388
No trickle... (feddit.org)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 41 points 4 months ago
[-] Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 36 points 4 months ago

Unironically, it used to be called "Horse and Sparrow Economics," with the rich eating grains, and the poors pecking their meals from the horseshit.

True story

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago

"Thank you my liege"

[-] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago
[-] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago
[-] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I'm not quite at the bottom but I can see it from here.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The SP500 hitting highs is a lot less good news when you realize most of that is simply due to the dollar devaluing against other international currencies.

That isn't asset appreciation, it's currency devaluation.

EDIT:

I m on mobile and don't have the ability to make my own chart with DXY and SP500 normalized to each other, but uh...

https://portfolioslab.com/tools/stock-comparison/%5EDXY/SPY

Look at this in YTD, then in 1Y, then 5Y.

Normally, these two things move in the same dirrction, though the SP500 tends to grow much more when the DXY grows a little.

Well, now, basicslly since Trump took office, they're moving in the opposite direction.

So, yeah, this is now what is called a 'melt up', where stocks climb higher, but not because of any kind of underlying fundamental strength of the US economy but because the USD has lost about 10% of its value compared to the currencies it most often is traded against.

[-] iii@mander.xyz 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

When the nixon administration abandoned the gold standard, stock prices rose, too. It's the same mechanism: avoid having cash as the currency devalues.

Is it atypical to learn this in school?

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago

In American schools?

Normal public schools?

Economics is an elective, only available at fairly good schools, usually only taken by overachievers.

Most US Public schools don't even teach the basics of taxes or finances as it applies to an average person who is going to like, work a job that is taxed, buy a car with a loan.

Our education system has been intentionally destroyed by Republican s for decades, the result is that roughly within +/- 2 years of when I graduated college... US average adult literacy rate has been plummeting.

The average US adult now reads at a 6th grade level, average math skills are also terrible.

Uneducated people are easier to lie to and trick.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] percent@infosec.pub 21 points 4 months ago

Sadly, Americans are groomed at a young age to dive deep into debt early in life. It has become normalized for most of the population to carry some form of debt (credit cards and student loans are popular choices).

Most people don't even bother making a budget — a task that only needs to be done once a month, and is easier now than ever, thanks to technology.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

Try and make a budget for minimum wage. Many people can't afford to live even meagerly.

Why bother budgeting if you're just going to lose anyway?

[-] rozodru@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I have, I mean you kinda HAVE to budget what little you bring in to ensure you don't end up on the streets. and it's not even about saving. saving was just a pipe dream. budgeting was just to ensure rent got paid, bills were paid, and I was able to eat sometimes.

I know people who make 6 figures and can't/won't budget and most live paycheque to paycheque or are absolutely broke just before their next direct deposit. I worked with a guy that made 6 figures and all the time just before payday he'd bum me for cigarettes or ask if I could buy him a coffee or a sandwich cause he had NOTHING. And this was a guy that would always have the latest tech shit, videogames on day one of release - like all of them, nice clothes, etc. just spend, spend, spend.

I've known more people who SHOULD be well off that don't budget and are constantly broke than people who make minimum wage and are surviving.

[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 6 points 4 months ago

Budget? You pay what bills are most important now, and just buy the cheapest food possible. That's all there is to it :/

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] percent@infosec.pub 7 points 4 months ago

...You assume that I haven't? I originally had to learn to budget when I was making less than minimum wage, to avoid homelessness. Budgeting can be even more important with less money.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

You can't budget your way out of poverty. If income doesn't cover base survival, you simply are fucked.

There are surely people out there whose failure to plan has put them into a horrible and avoidable situation. But there are many more who make good choices and still end up horribly in debt. And for them, what's the point? Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

[-] BigPotato@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I mean, to reduce your losses? I've had a budget balance out red, compared my options and been incredibly lucky. I would not have been quite as lucky if I'd just said 'fuck it' and zero'd out the balance.

Billionaires shouldn't exist, social support structures should be stronger, I have only succeeded based on community and relationships... But you gotta try at least.

[-] iii@mander.xyz 4 points 4 months ago

Self fulfilling profecy

[-] discount_door_garlic@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Most people don’t even bother making a budget — a task that only needs to be done once a month, and is easier now than ever, thanks to technology.

Avoidable debt and spending beyond means are one thing, but budgeting only helps so much when the cost of essential goods has skyrocketed, rent is out of control, and pay is all but stagnant. I applaud the sound financial advice of making a simple personal budget, but the problem is (for most people) far, far greater than credit card debt at the stage people are BNPL groceries...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rozodru@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

Canadian here, what's "AfterPay"? and PLEASE don't tell me it's like layaway or a payday loan or something.

[-] Denalduh@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

That's exactly what it is.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Yeah, basically a payday loan you can do from your phone. I'm sure this won't crash the economy.

[-] Seefoo@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Legit rules of the trickle

  1. Trickle tomorrow
  2. No trickle? See Rule 1
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Where’d this stat come from. Looking around and another site says 25% made payments for groceries. Another site says 60% split payments when buying - not just for groceries. So I sincerely doubt the stat of 60% making payments just for groceries.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This comment on the post indicates that it's a CitizenWatch article, but that article's own listed sources don't support the 60% number either (as I call out in my response to that comment).

I swear there's barely anywhere online anymore where people practice basic skepticism. If it aligns with their existing biases they just slurp it up, no matter how absurd.

[-] brot@feddit.org 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah, that statistic is obviously bullshit and people here should notice. They really should notice

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Should’ve been 96% or something—the same as the percentage of people I hope realized the number couldn’t possibly be accurate. Make it truly absurd if it won’t be accurate!

@NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org might consider swapping the image with an edit or adding brackets after the title or something - know you’re just resharing fuňe meme

[-] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago

A split payment doesn't necessarily mean being destitute either. My wife and I keep our finances separate and do split payments when we go grocery shopping together.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 4 months ago

By "trickle down", they meant "pissing in your mouth, peasants", FYI.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

No, that's disgusting.

Trickle-down is a perfectly wholesome synonym for horse-and-sparrow economics, so named because sparrows pick undigested oats out of horseshit. Why'd you have to go and make it gross?

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 months ago

Daily reminder that "higher GDP is good for the economy" is now a wildly disproven myth from the days before economics was a science, by a guy who said we'd get a 15 hour work week.

Monetary inflation is bad. The nitwits who jump in saying "ackchually velocity" are suckers who paid to learn the lie, whose jobs may depend on the lie, and would be very embarrassed to be wrong. Bailouts weren't the exception - they're the rule.

We've been robbed by the 0.1% and don't need to take it anymore.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago

Adding to this: GDP only measures the amount of money spent on stuff, not the actual value of the things. That's one of the reasons that makes economists think untouched nature is bad, it doesn't contribute to the GDP

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Flagg76@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

That's by design, the money flows from the average American to the companies. Then slowly trickles into the pockets of the ceo's.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 10 points 4 months ago

Oh, I feel something trickling down alright.

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 7 points 4 months ago

What? You can pay using your ass?

[-] plyth@feddit.org 6 points 4 months ago

It's trickle up. You can see the cone in section 2. Increase h and the trickle trickles.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Weird stat aside, I was watching a podcast with Scott Galloway yesterday and he made a comment about Jerome Powell bringing inflation down to 2% without triggering a recession, and I had to facepalm. The rich, even those with a shred of empathy, are massively out of touch with what the 99% are experiencing right now.

[-] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago

It's like Robin Hood in reverse.

[-] NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org 2 points 4 months ago

Robin Socks

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 4 months ago

Me, off in the corner believing debt is immoral

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

What kind of debt? Is it immoral to owe someone a favour? Or is it immoral for someone to owe you a favour?

Is it only immoral if there's interest? If someone lends someone $500 to cover rent, that's immoral? Is it more or less immoral to watch someone lose their housing when you could have helped?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Society legitimately cannot function without debt. I agree giving people predatory "micro loans" for groceries is dystopian but every society that has discovered agriculture has also discovered the concept of debt because it's a natural consequence of an economic order so tied to seasonal cycles. Interest is also not bad, and every society that has developed debt has also quickly developed interest. Societies that have religious prohibitions or taboos against interest find workarounds because it's proven to be a critical part of how economics works. Personally I am glad that I was able to buy a house for hundreds of thousands of dollars I don't have yet because I will be able to pay off that in time and I appreciate that the bank is willing to lend me that money for such a long time at a relatively low rate of return for them. The Soviet Union even had banks that offered loans with interest but they were run by the State. It's kind of unavoidable.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 4 months ago

Why was your house worth hundreds of thousands of dollars? Because we use debt. How do you think people lived for thousands of years? Home mortgages weren't a normal thing until like 100 years ago

Societies without it found workarounds, because it's easy. It's tempting. It's a money dupe glitch combined with gambling. If anyone uses it, they get an insurmountable advantage over all players who don't. It's moloch, it's the demon of racing to the bottom

You should not be able to spend your future

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
388 points (98.7% liked)

memes

18399 readers
730 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS