3

Head of 2, body of 5.

I dont like any of them but if i had to pick: 2. I like the prongs. But I don't like the handles for any of them

2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it's flimsy lightweight material then none of them.

You come here asking neurodivergents a question and you only give five options?

All of these options are terrible. You should feel ashamed, OP.

Trick question. These are all terrible, therefore I will eat with my fingers.

2 for hand feel alone

Everyone is busily selecting a fork, and I'm trying to figure out if the apostrophe was an intentional troll ..

5

2 and it's not close, 1 is the worst.

How can people chose without weighing them?

2, but I feel like none is good enough. Or sturdy enough. I need 2, but thicker body

2. Neurodivergent’s what?

2

Forget the handles because they all suck. The flared outer tines are a sin and the shorter tines on 1 is a war crime. I would take 3. Ergonomically it's not terrible and I can deal.

When I got married, sitting down with the caterer and choosing between dozens of flatware types, I realized that I personally like three dimensional smoothness, with round, cylindrical handles that have some heft but not too much width. I also like cylindrical tines that don't look like it was made from a flat sheet of metal cut and bent into shape (I prefer tines that are cylindrical, not rectangular prisms).

I also like curves along where the head meets the handle, and along the head itself. No sharp corners or edges.

I dislike ornamentation on the handle itself. I like plain, smooth handles.

I chose the forks for my wedding, and then later on in life, based on what I learned about my own preferences, I bought some flatware that fits those general principles (looks like the Sambonet Hannahs, but cheaper than that very expensive line), and replaced the ones in my house. Now I basically don't have any forks that I don't like.

Anyone interested in developing a "Find your ideal fork" web app?

I for one would be very interested to see statistical preferences...

Obviously #2, but with a slightly smaller handle tip and that's about it.

How thick are they?

1 is too short, 2 is too top heavy, 3 is too thin and light, and 5 is almost a spork.

5, easy

I'd pick 5 but none of these look all that comfy

They are all good since they are all single extruded so no food remains getting in between the metal part and the plastic/wood/other

Though, we could argue that 1. is better that the others for the easy grip due to its in-curved handle. Or that its diametrical opposite, number 5. Is the best thanks to its filleted handle making it easier to hold in the case of the food scooped by it not being very hard.

1. Every other choice is wrong.

2 with 5s handle suppremacy

None of them are usable. If I had to take one, number 3. All the others are a sin.

Edi: I must agree with others though, that the handle of 3 is very bad. Still, the shape of the head is more important to me.

5, easy

What am I eating? Spaghetti is different from steak which is different from peas

...get that f*ucking plural-~~comma~~ apostrophe out of my face...

^1^ ^head^ ^+^ ^5^ ^handle^