30

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 45 points 2 days ago

I wrote the script. You opened a post in a community and downvoted every comment. That's what the message is telling you

That means you really don't like the community, fair enough.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I'm gonna jump in here, since there's some info that might be handy.

See, me and jet have had some disagreements regarding the carnivore diet. I even gave them a bit of hell when the carnivore community was new, objecting strongly to certain posts and their content combined with no sourcing or user friendly way to access sources from lemmy.

I'm pretty sure at one point, I got annoying. I know I was rather, ummmm, direct in my phrasing.

But the real story is that I down voted posts, and comments under posts, when they were misleading or contradicted established best practices to a degree I felt warranted a down vote to reduce visibility/support. I did that part with only minimum contributions otherwise, because I didn't really want to piss on anyone's picnic with the frequency I was seeing that kind of thing. Like, I objected to some of the data and conclusions, but the people didn't really need someone critiquing their dietary choices, you dig? All the folks commenting were just minding their own business and not trying to evangelise, so trying to interfere in their choices would be a dick move.

And I never got banned. Ngl, if I had been running the community and seen the pattern of voting with as little contribution as I was engaging in, I might have banned me.

But, neither actively as a mod, nor via bot, did that happen.

I know that's just one anecdote, and anecdotes have little value. But it's why I would have totally called this a YDI if OP hadn't been batshit and ended up banned here as well.

As far as I'm concerned, jet is a fair and even handed moderator. Might want to tweak the bot a little eventually, but for a niche C/, it seems to do the job it's intended to do.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 7 points 1 day ago

I've seen your interactions in that community as skeptical but polite. You never attacked a user, or insulted anyone. You contributed occasionally.

Would I have preferred your downvotes also have a question/comment with your concerns? Sure

My guiding metric is to make a safe space where others feel comfortable participating in - and your interactions were inline with that.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

At least I managed to present myself in the way intended successfully, skeptical but polite/interested.

I did eventually feel weird voting at all without saying something, so I very rarely do any more. It's still a very interesting subject, I just don't have anything useful to say that I haven't already said in one way or another. Pretty much the same as on vegan, vegetarian, or keto communities tbh. I see them all as valid choices for individuals. So as long as there's nothing that's outright false, the most I can do is chime in with existing best practices, and it isn't like people looking for a specialized diet haven't seen that information.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 day ago

I'm happy for you to ask questions, even questions people would already have seen elsewhere. The conversation is good for everyone.

Plus a question about carnivore, being a subset of keto, gets to birds with one stone!

I really like to dig into the science, what is well researched, what can be demonstrated. Heck, I even spent a bunch of time figuring out why the Rice/Potato/McDougall diet works (its inhibition of the Randell cycle (not a cycle)).

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

I don't want to give OP the benefit of the doubt here due to their behaviour in this thread, but I'll ask more for my own curiosity:

Is there a possibility of false positives if you happened to downvote everything from a certain community while browsing c/all, or is there a temporal element as well that'd make that sort of false positive very unlikely?

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not a great programmer,

This ban message only happens when someone downvotes a post then opens the post and downvotes all the comments.

Is there a bug? Sure, lots! I haven't double checked the logs against this user yet. After work

Notice the one thing this user didnt ask for - to get unbanned so they could contribute to any of those communities

downvote everything from a certain community while browsing c/all

If somebody consistently does that, they are not having a great Lemmy experience and they should block the community

Does it do any good for all the atheists to down vote every catholic post? Nobody is benefiting from that behavior

[-] insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 day ago

Notice the one thing this user didnt ask for - to get unbanned so they could contribute to any of those communities

Has anyone done so since you started doing this? Given the general circumstances here I don't expect many would try (esp. w/silent instance ban), nor do I expect a happy mutual outcome.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 1 day ago
[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago

This ban message only happens when someone downvotes a post then opens the post and downvotes all the comments.

Does it have a comment threshold? I.e. it feels it would be fairly easy to trigger if there's just 1 comment in the thread.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 days ago

These posts are very difficulty to evaluate, because it could be that the mods are paranoid, and reading the votes wrong, or the bans are legit and you're just lying about it. 🤷

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 25 points 1 day ago

Couldn't happen to you on Hexbear.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago

YDI, what did you expect from going there and downvoting all or even most of the contend there? You are aware that mass-downvoting is considered an act of aggression against communities, as it's literally an attempt to downrank their content in the feeds. Many instance admins also don't take kindly to this either, which is probably why they instance banned you from there. This instance that YPTB is hosted on is literally voting for a rule change banning brigading, and many more in the future will likely follow.

If you dislike all of a community's content, you should use the function to block communities. If you believe it is against the rules you should report it by reaching out to admins. Spamming downvotes won't help in either case, it won't make you stop seeing it, and it won't address problematic or rule-breaking content. It just makes you seem like a bot or a troll.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

YDI. Mass downvoting is toxic.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] SomeGuyNamedDave@lemm.ee 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

no idea who these guys are, but I've not been systematically downvoting anyone.

edit:

ironic :D

all seem to be dubvee.org, is this a potential federation issue?

edit 2: also trans rights, BLM, free Palestine, Ukraine is a sovereign nation, bigotry is wrong. just to be clear, I see a lot of people complaining about being banned and their shitty rhetoric reveals them. I try to be an ally, these bans are not warranted, likely a butthurt right winger.

[-] insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe 10 points 2 days ago

A bot was likely involved somewhere in the process (and with tons of potential for false positives), possibly even if it picked up something outside of dubvee. Though that is not the automated message (and I suspect they'd stand behind it even if it were a low amount of votes).

Not sure if it's what you meant, but some of the bans like this stop all of activity from being visible to dubvee users.

[-] archonet@lemy.lol 26 points 2 days ago

Gonna be honest, whether it's a bot or not, the idea of banning people for voting on posts or comments in some way you don't like is deeply funny to me.

"YOU'RE INFLUENCING THE MADE-UP INTERNET POINTS THAT DON'T MATTER! EEEEEEK!"

even I'm not so terminally online.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago

I mean if all someone does is go to communities to downvote every single post, it is clear that they are having an agenda, rather than interacting with the content in a fair way.

As there is an algorithm pushing things to "hot" or "active" in the local and all feeds based on votes, it does have an influence on the visibility of posts.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

One in that list has 5 or so members and attracts about -20 votes on every post and comment. It's unpleasant to visit a community where every post and comment is at -15, even if they're "imaginary points" it makes the community hard to sort

Since Jet started enforcing the "no mass down voting" rule automatically things sit at 0 to +5.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Exactly. It's not about fake internet points it's about making a safe space where the lurkers feel comfortable to contribute and participate without getting dogpiled.

It's very much like growing a garden, it has to be tended to, weeded, and protected from local varmints for the young plants to flourish

The script doesn't run on my personal community !interesting@hackertalks.com because im the only poster and I know internet points aren't real. I don't need to encourage others to participate.

[-] SomeGuyNamedDave@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

STOP USING THE BUTTONS WE GAVE YOU

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
30 points (65.3% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

749 readers
39 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS