Hahah... Check his hard drives...
Victim blaming. Awesome. Great family they've got there
She's going to testify Trump did nothing, get her clemency, then suicide herself while in minimum security
Behind the ~~Batards~~Bastards did two episodes on Ghislan's and Ian's father, Robert Mawell. Seems the whole family are demon spawn.
Behind the Batards
I'm on a low carb diet, if I watch that it'll just make me want bread
It'll be fine, it's about the low carb food hiding behind them
While it has been reported that his name features heavily in the papers, there is no suggestion that Trump was involved in any criminality.
wut
He was literally proven in court guilty of rape, in the defamation case.
But not related to Epstein's case right?
That's why it matters if they release all the files or just the ones Trump okays.
Correct. He is a convicted rapist though the actual legal language is different because he's rich, but not a convicted paedo...yet.
I don't have faith this will happen, but do have hope.
Not guilty in the legal sense, but it was a finding of fact that sealed his liability for defamation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump
renewing her claim of defamation and adding a claim of battery under the Adult Survivors Act, a New York law allowing sexual-assault victims to file civil suits beyond expired statutes of limitations
A jury verdict in May 2023 found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll, and ordered him to pay US$5 million in damages.
Regarding the jury verdict, the judge asked the jury to find if the preponderance of the evidence suggested that Trump raped Carroll under New York's narrow legal definition of rape at that time, denoting forcible penetration with the penis, as alleged by the plaintiff;[d] the jury did not find Trump liable for rape and instead found him liable for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. In July 2023, Judge Kaplan said that the verdict found that Trump had raped Carroll according to the common definition of the word, i.e. not necessarily implying penile penetration.[e] In August 2023, Kaplan dismissed a countersuit and wrote that Carroll's accusation of rape is "substantially true".
The official finding of the jury was that he was "liable" for sexual assault. The rest of it, I think pretty much speaks for itself. I would summarize that as him being proven in court to be guilty of rape, other people might have other wordings or summaries. Whatever.
Ah ah - right, I failed to recognize that the suit in question was a civil suit seeking damages for battery.
Still, my original statement is true: not 'guilty' in a legal sense (I added quotes here for clarity). 'Guilty' implies a criminal trial, which that one was not.
Like I say, other people might have other wordings or summaries. Honestly hair-splitting about it just pisses me off. A court proved that, by the normal-human definitions of these words, he's guilty of rape. How's that?
That's not to mention the many, many allegations of rape, sexual assault, and child rape that other people have credibly raised. That's just the time that it's been proven in court with him having every opportunity to vigorously defend himself against the allegation, and failing.
The legal system is all about hair-splitting.
He was literally proven in court guilty of rape, in the defamation case.
In court, he was found liable for sexual abuse. Colloquially and in reality, he is guilty of rape. It is important not to conflate the two.
"Your honor, would a "monster" help her wealthy pedophile boyfriend secure underage girls for his trafficking network?"
What’s with the push to platform this guy?
I just assume they couldn't find any other living person who wants Maxwell to be pardoned.
🎹 Only a monster... can't call another monster 'monster.' 🎹
They aspire to their dad's pension-fund-looting level of assholery.
Sounds like someone needs a visit to the MDC
The Manitoba Development Center?
The man don'tbe corporealanymore center
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.