21
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 14 points 1 week ago

I hope the "Donald Trump Baby Blimp" makes an appearance at every place he visits :)

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

The bookie-supported mariachi band too.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

No, please don't mess it up. While he's off doing pomp and ceremony stuff, he doesn't have his fingers in policy. In fact, a full world tour of all British territory might be warranted.

[-] snaprails@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

I expect Starmer & Co. to make protest against the visit illegal if they can and as difficult as possible if they can’t. They won’t want to hear any dissent - although Starmer is so far up the Mango Mussolini’s arsehole he won’t hear it anyway.

[-] JohnSmith@feddit.uk 11 points 1 week ago

I’d still go with the earlier proposal: a lunch with Prince Andrew in Pizza Express in woking.

[-] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Can we grow a pair and tell this nutcase to get fucked instead? It's eternally frustrating to watch our politicians rush to rim this fascist.

[-] breecher@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

This is just yet another brexit benefit. They can't turn their backs on the US market.

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

No, thanks.

That place has to have some trap doors into a dungeon. Let’s go medieval.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately the pragmatic move given the orange toddler could crash our economy with just a single deranged tweet.

It is not worth it for Starmer to treat Trump like the piece of turd he is – crashing our economy and causing a rampant increase in poverty in the process – just so he can look based on twitter and Reddit for a few hours.

Wooing Trump while simultaneously becoming less reliant on the US and growing closer to the EU again is genuinely probably the only thing Kier is doing exceptionally well in right now, so I won't complain.

Still, I hope we see the return of that giant baby Trump balloon lol

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately the new nukes that fit to the f35 we agreed to buy from the US.

Require US permission to use. So we are far from reducing our reliance on them.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Do you have confirmation that they require US permission, or is it speculation? Because people have been saying similar things about things like Trident and F35s for years and they've been proven incorrect.

And that's just one thing. Broadly speaking we absolutely are reducing our reliance on them. Pointing out one area where we aren't isn't proof of a trend.

We've been ramping up UK production, BAE has been pushing to open more European factories, we've signed multiple defensive pacts, there's the European weapons programme, we're looking into adding more partners to our upcoming sixth-gen fighter jet programme, etc.

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago

Do you have confirmation

Just a news article. Can't even remember where I saw it. So yeah. You are likely correct.

That said. If the US refused to support the UK. I find it hard to believe we would not quickly have difficulties maintaing f35s. And given how much they really on software to fly. I'd be more surprised if the US did not have a backdoor.

I'd add that to anything the US sells that they would have reason to fear if turned against them.

I really think is the EU and or the UK want to be independent of the US. Arming with modern US weapons is about as safe as. Well issuing Chinese smart phones to all our politicians.

The US has never been entirely trust worthy when it comes to them Vs the world. Less so now.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

There is no backdoor. We do not have the export variant of the F35 with US-controlled software. The software on our F35s (and Trident missiles) is British. This came as the result of concerns New Labour had about the very thing you mention - US backdoors.

And I agree that the US cannot be trusted. Thankfully our sixth gen fighters have no US ties, and most of our other recent military developments aren't either. For the time being, though, we can't really abruptly scrap trident or F35s, despite maintenance not being 100% done here (particularly for Trident). Our missiles only need maintenance every 10 years - I'd hope we have facilities to do that domestically by then.

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Is this because Mr Blobby retired?

[-] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

He'll make sure to schedule a private party with Prince Andrew and a couple of 12 year olds.

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

On the positive side, UK to distract Trump from MAGA crap for a week.

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

5051 readers
226 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS