-20
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) by DominatorX1@thelemmy.club to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

EDIT Ok so it's just the trolly problem.

EDIT2 : AHA War Games 1983. "The only winning move is not to play." (We might call this the final product of a lot of smart philosophical digestion, because it's a famous movie). There's always the perfectly valid option to ditch the riddle. (Because maybe the riddle is dumb, or maybe the riddle is no better than a thousand others, utilitywise )

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 18 points 19 hours ago

OP, whatever you are on, don't use it ever again. There is no reason to think that torturing and killing kids will solve global warming. In short, it is a useless hypothetical that adds nothing to the discussion about solving the problem. Meaning it useless, while you get to pretend that you are somehow smart. Newsflash: you are not.

[-] DominatorX1@thelemmy.club -2 points 18 hours ago

It's insight like that. Thanks

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 day ago

Trolley problem is a bullshit in the first place, just as your "what if" nonsense. Millions of innocent children are dying and being tortured already by the capitalism, which is also main cause of global warming.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 19 hours ago

what if the world was made of pudding?

[-] CraigCabbage@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago

Were you on drugs? Of course that's not okay.

[-] DominatorX1@thelemmy.club 0 points 18 hours ago

It's the trolly problem. So yr spending 100 to save a million

[-] DarthPub@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

Someone watched the good place

[-] DominatorX1@thelemmy.club 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

No I never saw "the good place".

But I've seen a dozen other things that touch this idea.

One I really like is "Utopia". 2013. British. Good music.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago

we're already torturing and murdering millions of innocent children in gaza, africa and southeast asia and we're actively enabling climate change to maintain american dominance; is that okay?

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Which is ironically undermining American dominance

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 hours ago

only because of gaza and even then only because of tiktok. after all: we've been murdering millions of across the entire world to maintain our comfort and none of it got anywhere near as much attention as it does now because of social media platforms that were not controlled by our oligarchy. ie tiktok.

emphasis is "were not controlled" because tiktok is very much under control now.

[-] lattrommi@lemmy.ml 3 points 19 hours ago

I have only tortured children as a passenger in an automobile, using flatulance and automatic window locks. I have not murdered anyone. I have never used ticktalk.

It irritates me a lot when people use 'we' and 'our' in contexts that include me, when they do not apply to me.

So to rephrase your first comment in this chain:

The american government, via israeli and other proxy and puppet armies they have created, are already torturing and murdering millions of innocent children in gaza, africa and southeast asia and unchecked capitalist corporations, both american and international, are actively enabling climate change to maintain american military dominance to serve as their shield from the people who resist; is that okay?

The answer is: No.

I have not been comfortable for a long time, figuratively and literally, long before I ever heard about gaza, since before I was considered an adult, a few weeks prior to 9/11.

I have protested in many ways since then, with several years incarcerated because of it.

I have lived an impoverished life by american standards, although not the same level of poverty as other places, by several orders of magnitude for some places.

It is the billionaire kleptocracy that is controlling the country I am trapped in, that is causing climate change. Not me, with my lack of using fossil fuels whenever I had the choice, eating locally grown as much as available, avoiding supporting the worst companies such as big oil and the process and/or fast food complex.

Sorry for the rant. Like I said, I really hate when people say 'we' and it includes me.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Fleur_@aussie.zone 13 points 1 day ago

Jesse, what the fuck are you talking about???

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Not sure, but definitely made a lot of people think

[-] Fleur_@aussie.zone 6 points 22 hours ago

Yeah like "wtf is op on?"

[-] A_Wild_Zeus_Chase@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

What if we had to torture and murder you to solve global warming? Would that be ok?

[-] redlemace@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

At one hand I'd say : you really need (mental)help

At the other hand .... Global warming is doing just that.

So if it's guaranteed global warming is reversed and not starts over, one could reason it's justified (biggest question, which/who's children is it ghonna be)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Outdoor_Catgirl@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

You don't have to do that.

[-] lattrommi@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

If they are going to be living short lives in tortuous conditions thanks to climate change anyways, than yes. Otherwise no.

Could we maybe substitute the children with the one million richest people on the planet?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] megopie@beehaw.org 7 points 1 day ago

We don’t need to. We just need to stop letting business interests direct economic priority.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DarthPub@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

The children aren’t the problem. Fix (or preferably knock down) corporate and authoritarian structures and we can avoid destroying the environment and committing atrocities against youth.

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago

Are we witnessing the DNC forming their 2028 presidential platform here in real time? I can't wait to have a bunch of right-wing liberals tell me why murdering millions of kids is absolutely necessary and that I'm obviously a conservative Russian plant for not supporting it.

[-] DominatorX1@thelemmy.club 0 points 22 hours ago

It's the trolly problem. A classic.

[-] Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 hours ago

What do you think is the use of trolley problems?

[-] Outwit1294@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

If there is absolutely no other option, yes. Even dropping nukes over the whole earth is okay if that solves a massive long term problem.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
-20 points (29.2% liked)

Asklemmy

49481 readers
509 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS