96
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by dead@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 55 points 8 months ago

Nope:

They basically just agreed to start talking. The pattern so far with the Trump administration is that they announce huge deals and breakthroughs and the country they're negotiating with says it's not that far along yet. You see it with Russia and Iran.

[-] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 8 months ago

Its a similar tactic the UFC uses and the UFC and Trump are buddy.

Basically what you do is, you publicly announce that a fight deal was made/booked then when the other party says no you yell "See, they dont want to make a deal! They are the problem not me!"

[-] theturtlemoves@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago

That works if you do it once. If you keep doing it you lose credibility.

[-] dead@hexbear.net 27 points 8 months ago

I worded the title in a specific way intentionally. "White House says..." I do not believe the it will be a real "trade deal". I'll update the post to included China's perspective in a moment. China published that tweet right after I created the hexbear post.

[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 17 points 8 months ago

Sorry, I hope my comment didn't come off as criticism of you personally. I just wanted to add the full picture.

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 15 points 8 months ago

I think using "claims" instead of "says" drives the doubt more, just a friendly suggestion.

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 20 points 8 months ago

President Deals: "I got a deal with China.

China: "There is no deal."

President Deals: "I got a deal with China and hundreds of other deals. Plus millions of different deals. So many that even though the China deal is good - and it is good - doesn't matter. Many-many-many deals. Billions and billions and billions and billions of deals. Could be trillions - maybe."

[-] dead@hexbear.net 18 points 8 months ago

I think Trump doesn't even have the ability to negotiate a real trade deal without congressional approval. His only bargaining power is reducing the tariffs he placed and he doesn't want to do that. He had said on truthsocial that he wants the tariff on China to be 80%. Trump administration is admitting now that the tariffs are equal to the trade deficit. He wants China to buy more US-made-trash before he agrees to reduce the tariffs.

The entire meeting was probably US officials trying to sell shit to China like a Timeshare Presentation.

[-] dead@hexbear.net 16 points 8 months ago

Mike Greer in the whitehouse image says "Just remember why we're here in the first place -- the United States has a massive $1.2 trillion trade deficit, so the president declared a national emergency and imposed tariffs"

Trump's administration is now just dropping the pretense? When Trump first announced the tariffs on every country, he came out with that tacky board which was labeled the trade deficit as "Tariffs Charged to the US". Then they posted that convoluted math formula which amounted to be trade deficit multiplied by 1. Now they're pretending that they were saying "trade deficit" all along.

[-] Des@hexbear.net 12 points 8 months ago

they are desperate to try to congeal this into something coherent.

it's like they scatter-shotted every possible explanation into the public and talking heads to try to spin back to Trump as he mindlessly watches TV

oh wait that's exactly what they did

[-] Hestia@hexbear.net 14 points 8 months ago

Ok, so the tariffs aren't being lifted. But for each shipping container, you get some cupcakes in return!

[-] Hestia@hexbear.net 16 points 8 months ago
[-] QuietCupcake@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago
[-] Hestia@hexbear.net 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

But they have sprinkles...

The sprinkles are also cursed.

this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
96 points (100.0% liked)

news

24538 readers
456 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS