69
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by signaljam@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Hey, everyone. If you're looking for a fresh privacy podcast, we recently started a new one called Signal Jam.

Here's a bit about why we made Signal Jam and what we're hoping to do differently.

We even have preliminary ways for you to participate in the project, which you can read about here.

Feel free to connect with us on Proton, Tuta, Signal, or here on Lemmy. Looking forward to your feedback and thoughts!

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] StormyBeavers7455@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Just wanted to say this is great. Awesome initiative, looking forward for new episodes!

[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Appreciate the enthusiasm! Thanks for following along. Feel free to provide feedback, and if you feel so inclined, consider participating in the project!

-M

[-] lock@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

Shouldn't the podcast about passwords and 2FA be called "Security 101" instead of "Privacy 101"? How is that related to privacy? You should have two sections for your episodes: one for privacy and one for security.

[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

Totally valid point, and just to be ultra clear: yes, this episode was more security focused, technically speaking. Good privacy starts with good security. We're hoping that newcomers to the space who are primarily interested in privacy as a topic start with that principle in mind. We tried, as best we could, to avoid dropping the word "privacy" throughout this episode in an effort to create that distinction.

Thanks for the call out! You're right to be mindful that these are related but separate concepts.

-M

[-] pineapple@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I agree. Passwords and 2fa definetly leans more on the security side rather than privacy. It's important to keep these two terms destinct.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Cool idea and will check it out later. I also found a small grammatical error.

While we ~~try~~ strive to make original content and refresh old topics, we can't cover everything, and we can't be everywhere.

I assume you would want to strike "try", but I suppose you could strike "strive" instead.

Edit - I made a word salad on a post about a grammatical error, go me!

[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago

Funny how sometimes you miss silly things like this even after proofreading so many times... thank you! Fixed. 🙂

[-] rutrum@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago

Im glad you are not over ambitious with your schedule. An episode every three weeks / month is a great way to keep going. I remember when privacy guides said they were going to do a "this week in privacy" which unfortunately lasted about 6 weeks. I wish you best of luck!

[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Appreciate the feedback! We care about producing quality rather than quantity. As I mentioned in our Welcome post, we don't view ourselves as content creators in the contemporary sense, and we don't want that associated pressure to constantly pump out new stuff. We hope the project gains enough international relevancy and appeal that we can bring in other contributors (which might result in more frequent episodes/posts), but for now, slow and steady is the goal.

-M

[-] Blaze@piefed.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Hello,

Thank you for sharing this, feel free to crosspost to !privacy@programming.dev for additional reach

[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

Hey, will do! Thanks!

[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

This looks cool. Thank you for creating and sharing! I've added to my (privacy-respecting, I think) podcast app of choice and will give a listen.

[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

Thanks for following! Out of curiosity, what's your preferred podcast client?

[-] clb92@feddit.dk 1 points 1 day ago

I'm not the person you asked, but I self-host AudioBookShelf (it's a podcast manager too), and listen to all my podcasts through its app, connected to my instance. Its app isn't as sleek or fast as Antennapod or some or the other ones, but it works fine.

That way I also automatically have all my podcasts backed up on my server too, if the creator of a podcast I listen to suddenly decides to delete everything and disappear.

[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

Ooooh, this is interesting, and I like the backup feature. Since you mention it...I have to ask... you don't happen to have the coveted Episode 306 from Bazzell's show, do you?

-M

[-] clb92@feddit.dk 1 points 5 hours ago

Nope, never heard of that podcast, sorry.

[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Well I just went down the rabbit hole to verify that my podcast app is simply that, and not tracking tons of data to send back to who knows where. I had been using Overcast but a few months ago changed to RSS Radio after reading a recommendation - perhaps on Reddit? RSS Radio now seems to be all but disavowed by both Dorada Software, who links from the site for it, and Maple Media Apps, LLC, who is the publisher on the app store. The app privacy cards on the iOS App Store do not instill a ton of confidence, showing: Data Used to Track You (Identifiers, Usage Data) and Data Linked to You (Usage Data)

Perhaps it's time to switch... Podverse is at least open source, although they track Usage Data and link Contact Info to you. But good ol' Overcast only has a card for Data Not Linked to You, which seems like a big improvement.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago

AntennaPod is the obligatory open source client.

[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I'm still on iOS (I know - don't yell at me) but thinking to make moves soon. I trust Android less than iOS, but perhaps GrapheneOS or something else will be for me. I'm always open to recommendations (with a minimum of yelling).

[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No stress! I was on iOS for a really long time, mostly out of entrenched habits, and trepidation into jumping into something like GrapheneOS. However, I did end up making the switch to Graphene, and arguably with the most restrictive settings (no Google Play Services, no Aurora Store, etc.). There was a small learning curve, maybe about a week or so, but in hind sight, it's one of the best privacy decisions I've made to date. Feel free to reach out to me on Signal or one of emails if you have questions or want to talk more in depth about it!

-M

[-] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago

USE GRAPHENEOS

[-] jinx@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago
[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The holy Data Not Collected card!

[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago
[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Good on you for the thorough research, and I like your logic. Things change fast, and it's good to have backups in place. Overcast would probably be my choice if using iOS. I wish there were more open source and privacy-friendly versions available.

-M

[-] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

This looks cool, I'll give it a listen later. Wish you good luck with this

[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

Thank you! Feel free to leave us feedback and share what you'd like to hear more about down the road.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

Listened to the first episode and I don't have any negative feedback. You might consider running your audio through Auphonic. Really great hands-off editor that can take quality to another level. But it's fine as is.

[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the feedback and suggestion! I'll look into Auphonic a bit and maybe do some experimenting.

-M

[-] crozilla@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago
[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

Hah! Good catch! Fixed. Thank you! 🙂

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Much disappointment. Could have been signalj.am

[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago

I agree. Unfortunately .am TLDs do not support WhoIs privacy. ☹️

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 days ago

imo you should not promote signal, proton, or tuta for various reasons including the ones i mention in those three links.

[-] signaljam@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

Hey, Arthur— thanks for dropping these links. Jay and I will look at these and consider your thought process, and might reach out to follow up, if that's okay! If I may ask, what do you prefer for email and RTC?

-M

[-] stupid_asshole69@hexbear.net 2 points 19 hours ago

I only read the signal link you posted, but the first link inside it complains that the signal server needs to know a users ip and that could be used to connect people and users. Ip addresses are required to send data. Ip obfuscation is insanely out of scope for a messenger.

The second link complains about sealed sender not failing closed which is true (or was true at the time) but also a reasonable compromise to prevent abuse and avoid it constantly failing and requiring new expirable tokens.

These are not reasons to not use or even not recommend signal. A person who is taking recommendations to increase their privacy should not be worried about those concerns.

Removing oneself from public records (or taking greater control over what surfaces in public records about oneself) is infinitely more important than expecting ip obfuscation or sealed sender from signal.

I am not making this reply to start an argument and will not engage in one. The point is to help readers understand that your concerns about signal are esoteric.

[-] pineapple@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I think signal, proton and tuta are totally fine for most peoples threat model unless they feel they need the extra privacy.

If we want everyone to value privacy then we need to onboard them with easy to use and accessible services first and then they can take steps further if they want.

[-] appropriateghost@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

It's difficult enough for getting people to switch from whatsapp to signal.

I don't know how successful i'd be to get people to switch to simplex.

Is there a particular reason that you don't recommend signal?

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

What alternatives would you recommend?

[-] twikz@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Matrix is open source, should give that a try,

it could be a bit more user friendly tho

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

The fact that Matrix was developed in Israel instantly kills it for me.

[-] twikz@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure it was developed in germany

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

No Matrix was developed by Amdocs, an Israeli company. It has moved to Europe afterwards (I recall UK but might be wrong about that part)

Element is a Matrix client.

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
69 points (96.0% liked)

Privacy

40219 readers
771 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS