119
The problem with militarism is eventually you run out of others people's teenagers.
Tell that to Russia.
Hey Russia, you're all out of teenagers 
Thankfully they have banned trans people from joining the military, and they've even started kicking out long time trans soldiers with a dishonorable discharge.
I started freaking out about a draft but then I remembered I'm 34 and trans so seems unlikely, unless they get very desperate. If they do I'm fragging my CO
A problem easily solved by having a recession.
This was what happened during the build up to WWII in Nazi Germany and Japan.
In fact, Europe is already doing so with their militarization budget. In China, anecdotally, I am already seeing more and more military recruitment ads. Not surprising given the high rate of youth unemployment in China right now.
We are going to see more and more military build ups across the world as the global economy enters a recessionary phase.
I see
I hope we don’t get into another world war. But there are some serious parallels with the 1920s-30s right now…
Even history can't stop making remasters instead of new IPs
Same here in Canada re: military budget and military recruitment ads (targeted too e.g. at natives)
If I get drafted my life is actually just over
take an officer or two with you 
They wouldn't dare, I'd kick their ass
Thank you for keeping me safe dirt owl. Guessing my therapist can vouch for my gender dysphoria too.
ty
idk how concerned I should be
It's always a good idea to maybe contact an org that might have your back if shit hits the fan, some kind of support network at least.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I’d be happy to help you in any way I can to leave the country if you ever felt the need. I’m sure others here could help too depending on the country you wanna go to or can go to.
Obviously nobody is doing a ground invasion of Iran. It's so annoying seeing people frame it this way. As has been mentioned all over already, they're going to do the air bombing campaign of Libya, Gaza, Vietnam, Korea, etc.
They don't need to do some meticulous ground invasion if their goal is just to reduce a society to rubble. They'll just drop bombs and fire missiles until people are dying of water-borne diseases.
We'll see. There are a lot of factors to consider, not just troops obviously. We'll have to wait and see if it has any real lasting impact.
It's still interesting to note how low the morale of US citizens is.
I'd say dying by nuke doesn't sound like a bad deal right now, honestly. Better than internment camp or wasting away as an elderly person in an isolationist society with no medical care or safety net after working constantly to make others rich. The problem is worldwide, too. It's not just the US.
hang in there, you ain't alone.
Draft me I'm normal I can be trusted with a tank
The US wasn't ready for Iraq and Afghanistan, either. I remember a general on TV saying we'd need 4 million troops to occupy Iraq. We had 4 million troops total stationed across the globe. Still, Bush decided to open up a second front.
The difference is in 2001 the US was at the height of it's power.
well, you've got to run out of violent sociopaths eventually
There's no shortage there. They just aren't interested in risking death.
Every one of you that has ever mocked a troop, ever shared that meme about serving crack before serving the country, or otherwise rebuffed the idea of yourself or someone else becoming a troop: your service has been noted.
They're so desperate I saw airforce recruiter pamplets in a tropical smoothie. I guess its the only branch appropriate for someone who likes "healthy" food and/or cold smoothies. (Funny since I briefly thought about the chairforce before realizing I didn't want to die for oil.)
Good, stay that way.
two dudes in glasses in the pic lol if I'm going to war I'm not doing it with my fucking glasses on
I know contacts will fuck you with chemical weapons in your eyes but tbh you're fucked then anyway and I need my peripheral vision and for my vision to not fall off my face
In basic they don't let you use contacts, they issue everyone who needs them identical glasses with identical sports straps.
If wartime I would recommend shatterproof eye protection, comes in shaded and unshaded, prescription and non-prescription. There's a reason why "operator" dudes all kind of end up looking the same, it's cuz that's what works.
How identical are we talking here? Just frames or lenses too?
As a long-time glasses wearer I don't imagine they'd be 100% identical, that would be near useless for most wearers who weren't like, -1 myopic if that were the only glasses provided.
Anyone with astigmatism or a higher prescription (probably starting at -3 and stronger) would be probably better off not wearing glasses at all than wearing mis-prescribed glasses, and at that point their eyesight would be too poor for standard activity.
Frames also need to increase in thickness as the prescription increases, because the lenses get proportionality thicker too. A thin frame will either be too narrow/weak to hold the lenses, and the overhanging glass is a physical hazard
Yeah, it would be stupid and counterproductive, but we're talking about the US military so I figured I'd ask.
load more comments
(1 replies)
hmm okay "standardized" would be a better word than "identical", I'm pretty sure they give you your specific prescription it's just that all the glasses look the same.
But have you considered them using ISIS + The Kurds?
Gil Barndollar is a former Marine officer and a current scholar of U.S. foreign policy and national security.
gil's been trying to get the draft reinstated for a long time.
i actually surprised myself by getting to the end of this piece. took a long time since i was shaking my head in disagreement every other line lol
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
119 points (98.4% liked)
news
24119 readers
788 users here now
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS