112
non-Euclidean filesystem (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by qaz@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I noticed that I only had 5 GiB of free space left today. After quickly deleting some cached files, I tried to figure out what was causing this, but a lot was missing. Every tool gives a different amount of remaining storage space. System Monitor says I'm using 892.2 GiB/2.8 TiB (I don't even have 2.8 TiB of storage though???). Filelight shows 32.4 GiB in total when scanning root, but 594.9 GiB when scanning my home folder.

Meanwhile, ncdu (another tool to view disk usage) shows 2.1 TiB with an apparent size of 130 TiB of disk space!

    1.3 TiB [#############################################] /.snapshots
  578.8 GiB [####################                         ] /home
  204.0 GiB [#######                                      ] /var
   42.5 GiB [#                                            ] /usr
   14.1 GiB [                                             ] /nix
    1.3 GiB [                                             ] /opt
. 434.6 MiB [                                             ] /tmp
  350.4 MiB [                                             ] /boot
   80.8 MiB [                                             ] /root
   23.3 MiB [                                             ] /etc
.   5.5 MiB [                                             ] /run
   88.0 KiB [                                             ] /dev
@   4.0 KiB [                                             ]  lib64
@   4.0 KiB [                                             ]  sbin
@   4.0 KiB [                                             ]  lib
@   4.0 KiB [                                             ]  bin
.   0.0   B [                                             ] /proc
    0.0   B [                                             ] /sys
    0.0   B [                                             ] /srv
    0.0   B [                                             ] /mnt

I assume the /.snapshots folder isn't really that big, and it's just counting it wrong. However, I'm wondering whether this could cause issues with other programs thinking they don't have enough storage space. Steam also seems to follow the inflated amount and refuses to install any games.

I haven't encountered this issue before, I still had about 100 GiB of free space last time I booted my system. Does anyone know what could cause this issue and how to resolve it?

EDIT 2024-04-06:

snapper ls only shows 12 snapshots, 10 of them taken in the past 2 days before and after zypper transactions. There aren't any older snapshots, so I assume they get cleaned up automatically. It seems like snapshots aren't the culprit.

I also ran btrfs balance start --full-balance --bg / and that netted me an additional 30 GiB's of free space, and it's only at 25% yet.

EDIT 2024-04-07: It seems like Docker is the problem.

I ran the docker system prune command and it reclaimed 167 GB!

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works 83 points 8 months ago

Sorry I don't have an answer but I like the title.

[-] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 22 points 8 months ago

A typical quantum entangled hyperbolic non-linear file system, or QEHNLFS for short. This was first described in Einstein's fourth relativity theory. I states the following:

In any QEHNLFS the perceived storage space (used and unused) may vary depending on the reference frame. All reference frames are equally valid and therefore the absolute storage space of the QEHNLFS is not well defined. QEHNLFSs generally appear around a central supermassive black hole, typically located at /dev/null in the QEHNLFS

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Sorry, but Maxwell's equations look wayyy better.

[-] Cyber@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago

Probably due to too much coffee in his house.

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 14 points 8 months ago

Something... something... Schrödinger

[-] maiskanzler@feddit.de 63 points 8 months ago

Your btrfs snapshots are possibly counted separately by all the regular tools. They simply go into every directory they can find and add up the size of the files they see. They do not care if they are looking at an identical snapshot of the folder next to them, they simply add it all up.

Use sudo btrfs filesystem show (and maybe add a path behind it, I am not sure). That will give you the true usage.

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

sudo btrfs filesystem show seems to display a reasonable amount.

Label: none  uuid: af5f864d-2de9-48a9-b521-5923dc08c9e3
        Total devices 1 FS bytes used 867.13GiB
        devid    1 size 922.12GiB used 921.12GiB path /dev/mapper/system-root
[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This makes sense. When you use a copy-on-write block device, it is doing things below the level of the filesystem, so you have to use cow-aware tools to get an accurate view of your used disk space. For example, if you have two files that are 100% deduplicated at the cow-block level, they would show up as different inodes on the filesystem and would appear as using twice the space in the filesystem as they do on the block device. Same would go for snapshots and compressed blocks.

See also: https://www.ctrl.blog/entry/file-cloning.html

[-] rImITywR@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago

From the btrfs page on the archwiki

General linux userspace tools such as df(1) will inaccurately report free space on a Btrfs partition. It is recommended to use btrfs filesystem usage to query Btrfs partitions.

[-] Brickardo@feddit.nl 28 points 8 months ago

I confess I'm a big fan of the post title

[-] digdilem@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago

This is a common thing one needs to do. Not all linux gui tools are perfect, and some calculate number differently (1000 vs 1024 soon mounts up to big differences). Also, if you're running as a user, you're not going to be seeing all the files.

Here's how I do it as a sysadmin:

As root, run:

du /* -shc |sort -h

"disk usage for all files in root, displaying a summary instead of listing all sub-files, and human-readable numbers, with a total. Then sort the results so that the largest are at the bottom"

Takes a while (many minutes, up to hours or days if you've slow disks, many files or remote filesystems) to run on most systems and there's no output until it finishes because it's piping to sort. You can speed it up by omitting the "|sort -h" bit, and you'll get summaries when each top level dir is checked, but you won't have a nice sorted output.

You'll probably get some permission errors when it goes through /proc or /dev

You can be more targetted by picking some of the common places, like /var - here's mine from a debian system, takes a couple of seconds. I'll often start with /var as it's a common place for systems to start filling up along with /home.

root@scrofula:~# du /var/* -shc |sort -h
0       /var/lock
0       /var/run
4.0K    /var/local
4.0K    /var/mail
4.0K    /var/opt
168K    /var/tmp
4.1M    /var/spool
5.5M    /var/backups
781M    /var/log
787M    /var/cache
8.3G    /var/www
36G     /var/lib
46G     total

Here we can see /var/lib has a lot of stuff in it, so we can look into that with du /var/lib/* -shc|sort -h - it turns out mine has some big databases in /var/lib/mysql and a bunch of docker stuff in /var/lib/docker, not surprising.

Sometimes you just won't be able to tally what you're seeing with what you're using. Often that might be due to a locked file having been deleted or truncated, but the lock's still preventing the OS from seeing the recovered space. That generally sorts itself out with various timeouts, but you can try and find it with lsof, or if the machine isn't doing much, a quick reboot.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 8 months ago

I tend to use du -hxd1 / rather than -hs so that it stays on one filesystem (usually I'm looking for usage of only one file system) and descends one directory.

[-] digdilem@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Good thinking. That would speed things up on some systems for sure.

[-] t0m5k1@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

This is the way.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Use df to show disk usage. df -h is most useful.

I'd guess the odd usage numbers is due to sparse files. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Sparse_file

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

I'm using BTRFS with compression, so that might also explain the numbers to some extent.

I ran df -h but I'm not exactly sure how to interpret this. There are multiple file systems which seem to use all the space on the disk.

Filesystem               Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/system-root  923G  875G   29G  97% /
devtmpfs                 4.0M  8.0K  4.0M   1% /dev
tmpfs                     16G   86M   16G   1% /dev/shm
efivarfs                 128K   46K   78K  37% /sys/firmware/efi/efivars
tmpfs                    6.3G  3.0M  6.3G   1% /run
tmpfs                     16G  442M   16G   3% /tmp
/dev/mapper/system-root  923G  875G   29G  97% /.snapshots
/dev/mapper/system-root  923G  875G   29G  97% /boot/grub2/i386-pc
/dev/mapper/system-root  923G  875G   29G  97% /boot/grub2/x86_64-efi
/dev/mapper/system-root  923G  875G   29G  97% /home
/dev/mapper/system-root  923G  875G   29G  97% /opt
/dev/mapper/system-root  923G  875G   29G  97% /srv
/dev/mapper/system-root  923G  875G   29G  97% /root
/dev/mapper/system-root  923G  875G   29G  97% /var
/dev/mapper/system-root  923G  875G   29G  97% /usr/local
/dev/nvme1n1p1           511M  226M  286M  45% /boot/efi
overlay                  923G  875G   29G  97% /var/lib/docker/overlay2/f307539e15a1a33ca416c757e267c389450275eec9e7f945ef0d8680d162eac2/merged
overlay                  923G  875G   29G  97% /var/lib/docker/overlay2/8e4898a8e32696e94dd6bb5c00d02893c0b629efda7f4a8c37da2d213fe1ffab/merged
overlay                  923G  875G   29G  97% /var/lib/docker/overlay2/db20cdcf8192f6a6597a3ad8330273f0435db9d4acfa8e20ad65524ab075697f/merged
overlay                  923G  875G   29G  97% /var/lib/docker/overlay2/92ce05516bde97ae9ff6d3c6b079e7c49b6691ebcfc60b850637cab20a921ebe/merged
tmpfs                    3.2G   17M  3.2G   1% /run/user/1000
overlay                  923G  875G   29G  97% /var/lib/docker/overlay2/5a00d8c61b23c26c87fcb3be721bc1224db7de3c9a53ae4f9bc2b922ebe40c83/merged
overlay                  923G  875G   29G  97% /var/lib/docker/overlay2/4f20dcdebc64c2603b5b5f6ad71e116b52e8e20af2a3fe53f9ca653421f871db/merged
[-] Corngood@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago

Try using btdu. I'm not sure how it works with compression, but it at least understands snapshots, as long as they are named in a sane way.

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Thanks for the suggestion. The repository says it is able to deal with BTRFS compression.

I do have some issues using the application. The instructions say to run it with the filesystem you want to check as argument. However, I get an error when using it with the root filesystem from df -h --output=source,target. Running sudo btdu /dev/mapper/system-root gives the following error: Fatal error: /dev/mapper/system-root is not a btrfs filesystem. /etc/fstab shows /dev/system/root as being mounted on /, but it gives the same error.

Do you happen to know which path I should be using (or how I can find out)?

EDIT 2024-04-07: It seems like Docker is the problem.

I ran the docker system prune command and it reclaimed 167 GB!

[-] EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

You need to point it at a directory that has the btrfs root subvolume mounted on it (subvolid=5) although I thought it gave a different error if that was your problem.

[-] Corngood@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

As the other user suggested, you probably just need to mount the root subvolume somewhere and run it on that.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 4 points 8 months ago

Unless you have multiple partitions or disks just concentrate on the one for /. So you have 29 GiB available.

Everything else is sharing the same drive for different purposes.

The beauty of BTRFS is that you can partition your disk into different parts but still actually use the whole disk for every "partition". That makes management of snapshots easier. I think it would even enable you to combine multiple physical disks into one.

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago

... combine multiple physical disks into one.

Isn't that RAID 0 and generally a bad idea? Since one disk failure can bring down the whole system.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 2 points 8 months ago

Probably. I never looked into how it actually works with BTRFS.

[-] EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

You can set the metadata and data independently as RAID0, RAID1 or other levels depending on the number of disks and your desired level of data loss risk.

[-] rotopenguin@infosec.pub 2 points 8 months ago

You can do "zfs style raid things" with btrfs, but there are way too many reports of it ending badly for my tastes. Something-something about "write hole".

[-] mst241@feddit.de 7 points 8 months ago

Well, maybe you just have a non-measurable set as filesystem 😅

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It could be that hardlinked files are being double-counted. What software manages that snapshot folder?

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I'm using BTRFS with snapper.

[-] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 4 points 8 months ago

Maybe it's time to clean out some old snapshots in Snapper.

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

sudo snapper list shows 1 snapshot without a date, 1 old one, and 10 taken in the past couple of days before and after zypper transactions. It seems like they get cleaned up automatically.

[-] rotopenguin@infosec.pub 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There's hardlink, and then below that there's the COW/dedupe version called "reflink". Two files can point to the same chunks of data (extents), and altering one does not alter the other. Two files can point to just some of the same chunks of data, too. I don't think there is much indicator for when this is happening, besides the free space vs used space accounting looking crazy. If you "compsize" two reflinked files at once, it'll show you the difference.

[-] dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago

If you're using compression, try compsize.

[-] rollingflower@lemmy.kde.social 3 points 8 months ago

Look at this:

https://gitlab.com/TheEvilSkeleton/flatpak-dedup-checker

I think that has some BTRFS stuff in it to display actual size with deduplication

BTRFS support in Filelight/kio is pretty important.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

when summing up totals, docker containers and snaps are likely counted twice in some programs: they have volume files that are counted once and then those are mounted as file systems and their contents can be counted again in the mount point.

[-] rotopenguin@infosec.pub 2 points 8 months ago

compsize will give you an honest overview of what's going on with btrfs.

[-] savvywolf@pawb.social 1 points 8 months ago

Just a heads up: I've noticed that Steam tends to require a bunch of spare space beyond the size the game takes up.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Use df and du

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Those don't work properly due to BTRFS snapshots and compression.

this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
112 points (98.3% liked)

Linux

48655 readers
516 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz