79
submitted 11 months ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/news@hexbear.net
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 67 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You can't just say "China launches new precision strike against pentagon" like that.

[-] sodium_nitride@hexbear.net 54 points 11 months ago

“This is not a mere supply chain hiccup, it’s a geopolitical earthquake in slow motion. Every fighter jet delayed, every missile contract disrupted, every paused satellite payload becomes a ripple in America’s strategic posture."

The Americans stretching themselves thin before preparing to fight their greatest adversary yet. If a mere embargo on some metals is a "geopolitical earthquake" for your national security, how could you possibly expect to fight a world war?

NioCorp is developing a critical minerals project in Nebraska that is expected to produce the processed rare earths to which China now seeks to restrict U.S. access, as well as niobium, titanium, and scandium.

Let me guess, it's a private company and will overcharge the government and under deliver.

[-] jack@hexbear.net 42 points 11 months ago

Let me guess, it's a private company and will overcharge the government and under deliver.

football-lucy

[-] Cimbazarov@hexbear.net 27 points 11 months ago

Capitalism will kill itself sit-back-and-enjoy

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

I don't think the government will let them under deliver. Over charge? Definitely. But they'll deliver. The cost will be paid in the environmental impact that the US will do absolutely nothing to mitigate.

[-] sodium_nitride@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago

I don't think the government will let them under deliver.

I mean, it's not like the US government didn't know about the rare earth metals vulnerability up until now. There must be some reason why even after all this time, they haven't managed to fix this supply chain issue. And as far as I am aware, REMs are used for many civilian applications as well, and the US military could probably manage for a while if the civilian sector took the brunt of the damage.

And there is also the fact that utilization of REMs could be reduced by the military if they stopped forcing every single missile and plane to be some boutique artifact that people will find buried in the post-irradiation ruins of the US a 1000 years from now and wonder if these were ritual tools used for worshiping the gods.

[-] Edie@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Who'll win?

Our $10 trillion per missile wünderwaffen will ensure our win

It's held together with gaffa and prayers

[-] sodium_nitride@hexbear.net 41 points 11 months ago

This is a precision strike by China

If embargoes are precision strikes, then you started this "war" by embargoing China of advanced semiconductors.

[-] miz@hexbear.net 29 points 11 months ago

history starts when the non-whites retaliate

ukkkraine idf-cool

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 39 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That is a fascinating choice of titles. So fascinating that I've actually forgotten what it was actually about.

“This is not a mere supply chain hiccup, it’s a geopolitical earthquake in slow motion. Every fighter jet delayed, every missile contract disrupted, every paused satellite payload becomes a ripple in America’s strategic posture. And with Russia and China tightening coordination, this may mark the start of a material cold war fought not with tanks, but with export licenses and embargoes,” he added.

Oh brother... You started it. Not them. Stop being dickheads and they'll stop.

[-] sodium_nitride@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago

I don't think they will stop, and I hope they will not stop. Let the Yankees sweat. They need to know that playing these embargo games has consequences.

[-] heartheartbreak@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago

astronaut-2 "wow this is the start of a cold war cant believe china would do this" astronaut-1

[-] TrustedFeline@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago

This is a press release from a defense contractor

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 11 months ago

That of itself doesn't make it false though. The fact that China controls majority of rare earth supply chains is well established, and these are inputs for pretty much every bit of high tech equipment.

[-] TrustedFeline@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago

Agreed, but it's still important context that this isn't a news org

[-] Firefly7@hexbear.net 18 points 11 months ago

This is from April 4th. it’s the same one as was announced a couple weeks ago :(

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 11 months ago

Yeah, but the analysis of how it hits US military supply chains is still interesting.

[-] Thordros@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago

At some point in the design process for all these high tech weapons, there must have been some smart boy somewhere in the Pentagon who asked, "Hey, um, if we end up in a hot war, where are we gonna get all this stuff?" And they told him to shut up—there's money to be made.

[-] Sleve_McDichael@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
79 points (100.0% liked)

news

24706 readers
772 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS