No you still have ill-vaticano here
The point of my comment, which I thought was pretty clear, was to say the image is a little bit bias by only showing the worst people of Ukraine, but showing the best part of the palastinian people (Where hamas has a ~44% approval rating). Shall we continue putting random sources to prove some kind of point, or?
I don’t know if it’s normal to end your message with the ideology you have grouped your “opponent” into, but if that is the case I choose upper-left of the political compass for you (:
It's obviously pretty stupid, but we shouldn't act like the Americans are especially dumb, this is happening all over the globe.
People see: "economy is bad" so people vote out whoever is in power and vote in whoever screams the loudest that they have a magical fix. I would be shocked if the average trump, AFD etc. voter spends more then 15 minutes researching their vote (outside the endless stream of political content on yt and tiktok).
Ads and selling your personal data. In twitter’s case elon musk also uses it to influence politics and amplify his own opinion.
Some also have subscriptions.
At this point stuff like this isn't oniony anymore, just trump supporters being trump supporters.
Yes, and if you complain to much they’ll put the power input on the bottom too next year.
I can’t think of any reason to attack that website, what have they done wrong?
They’re 100% only doing this for money, but still, nice to see them in the right for once.
They’ll merge it with yt shorts, then rename yt short to tiktok (new) then separate the two again and then shut down tiktok and 1 year later yt shorts as well.
I really doubt that is marketing. I just think that’s an over-enthusiastic user.
Apps are generally more optimised for phones, and thus work a little bit better (with the exception of www.wefwef.app). But if you like the website, you don't have to use apps.
You have nebula, but that is paid.
Besides that, not much. Youtube has a way to powerful marketposition.