63
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NikkiB@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Escalates

Escalates more

Escalates harder

One more time with feeling

Russia has been a European issue to deal with for centuries. The current mess is because of US interference after WW2 and all the Cold War crap. Russia has always wanted to be treated as part of Europe and have a year-round warm water port. Two things that the aristocracy/oligarchy have fought to deny them. Climate change is giving Russia the portsl, while Trump is handing them a new relationship with Europe. The US leaving Europe should have happened decades ago and should be viewed as a good thing; ripping off the band-aid/plaster.

[-] imogen_underscore@hexbear.net 42 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That leaves Ukraine three options. The first is to rely on Europe stepping in to supply the weapons and equipment it needs. The second – proposed earlier this month by Zelensky – was to buy US made weapons from Washington with European money. The third is to make the weapons it needs in Ukrainian factories, funded by money from European allies.

where is the "total capitulation" option? remarkable how western press is still producing these fantastical articles.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 22 points 3 days ago

the meat grinder gets very hungry if you don't feed it people for too long

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] big_spoon@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 days ago

it was bound to happen that the US was gonna abandon the nazi outpost seeing that the war is lost, at least to save face saying in the future "we tried to make peace (because we failed winning a war) but ukraine didn't listen"

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 34 points 3 days ago

Lmao there is no more American sentiment than "Here, take this pinless grenade"

[-] i_c_b_m@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 3 days ago

This just means the US is moving focus to Iran and then China

[-] burlemarx@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 day ago

The good news we can draw from this is that Europe will already be too stretched out with its war with Russia and they won't be able to join the US.

[-] i_c_b_m@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, not sure if that makes a lot of difference

[-] burlemarx@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 20 hours ago

The empire is probably going all out this time.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 3 days ago

If they really do start a war with Iran, they can forget about China at that point.

[-] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago

I think even without the US going to war with Iran, they'd still have to wait years to go to war with China.

Could still happen, hopefully doesn't though.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 3 days ago

I'd argue the fact that Russia was able to defeat NATO in Ukraine is proof that we're long past the point where the west could take on China. The danger is that people running the empire don't seem to understand this.

[-] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago

Oh, for sure. I agree. I think in their demented minds they expect to be able to defeat China in a few years though.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 3 days ago

It's just kind of incredible to watch them continuously taking Ls on every front, but being utterly incapable of taking a step back and doing a bare minimum of introspection.

[-] Grapho@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 days ago

It must be the lead and the microplastics because even Britain knew when to say "yeah kept the seat warm for you big dog lemme head out" instead of stubbornly poking the bear and starting shit all over once America yanked the empire off their hands.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago

Yeah because the most demonically racist people on earth just shrugged and said "at least they're white" when America took over (granted, that's not fully true either, there definitely was a lot of pushback against America in Britain in the inter war period as they tried to isolate the Sterling Area but were unsuccessful)

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 days ago
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 days ago

well they USAF has relocated quite a few logistic suport aircraft from the US to the middle east, and they are pulling forces out of the south china sea to the middle east. It is looking likely that they will change focus to this new shiney thing, especialy given they have hated Iran ever sense the Sha left

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 days ago

It is looking very likely that the US is going to enter the war at this point.

[-] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 days ago

my biggest worry right now is I cannot think of any country that both can aid iran at the moment and is willing. I will admit my regional knolege of the politic of the middle east is not amazing, and has been streched to its limit, but from my limited understanding I am worried Iran is going to be left to go this alone

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 days ago

It's worth noting that Iran absolutely does get support from both Russia and China. There's even a direct rail line going from China through Russia to Iran now. Iran is also a country of 90 million people, with a strong industrial base, its own energy, and food security. It's not really clear to me how the US plans to invade Iran to be honest. The logistics situation is very much stacked against them, and Iran has advanced weapons that can take out US assets like carriers and destroy their bases in the region. Short of going nuclear, Israel and the US will lose this war.

[-] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 days ago

I do not doubt there will be some aid from China, my worry was that Russia is too tied up to provide aid.

That being said now that Pakistan extended their nuclear umbrella I am less concerned about a nuclear war, before then I was quite concered either the US or Israel would use nukes.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 days ago

Oh did Pakistan actually say that Iran is under their nuclear umbrella now? Last I saw they pledged support for Iran, but didn't really specify the details.

[-] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Never mind, I found it on the mega thread, and ICBM mentioned that Pakistan has said it was not true, so nukes are still on the table. I should have waited to independently verify

In the defence of the comrade, Iran said it happened and the only sources I can find where pakistan said they did not are US or Indian, but unless I find a nutural source saying its been extended I will assume it has not

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 days ago

There's a lot of stuff happening all at once, and it's hard to keep up with what's actually been verified or not. I really hope the US is not crazy enough to nuke Iran, but at this point it's hard to rule anything out.

[-] burlemarx@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is very likely that China is already helping Iran in the sidelines. Iran is crucial for the belt and road initiative. Iran's missiles require satellite communication for coordination and Iran does not have those capabilities. Also in regards to electronic warfare, Iran is not as capable as other more powerful nations. It's very likely that China and Russia are supporting Iran in that regard.

Pakistan may also act as China's proxy. There are Shia militias both in Afghanistan, Iraq and Saudi Arabia who are willing to help Iran in case the war gets into the ground. And Iran also has allies in Ansar Allah and Hezbollah (who have a presence both in Qatar and Lebanon). So there's a coalition working in the shadows but ready to set foot in the ground to aid Iran in this war.

My source: https://youtu.be/3lhbAHOHT40

Too bad it is in Portuguese.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 day ago

There are reports of military transfers from China to Iran already. It would obviously be a huge disaster for both Russia and China if Iran was destroyed by the US. I think they will provide as much support as they're able here.

[-] TankieReplyBot@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[-] porcupine@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

a negotiated peaceful settlement is in the best interest of both parties and our nation’s interests.

A good faith position that is both genuine and sure to be applied similarly to America's many other proxy wars of aggression.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
63 points (98.5% liked)

World News

2650 readers
188 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS