[-] beastlykings@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Aww man I missed this, didn't know it was happening. Happy for you all!

1
Ender 3 V2 damage? (sh.itjust.works)

Hi there! I've had this printer about a year now. I used to use my buddies og Ender 3, and when the V2 was on sale I "upgraded" and got my own.

I realize now that for just a bit more money I could've had a much more performant machine, but, oh well. I'm gonna use this for a good long while. I only print as an occasional hobby, or to augment my other hobbies.

Anywho, it's been on a shelf up and out of the way all winter, unused, in a climate controlled room.

I pulled it out the other day to do a few prints, it works great. Ran about 12 or 16 hours of prints through it. But today I noticed these cracks. This seems to be the belt tensioner for the bed? Did I have it too tight? Am I supposed to relax it while it's being stored?

I can probably print a replacement. But I was just wondering what your thoughts were.

Thanks!

1
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by beastlykings@sh.itjust.works to c/cat@lemmy.world

A nugget of information for everyone, that I just learned this morning:

We all know that cats nails naturally shed, that's why they need a scratching post, to reveal the pointy new nail.

Well apparently, as cats age, their nails thicken, and it can get to the point where they stop shedding. And if you don't notice it, the nail will keep growing in a circle, until it stabs into their own paw meat. From what I read, this is extremely painful, because it just keeps digging deeper, and never stops.

You can prevent it by checking all your elderly cats nails every so often. Apparently they can become ingrown in as little as 3 months, if it's gonna happen.

Now my cat needs a vet appointment, because one of his nails did this, and it's too bad for me to safely fix. I think he'll need antibiotics.

We didn't see it because we usually only trim his front nails, not his front thumb(?) nails, or his backs. His backs are fine, but they will be getting checked going forward.

Mods, hopefully this is allowed here. I know it's mostly memes, but this is the most cat centric place I could find on Lemmy. And I certainly didn't know this before today. If I'd caught it sooner, I could've saved him some pain. Maybe someone else can save their pet the same fate.

Edit: Cat tax:

10

!elianscript@sh.itjust.works

What is Elianscript? It's an alternative writing system whose properties combine the linearity of spelling with the free-form nature of drawing.

It's also kind of like a weak cipher, to those not in the know. Similar to a pigpen cipher, but instead of randomly jumbling the letters, we all agree to do it alphabetically. That way everyone IN the know, can read it. It's a lock to keep out honest people.

This is quite niche, and some might say it should be part of a larger cryptography community. But really it's more artistic than that, it's not meant to be jumbled or rearranged to make it more cryptic.

Anywho, I hope you'll enjoy it as much as I do!

134

I've been toying with Linux on and off for almost 20 years now.

Started with damnsmalllinux on some ancient 600mhz Thinkpads. Dual booted Ubuntu for a long time, back when 3d desktop cubes were all the rage, so I'm used to gnome, synaptic and apt.

Tried to stick with it, but never could get away from Windows entirely. Especially for gaming, and a few critical apps. Eventually I kind of drifted away, and went full Windows for years. I always keep an Ubuntu LTS thumb drive around, and would use it occasionally for various reasons, testing etc etc.

Recently I installed Ubuntu 24.04, and had tons of stability issues. Mostly involving video output and the GUI. Screen would jitter left and right a few pixels. And sometimes maximized windows would be transparent to clicks, so you'd be clicking random stuff below the window. This was especially bad with Firefox and VLC, separately. I also had issues with removable drives not mounting properly. Standard stuff, I wasn't doing anything weird. Practically a fresh install.

So I tried Mint, cinnamon. And so far I really like it! I've not been running it daily, but just the same tinkering. And so far no issues at all. But that got me thinking, what else am I missing?

I'm comfortable in the command line, but not proficient, I appreciate a good GUI for most things.

I plan to do some gaming, so steam proton compatibility is important. I don't think that's hard to achieve, but I wanted to make sure, it's important to me.

Last time I played with KDE was a decade ago, I hear there's lots of new developments going on there? In plasma? Unless plasma is different now, IDK I haven't looked extremely hard.

I don't care much about customization, I don't want arch. I want something that is a pretty solid base, with decent features, and good support for when this go sideways. I feel like that's not Ubuntu anymore. Especially with them pushing into Wayland and flat packs.

I guess my question is, does Mint seem like a good distro to start with? Or am I not looking hard enough?

Thanks!

[-] beastlykings@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

It's a joke, because EA added crap to their games and defended it with those exact words.

That's why you're being downvoted by everyone.

[-] beastlykings@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Amateur radio is fun. Cheap to get into, but gets a bit expensive pretty fast.

But, you can talk to people all over the world with nothing but a bit of wire strung up in a tree. No million dollars worth of computers and infrastructure between you, no. Just two people, two radios, two pieces of wire in two trees. It's crazy that it works at all but it does!

Getting a license costs something like $30-40 bucks I think. Used to be free even just a few years ago, but now they've added fees to get it.

You can get into a handheld radio that'll let you talk to your local group of people for $20-30, that'll get you say... 50-100 miles with repeaters. More if they are linked.

If you wanna go further, you've gotta go to lower frequencies. A low power HF radio can be had as cheap as $80-100 ish. You can technically talk around the world with it, but at only 5 watts, it'll be tough to do unless conditions are just right. People do it all the time, but it's a challenge, a skill to learn.

$300-400 ish gets you into a 20 watt HF radio, that'll do significantly better, and actually that's the radio I use most the time when I go out hiking with a plan on operating in the woods. For this price you could also get an older tube or hybrid radio that is 100-130 watts, but the learning curve can be a little steep, they are big and heavy, and even if you know what you're doing, they can be a but less convenient than modern radios. Not that there's anything wrong with them, one of my first radios was one of this type, I bought it broken and fixed it, I still own it.

$800-1000 gets you all the radio most people ever need. Modern digital HF radio, 100 watts, plenty of bells and whistles, practically operates itself. People can and do talk all around the world on 100 watts all the time. Though at this point I have to admit, even with this amount of power, it can be a challenge to talk to the furthest people unless conditions are just right.

Ok, so more power, right? Well, yes, you can do that. The legal limit in the USA is 1500 watts. But there's a few things to consider about that.

First, yes, more power will make your signal go further. That's true. But when you're trying to reach the furthest people, often times it's your ability to hear the other person, that's more important. In the hobby they say you don't want to be an alligator, all mouth, no ears. It doesn't matter how well the other guy hears you, if you can't hear him, then you aren't communicating.

The answer? A better antenna. That wire in a tree does wonders. Honestly, one of my first and most memorable long distance contacts was from lower Michigan to Japan, with 100 watts and a wire in a tree. Almost 7000 miles. Honestly, it was amazing. But later I would make similar contacts semi-frequently, by using a directional antenna called a yagi.

They cost about $500-1000 for the smaller ones, bigger and better gets into the thousands, not counting the minimum 30 foot tower to put it on. Thankfully mine was gifted to me, it was in bad condition, stored in a crawlspace under a house. But I cleaned and repaired it with 3d printed parts. And I had an old TV tower that I put it on, instead of buying and building one. All free.

The way it works is by taking the radio energy and focusing it all one direction. Kind of like how the lightbulb in a cars headlamp is very bright by itself, but put inside the special housing in the car, it gets focused so you can see further down the road. It's the same energy, just focused.

My antenna had a gain of 8dB. What that means is that whatever direction I was pointing it, it took the 100 watts from my radio, and essentially focused it into a 600 watt beam of radio waves. (There's more to it than that, but I'm fudging some of the details here for ease of understanding).

Now the beauty of this is that it works in both ways. So if I'm pointing it at Japan, and the guy over there is only pumping out 100 watts, then from my perspective, it's almost like he's using 600 watts. See how that's better? Now we're both louder! (Again, details fudged here).

Now if you take an antenna like that, and pump 600 or 1200 watts into it (those are the sizes of the two amplifiers I have), then your effective output in that one direction is more like 3800 or 7500 watts! That kind of power really does make a difference, a lot of the time. So, why not even more!

Well, here's where we come back to earth a bit. Yes more power is better. But there are diminishing returns. Radio signals are like sound waves, in the sense that the decibel scale is logarithmic. Twice the power does not get you twice the loudness.

This is too hard to explain without you having a frame of reference, but.. basically, the improvement in signal you get by going from a 5 watt radio to a hundred watt radio, well, it's pretty significant, right? It takes something difficult to hear, and makes it much easier.

Well, the increase between those two powers, is over 13 decibels. Now, in order to get that same "Wow, now that's much better!" Improvement? You'd need another 13 decibels. But to do that, you'd need to go from 100 watts, to, well, an illegal output of 2000 watts. The next 13 decibels would require jumping up to 40,000 watts! Decidedly illegal. And you wouldn't want to stand next to it haha.

So while amplifiers do help, especially when paired with good antennas. Most people don't bother using them because they usually cost around and over a thousand dollars, or more, for the 600-1000 watt ones. The 1500 watt ones are even more expensive. And you have to upgrade everything else in your equipment to handle the extra power. And for what? A bit better signal?

Don't get me wrong, I use them. But, not always 🤷‍♂️ and I have no desire for a legal limit amplifier, not unless I had money to burn.

A good antenna is a much better investment, though doing that right can get very expensive very fast.

Anywho, sorry for the long post, guess I kind of got carried away. I didn't even cover half the stuff we do. POTA, SOTA, Field Day, email and SMS, GPS tracking, satellites, moon bounce, meteor scatter, the role of the sun and ionosphere. Grey line propagation. Fox hunting (not actual foxes), including TDOA. Digital modes like FT8 and APRS, FreeDV, SSTV. Morse code is alive and thriving. Building and fixing radios, building and designing antennas. All that and so much more.

If you have any interest in technology at all, do yourself a favor and at least look into ham radio. It's literally a license to play with science stuff. And while a lot of it can be expensive, as I've described. A lot of it really isn't, and most of the fun I have is with stuff I've made, not bought.

[-] beastlykings@sh.itjust.works 52 points 3 months ago

This is me 100%.

Though I'm probably right, I'm fine with being wrong. I don't want to spread untruths. I'd rather learn the true thing and try not to forget it.

[-] beastlykings@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 months ago

Don't know why you're getting downvoted. This makes perfect sense to me. Overkill? Maybe. Maybe not. We don't know what this guys needs are.

Perfectly valid points,imo.

[-] beastlykings@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

The recent Interstella 5555 "remaster" was also done with AI, and a lot of people really hate it. Myself included.

Not because "AI bad!", but just because it sucks. Lots of errors, and loss of the original vibe and texture.

[-] beastlykings@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago

It's the same body of water, one lake. It's just massive, and surrounds the lower peninsula of Michigan, so they gave each side of the lake a different name.

Truly it's massive, it behaves almost like the ocean in a lot of ways. A lot of water.

[-] beastlykings@sh.itjust.works 19 points 6 months ago

Eh it works just fine 🤷‍♂️

[-] beastlykings@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago

Most of the 24 hour Walmarts and similar stores in my area stopped doing that during COVID, and then never did again. Most close at 10 or 11. I miss going into Meijer at 3am and getting... Whatever I wanted 🤷‍♂️

[-] beastlykings@sh.itjust.works 25 points 11 months ago

As I understand it, there's a range of sizes that are problematic, from small to micro to nano and beyond.

The problem is the more plastic we make, and the smaller it starts, the easier it is for it to get worn down into smaller and smaller bits that become more problematic for us.

One of the problems with all the macro plastics in the ocean is that that as they get churned up and baked in the UV from the sun, smaller and smaller bits break off and become part of the... Everything.

Micro plastics are so prevalent that they can't even do proper studies on how harmful it might be to us, because there are no control groups that have no plastics inside their bodies to compare against. Even babies in the womb have plastic in them. You have plastic in you right now, almost a 100% guarantee.

There's probably more to it than that even, but that's my understanding of it.

[-] beastlykings@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

I would also like to know the answer to this

[-] beastlykings@sh.itjust.works 122 points 1 year ago

Why make it a card then? If it's meant to be stored as a document then it should be the size of an envelope, or a standard A4 sheet.

I keep mine attached to the envelope sized paper it came on. But it shouldn't be a card shape, that encourages people to carry it. My grandpa always carried his.

view more: next ›

beastlykings

joined 2 years ago