I forget where I heard this analogy, but it's like giving a bulletproof vest to someone on their way to shoot up a school.
What I love about this picture is if you zoom in you can tell her face couldn't have a more bored expression
You know who 'murikkkans despise more than Trump and the Republicans? The weak ass, spineless, do nothing, stand for nothing, fqracking Democratic Party.
There were over 500 other politicians who endorsed this; but I think she built her brand among those who feel particularly betrayed. And there is also a dose of misogamy, here and there.
But why do people feel so betrayed after older votes and actions should have triggered this much earlier? And will most of this go away soon?
Hatred of marriage?
She became a strikebreaker three years ago. Kshama Sawant: Rail Workers Betrayed By Biden & The “Squad”
AOC justified her vote by claiming she was fighting “tooth and nail” for the additional sick days. Jamaal Bowman claimed he was “always fighting in solidarity with the workers.” But what the Congressional “Progressive” Caucus pulled was a con job, and a hamfisted one at that. They colluded with Pelosi to separate out the vote into two, promising their roughly 100 votes on the rotten TA in exchange for a separate vote on the sick day amendment, which they knew full well would get crushed in the Senate. It took only one day to confirm the brutal reality: that the majority of the “Squad,” in coordination with the leaders of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, sold rail workers down the river while blowing smoke about paid sick days.
On November 30, Democratic Socialists of America’s (DSA) national center posted a statement of support for the rail workers which included this sentence:
“Any member of Congress who votes yes on the tentative agreement is siding with billionaires and forcing a contract on rail workers that does not address their most pressing demand of paid sick days.”
What then of their own members and endorsed elected officials in Congress who voted yes? What this statement implies, and what the actions of the “Squad” definitively prove, is that these elected officials are, and see themselves as, part of the capitalist state, the state that acts for the billionaires and against the interests of the majority, the working class.
A socialist cannot be a strike breaker. This needs to be the end of any pretense by DSA that the “Squad” is socialist, and should result in their expulsion from the organization. Failing that, the Squad’s betrayal of the working class becomes DSA’s betrayal.
But why do people feel so betrayed after older votes and actions should have triggered this much earlier? And will most of this go away soon?
Many still hope for the magical day when the dems become something that they structurally cant be. They love the idea more than the fact, of what these people represent. Same with Mamdani, tbh. People will be very heartbroken about him soon enough.
Too much "benefit of the doubt" is given, too much projection and power-level hiding cope and "they mean well". They long to be heard and hear screams in whimpers.
We have very few progressive voices in the government, it sucks to have them betray principles we thought they had
They are politicians and they all get elected based on lies to their base.
AOC didn't even grow up in Bronx and campaigned hard on her being a girl from Bronx. If she was willing to lie about where she grew up, why wouldn't she spout bullshit to appeal to her constituents?
AOC calls herself a Bronx girl but also as far as i can tell, always admitted that while being born in the Bronx she moved to a nearby town as a child and went back and forth regularly to see family there. I'm not from NY so maybe I'm not the one to ask, but it doesn't seem that wild that she considers the Bronx part of her personality.
I'd rather be mad at her for substantive things like this vote.
Well born in the Bronx. It's not technically a lie, but it's misleading. Cozying up with Mama Bear Pelosi says it all, though.
Wait we have at least one ? A real one?? Where??!
"progressive" doesn't mean "leftist". Sometimes they agree on policy, but the progressive is just a brand of liberal. I mean, we're talking about a term embraced by Teddy Roosevelt and prohibitionists
ish
Shrugs
That post was nine days ago… coincidence?
The hypocrisy of that instance is stunning.
Incivility? I've never seen that from this user. Nor whining and complaining in lieu of self-validation or self-reflection. In fact, the time we got into a conversation about pogroms, I found them extremely respectful and informative, as well as in good faith.
Same, I liked geneva. He's modding the "europe" sub on lemmy.ml.
https://lemmy.world/c/europe@lemmy.ml
subscribed. Maybe its a good thing to see patterns of threads where mods pull this stuff. We know where to unsubscribe.
Anytime you send weapons to theocracies, people die. Religions are never happy with what they have, because a fictional god gave them the entire world. So they fight, kill, and die for their fictional gods.
NEVER send weapons to theocracies.
Iran is a theocracy, and I’d send them nukes if I had any.
Religion is less of a factor in state geopolitical decision-making than you think.
It’s just one facet of the superstructure among many.
we send tons of weapons to isreal and they're a theocracy.
The problem with Israel isn't Judaism. Israel doesn't even follow the Halakha. Israel is a racist settler colony most similar to Apartheid South Africa. Without religion you still have politicians in New Zealand attempting to pass racist laws.
This might destroy you from the inside but Israel is an Atheist state. The only Judaism they believe in is being racially descended from Jews.
https://vridar.org/2017/05/26/we-do-not-believe-in-god-but-he-nonetheless-promised-us-palestine/
AOC is trying to whip up funds for when she runs next election. I'm not too thrilled that she voted against cutting funds for Israel weapons. What was she thinking. So dumb, and felt like a betrayal.
She voted against reduced funding for weapons for Israel because she would have been voting FOR funds for weapons for Israel. If she had the option to eliminate funding of weapons for Israel completely she would have supported that.
Years from now people could look back and say "AOC in 2025 voted to supply Israel with XXX million dollars of weapons while they were in the middle of destroying Gaza, and attacking Syria and Iran."
Would you really vote to supply weapons to Israel at this point in time?
She voted against reduced funding for weapons for Israel because she would have been voting FOR funds for weapons for Israel.
Thats not what I read about what she claimed were her motivations. She said she voted against it because she was in favor of giving them defensive weapons, but not offensive ones. As if the money to buy weapons wasnt easily moved from one to the other. Weapons are weapons.
"Marjorie Taylor Greene’s amendment does nothing to cut off offensive aid to Israel nor end the flow of US munitions being used in Gaza. Of course I voted against it"
Does that mean she would vote for giving "densive weapons" to Russia? What about Iran? So-called defensive weapons just allow impunity to use offensive weapons. It's like giving a bulletproof vest to a school shooter.
So what did it cut off?
And why did four "progressive Democrats" vote for it?
Yeah... Now post the rest.
AOC's own statement expressed that she opposed eliminating funding of weapons to Israel.
Americans democrats act toward democratic politicians like a domestic abuse victims acts toward his abuser.
Yes i know your ex is worse. Yes i know we don't know them like you do. I'm sure they cried after they gave you your third black eyes this month.