bash their legs on the tow hitch

I doubt that very much, see as it's practically at eye-level.

Well, it is a Dodge so it is likely broken down and needs an engine or transmission, or both.

For instance my wrangler is limited to about 80 through the engineering of a low power engine and the wind resistance of a cardboard box.

The arguments made for bicycles being speed limited make sense, because it's not just about licensing requirements (what precious few there are...) but also mechanical limits on safe operation and a need to find a balance between individual freedom and public safety.

This is also the reason why, in Europe at least, all trucks have a 90 km/h governor by law, even though truck drivers are licensed to a higher standard than car drivers.

Cars being excluded from the conversations we are having about trucks and bicycles and motorcycles is nothing but pure hypocrisy. But then again, when has hypocrisy ever stopped a politician?

I've got a license to drive heavy-weight vehicles, I should be allowed to ride my ebike at 90km/h, pretty please?

We're mostly trained to drive at 60kmph and not 150kmph, yet there's no limiter at 90kmph.

But yes i agree, these rule are to protect the rider, not others, just like the mandatory helmet rule on moped and motorcycle.

Cars operate in pedestrian spaces all the time.

Furthermore, in contrast to a car, I see people in bycicles and even ebikes far less willing to brake for any obstacles or civilians in their path. This is because they are less adept at accelerating and braking, so they want to conserve momentum above all else. They also have less visibility at a glance given how bad or completely absent most bicycle mirrors are, and maintaining stability, having to operate the pedals, and having to turn your head and body far more often while being in a far more uncomfortable position makes for a far more stressed operator.

I've always considered it absurd that scooters can't have seats in a lot of countries, this is the one thing bicycles and ebikes get right and it allows for a safer ride with the possibility to rest from the stress of it. Being able to walk and use the road shouldn't be a vehicle training issue, it should be road education training issue. Speed, that is one that varies significantly, like Germany's autobahn shows. Cars can receive traffic tickets and revoking licenses. On an ebike, there isn't a license to revoke, and 25km/h is already considerably dangerous to bystanders, specially coming from a vehicle that far from being designed and tested for collisions is a mesh of protruding elements instead that also has the absence of an insurance provider for when accidents do happen

This is fuck cars, don't expect common sense to predominate, people here hate cars as if they were in a religion dedicated to it. I wonder how many just live in a bubble of privilege where the countries are wealthy enough to have the carless transit infrastructure and their lifestyles are sedentary enough and localized in a sufficiently centralized urban hub where they can actually hold those beliefs.

They also usually own firearms.

So should you (and know firearms safety)

This guy gets it.

A truck like that probably only can do 100mph maybe 120mph. A governor wouldn’t kick in until like 150mph. Most of the cars I have seen where it matters have a “track mode” to turn it off anyway.

The truck doesn’t have a motor at all. It’s got an engine.

I suggest you look up the number of peopls killed evey year by bicycles and compare it to the number killed by pickups. I'll wait.

The regulatory reasons are actually what the speed limit on bikes is about. Lots of places, once you're powered and going over 20mph they become motorcycles, meaning they can only be used on roads, require blinkers, brake lights, horns, registration, licensing, insurance, etc.

So the manufacturers have the motor cut off at 20mph to keep them classified as bicycles.

90 is too fast.