I didn't actually know it was or wasn't Crawford, just that such a terrible ruling is very much his brand.

And this is why my group is ok saying "that rule is profoundly dumb" and ignoring it while suspecting Crawford of being involved.

I am willing to not be angry anymore. I'll be civil if I see you in public. But I am not willing to have a relationship anymore because while I hold no ill will, I also am unwilling to risk it happening again.

He's broken the departments investigating him and it isn't fun anymore, he doesn't have to be there at this point to win.

Not knowing Ctrl+shift+esc opens the task manager is one thing, but copy and paste should be taught in school.

My satisfaction

There is something to be said about abandoning the generational lines though. Pew Research is doing it

As I understand it, only baby boomers are somewhat unified on things and every generation after that drifted more and more into being less distinct, demographically speaking, as a group. The cadence you reference was unified by the end of WWII and, naturally, diffused from there.

Yes, holding a person accountable for their crimes (maybe, jury is still out) is attacking them...

Unless you're talking media coverage. Cause we all know that the media is an arm of the government...

Bullshit. Source or it didn't happen.

Sadly if you train your AI on racist data, you get a racist robot. So that's not a given.

My money is on zero. They'll comment it out and then turn it back on when no one is looking.