in una scatola di cereali si poteva manipolare la rete telefonica AT&T per effettuare chiamate gratuite. Questo tipo di hacking era visto come un atto di ribellione contro il sistema, ma anche come un’opportunità per sperimentare. Con l’avvento dei personal computer negli anni Settanta, l’hacking si spostò rapidamente dai sistemi telefonici ai computer veri e propri. La comparsa del MITS Altair 8800 nel 1975 e, successivamente, dell’Apple I e II, segnò un punto di svolta. Era l’epoca dei computer a scheda singola, con capacità limitate ma sufficienti per affascinare menti curiose. Gruppi di appassionati si riunivano nei cosiddetti “computer club”, come l’Homebrew Computer Club in California, dove figure come Steve Wozniak e Steve Jobs iniziavano a plasmare il futuro dell’informatica. In questo contesto, gli hacker erano ancora principalmente esploratori e inventori. Tuttavia, la comparsa delle prime reti – come ARPANET, il predecessore di Internet – creò nuove opportunità per il loro operato. Alcuni hacker iniziarono a infiltrarsi nei sistemi non per danneggiarli, ma per studiarli. Un esempio è Kevin Mitnick, uno dei primi hacker celebri, che negli anni Ottanta diventò noto per le sue intrusioni nei sistemi di telecomunicazione e informatici. Mitnick rappresentava il perfetto esempio di un hacker che univa competenze tecniche a un’incredibile abilità nel social engineering, convincendo le persone a rivelare informazioni sensibili. Tra i primi attacchi informatici documentati ci fu il “Morris Worm” del 1988, considerato il primo worm diffuso su larga scala. Creato da Robert Tappan Morris, un ricercatore della Cornell University, il worm non era stato progettato per causare danni, ma per esplorare l’ecosistema di ARPANET. Tuttavia, un errore nel codice fece sì che il worm si replicasse in modo incontrollato, paralizzando migliaia di computer. Questo evento segnò un punto di svolta, dimostrando che i sistemi interconnessi potevano essere vulnerabili a livello globale. Negli stessi anni, altri hacker come Gary McKinnon si distinguevano per i loro attacchi mirati. McKinnon, conosciuto come “Solo”, riuscì a penetrare nei sistemi della NASA e del Dipartimento della Difesa degli Stati Uniti all’inizio degli anni Duemila. Le sue motivazioni, dichiarate in seguito, erano legate alla ricerca di prove sull’esistenza di tecnologie aliene e UFO. McKinnon portò alla luce il concetto di hacker etico o idealista, qualcuno che utilizza le proprie abilità non per guadagno personale, ma per una causa. Negli anni Novanta, con la diffusione di Internet, l’hacking cambiò volto. La comunità hacker si divise: da un lato c’erano i “white hat” (cappelli bianchi), hacker etici che lavoravano per migliorare la sicurezza dei sistemi; dall’altro, i “black hat” (cappelli neri), individui o gruppi motivati da interessi personali, economici o criminali. Fu in questo periodo che nacquero i primi virus informatici progettati per danneggiare i sistemi, come “Michelangelo”, che colpì centinaia di migliaia di computer nel 1992. Un altro esempio di attacco significativo fu quello del gruppo hacker “L0pht”, che nel 1998 testimoniò davanti al Congresso degli Stati Uniti avvertendo che l’intero Internet poteva essere paralizzato in soli 30 minuti. Questo gruppo di hacker etici, pur non avendo intenzioni malevole, dimostrò quanto le infrastrutture informatiche fossero fragili e vulnerabili. Con il nuovo millennio, l’hacking si è evoluto in una vera e propria industria. Gli attacchi informatici non sono più frutto di singoli individui, ma spesso vengono condotti da organizzazioni strutturate, talvolta supportate da governi. Il fenomeno del ransomware, emerso in modo dirompente con attacchi come quello di WannaCry nel 2017, ha dimostrato come l’hacking sia diventato una minaccia economica globale. I cybercriminali moderni mirano a rubare dati sensibili, estorcere denaro o influenzare intere economie. Parallelamente, sono emersi gruppi di hacker come Anonymous, che combinano hacktivismo e attacchi mirati per promuovere cause politiche. Questi gruppi hanno colpito governi, multinazionali e organizzazioni religiose, utilizzando metodi come il DDoS per interrompere i servizi. La storia degli hacker è una storia di creatività, ribellione e innovazione. Da pionieri che esploravano i primi computer a gruppi organizzati che sfruttano le vulnerabilità dei sistemi globali, gli hacker hanno plasmato il mondo digitale come lo conosciamo oggi. La loro evoluzione continua, spingendo governi e aziende a sviluppare tecnologie sempre più sofisticate per proteggere dati e infrastrutture. Tuttavia, l’essenza dell’hacking rimane la stessa: una sfida costante ai limiti della tecnologia, con conseguenze che possono essere tanto costruttive quanto distruttive.

crossposted from: https://jlai.lu/post/15932635

Hey everyone!

I hope this post does not break the rules, last year I ran Lemmyvision a song contest on Lemmy, and I'm excited to announce that the second edition is now live!

For those not in the loop, here's how it works:

TL;DR

• From right now and until April 1st, discuss with your country’s community on Lemmy about which song to send to the contest.
• Submit the song in this community by makign a new thread.
• On April 2nd, voting will begin, where you will rank your favourite songs in a form. Any song not submitted by this date will not be featured.
• On April 8th, results of everyone’s favourite songs will be published.
• You can use !lemmyvision@jlai.lu for any question, this will be the community for updates and results, make sure to subscribe if you’d like to stay in the loop.

You can find all the information needed on this post : https://jlai.lu/post/15932635

Cheers!

The Funkwhale music platform is alive and in active development, and they're working on a feature to filter far-right artists off the network. Some Fediverse self-hosters are divided on letting a third party decide what should be allowed in their library.

The foundation will focus on improving ActivityPub and the user experience, informing policymakers, and educating people about the fediverse and how they can participate. They currently have some backing from Meta, Flipboard, Ghost, Mastodon, and others, and the Ford Foundation has also offered the organization a large grant to get the project started. In total, SWF is closing in on $1 million in financial support (or was, as of September) (from TechCrunch)

We Distribute is a community-organized news site which covers the Fediverse. If you like to write about federated social media then you could help to expand their coverage.

See the link above for more details.

On the meta update, a previous admin was able to get the hexbear.net domain back, and we were able to established shared access. We are thankful for everything that they have done as this site would not exist without them, with this shared access the stress of site administration has been lessened.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/39653865

It's brief, around 25:15

https://youtube.com/watch?v=nf7XHR3EVHo

If you've been sitting on making a post about your favorite instance, this could be a good opportunity to do so.

Going by our registration applications, a lot of people are learning about the fediverse for the first time and they're excited about the idea. I've really enjoyed reading through them :)

This might be dumb, and someone's probably already working on this but it's late and this is just a bugbear I have to get out of my head so I can sleep.

This is a basic outline of the concept of an open‐source federated gaming platform—a decentralized alternative to traditional centralised platforms like Steam.

Fediverse Gaming: Decentralizing Game Distribution, Advertising, and Community Engagement

Abstract

Centralized gaming platforms like Valve's Steam, Blizzard's Battle.Net, Epic Game Store and even GOG ensure that there must always be a singular power who gets rich not from making games but by controlling and exploiting the market. Fediverse Gaming proposes an open-source, federated platform that empowers developers and publishers to host their own game distribution and community hubs. By leveraging the ActivityPub protocol, the open-source platform enables independent instances for selling games, game items, and hosting communities while addressing longstanding concerns over high platform fees, exorbitant advertising costs, and expensive featured placements. In addition, users can post buyer reviews that are shared across instances, fostering transparent and organic community feedback. This decentralization liberates developers from the high fees imposed by centralized platforms, cutting out wasteful middle-men and redefining how games reach their audiences.

1. Introduction

Centralized gaming platforms like Steam have long controlled not only game distribution but also the economic dynamics that shape a game’s visibility and profitability. Developers and publishers must contend with steep platform fees, as well as additional costs for advertising and securing featured placements. Fediverse Gaming aims to disrupt this model by decentralizing game hosting, sales, and community management—offering a transparent, cost-effective alternative that in combination with user communities and reviews build trust and drive organic discovery.

2. Background and Motivation

2.1 Current Centralized Model

• High Platform Fees: Centralized platforms impose substantial fees on game sales, often taking a significant percentage of revenue. This not only affects margins for developers and publishers but also creates a financial barrier to entry for smaller or independent creators.
• Advertising and Featured Fees: Beyond the basic platform fees, developers face additional costs to secure prominent advertising space or to be featured on the platform. These extra charges often skew market exposure in favor of those who can afford high promotional fees.
• Monetization Constraints: The combination of high platform fees and costly promotional expenses means that a significant portion of a game’s revenue is siphoned off by intermediaries, reducing the profitability for creators.

2.2 The Promise of Federation

• Decentralization of Control: A federated model distributes hosting and community management across independent instances, enabling developers to regain control over how their games are promoted and monetized.
• ActivityPub Integration: Leveraging ActivityPub allows for seamless communication between instances. This not only facilitates federated community interactions but also powers a dedicated system for sharing buyer reviews across the network.
• Empowering Stakeholders: By hosting their own instances, developers and publishers can bypass the high fees imposed by centralized platforms, tailor their advertising strategies, and engage directly with their audience.

3. Problem Statement

Developers and publishers face significant hurdles in the current ecosystem:

• Exorbitant Platform Fees: Centralized platforms take a large cut of revenue, leaving less profit for developers and publishers.
• High Advertising Costs: Securing advertising space and featured placements requires additional fees that further erode revenue.
• Fragmented Feedback Channels: Buyer reviews are often siloed within proprietary systems, limiting transparent, cross-community feedback and organic discovery.

4. Proposed Solution: Fediverse Gaming

Fediverse Gaming is designed as an open-source, decentralized platform addressing these challenges through the following core components:

• Federated Instances: Each developer or publisher can deploy an independent node that hosts games, game items, and community features. This autonomy allows for direct control over both distribution and promotion.
• Transparent Fee Structures: By eliminating the middleman, the platform minimizes platform fees and allows developers to set their own pricing and advertising strategies without hidden costs.
• ActivityPub Integration: Facilitates cross-instance communication for community interactions and powers a federated review system, ensuring that buyer reviews are shared network-wide.
• Integrated Storefront: A modular marketplace that manages game listings, secure transactions, and transparent advertising placements—all without the heavy fees of centralized systems.
• Cloud Save Services: A decentralized cloud save solution ensures that player progress is securely stored and accessible across federated servers.
• Review Aggregation Module: Enables buyers to post game reviews locally which are then disseminated across the network, enhancing community trust and aiding organic game discovery.
• Developer/Publisher Dashboard: Provides tools for uploading games, managing advertising space (including options for featured placements), tracking sales, and monitoring promotional performance.

5. System Architecture and Technical Design

5.1 Core Components

• Instance Server: Serves as the backbone for each federated node, managing user authentication, content management, and inter-instance communication.
• Storefront Module: Handles game listings, Lago transactions, and advertising placements, allowing developers to manage fees transparently.
• ActivityPub Integration Layer: Ensures seamless interaction between nodes, enabling community engagement and the sharing of buyer reviews.
• Review Aggregation Module: Collects and distributes buyer reviews from local instances across the entire network, promoting transparency.
• Cloud Save Infrastructure: Uses distributed storage solutions to secure player data across federated servers.
• Developer/Publisher Dashboard: Offers a centralized interface for managing game content, advertising space, fee structures, sales analytics, and community feedback.

5.2 Federation Protocol and Security

• Interoperability: Utilizing ActivityPub guarantees that users across different instances can interact, follow updates, and participate in community discussions, including sharing reviews.
• Security Measures: Regular open-source audits, decentralized identity management, and robust encryption protocols will be implemented to secure data and transactions.
• Scalability: The architecture is designed for horizontal scaling, ensuring that each instance can handle increased loads as the network grows.

6. Minimum Viable Product (MVP) Specifications

To validate the concept and enable iterative development, the MVP should include:

• Federated Instance Deployment: A basic server setup with user registration, profile management, and instance configuration.
• Core ActivityPub Functionality: Fundamental integration to support cross-instance interactions, including posting, commenting, and federated sharing of buyer reviews.
• Digital Storefront: A minimal e-commerce system supporting game listings, transaction processing, and transparent advertising management.
• Cloud Saves: Initial integration of cloud storage to securely backup player progress.
• Developer/Publisher Dashboard: Tools for uploading games, managing advertising and featured placements, tracking sales, and monitoring fee structures.
• Review Aggregation Module: A system enabling buyers to submit game reviews locally, which are then federated across instances via ActivityPub.
• Documentation and API Endpoints: Comprehensive documentation and APIs to facilitate third-party integrations and future expansion.

7. Benefits to Developers and Publishers

7.1 Cost Efficiency and Fee Transparency

• No More Platform Fees: By eliminating centralized intermediaries, developers retain a larger share of their revenue, avoiding the high cuts imposed by traditional platforms.
• Reduced Advertising Costs: Developers can manage their own advertising and featured placements, setting transparent and competitive pricing models without hidden fees.
• Direct Financial Control: Independent instance hosting allows for complete oversight of fee structures, reducing dependence on opaque centralized policies.

7.2 Enhanced Community Feedback

• Federated Game Reviews: A network-wide review system provides comprehensive, transparent feedback from buyers, improving trust and aiding organic discovery.
• Direct Audience Engagement: Developers can interact directly with their users, gaining real-time insights and feedback without intermediaries.

7.3 Innovation and Flexibility

• Modular Architecture: The platform’s design supports the seamless integration of new features—ranging from advanced advertising analytics to enhanced review moderation tools.
• Interoperability: Federation across the network encourages collaboration, cross-promotion, and community growth among independent developers and publishers.

8. Development Roadmap and Future Work

Phase 1: Planning and Prototyping

• Finalize the architecture design with an emphasis on transparent fee management, advertising integration, and review federation.
• Develop initial prototypes for federated instance deployment and ActivityPub integration, including a basic review aggregation module.
• Engage early adopters to gather feedback on fee structures, advertising models, and review functionalities.

Phase 2: MVP Development

• Build core modules: instance server, storefront, review aggregation, cloud save integration, and developer dashboard.
• Conduct testing focusing on cost transparency, transaction handling, and review dissemination.
• Publish initial documentation and developer APIs for community contributions.

Phase 3: Beta Release

• Launch a public beta with select developers and publishers.
• Monitor performance and gather feedback on costs, advertising effectiveness, and review functionalities.
• Refine core features based on user input and performance analytics.

Phase 4: Full Launch and Expansion

• Officially release the platform with comprehensive documentation, support channels, and community forums.
• Explore advanced features such as multi-currency support, patch support, speed improvements, game lists such as best reviewed, top sellers, and new and upcoming lists, and add more sophisticated review moderation.
• Foster a community-driven ecosystem for ongoing innovation and continuous improvements in decentralized game hosting.

9. Challenges and Mitigation Strategies

• Technical Complexity: Integrating a robust federated system with transparent fee management, e-commerce, and review sharing requires thorough planning and extensive testing.
  Mitigation: Utilize modular design principles and proven protocols like ActivityPub and Lago to ensure smooth operations across instances.
• Adoption Barriers: Convincing developers to transition from established, centralized fee structures may be challenging.
  Mitigation: Highlight the financial and operational benefits, such as lower hosting fees and reduced advertising costs, while demonstrating the value of direct community engagement. This may be appealing to indie developers burned in the recent mass layoffs by the monopolies.
• Consistency in Review Aggregation: Ensuring that game reviews are accurately shared and moderated across decentralized nodes can be complex.
  Mitigation: Develop robust algorithms and community guidelines for review aggregation and moderation, with input from early adopters.

10. Conclusion

By decentralizing game hosting, advertising, and review aggregation, the platform empowers developers and publishers to regain control over their financial outcomes and promotional strategies. With transparent fee structures that alleviate high platform and advertising costs, coupled with a federated review system that amplifies buyer feedback, Fediverse Gaming paves the way for a more equitable, innovative, and community-driven marketplace. Stakeholders are invited to collaborate in shaping this next-generation ecosystem for independent game distribution and promotion.

This outlines the vision, design, MVP specifications, and strategic benefits of Fediverse Gaming—positioning it as a compelling alternative for developers and publishers seeking greater financial control, reduced fees, and enhanced community engagement in the competitive gaming ecosystem.