501
Gambits > Gambling (media.piefed.world)
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I wonder how the top chess players would do if there were random games where the rook, knight and bishop are reordered (still symmetrical though)

Is that a certain type of game that people do?

I imagine it would destroy most typical game patterns.

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 2 points 4 hours ago

"Freestyle" chess (aka "960" or "Fischer Random") has gained a lot of popularity lately. Big tournaments with big funding, spearheaded by Magnus Carlson.

It's what you're describing, except it's the entire back row, including the king and queen.

[-] kapulsa@feddit.org 10 points 11 hours ago

You will probably like this

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess960

There have already been championships and magnus carlsen is a great supporter of this version.

[-] chaos@beehaw.org 2 points 11 hours ago

I'm sure shuffled pieces have been a thing, there's also Really Bad Chess which gives you different piece quantities entirely.

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago

The amount of salt that would be thrown in the next game rule update for chess would be incredible.
can you imagine if FIDE went, "you know what, classical is now 960. There's no going back, that's the rule now"

They used to call the current version of chess "mad queens' chess"

During the 15th century, the queen's move took its modern form as a combination of the move of the rook and the current move of the bishop.[14] Starting from Spain, this new version – called "queen's chess" (in Italian, scacchi della donna) or, pejoratively, "madwoman's chess" (scacchi alla rabiosa) – spread throughout Europe rapidly, partly due to the advent of the printing press and the popularity of new books on chess.[15] The new rules faced a backlash in some quarters, ranging from anxiety over a powerful female warrior figure to frank abuse against women in general.[16]

Gamers being butthurt about patches? Never!

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 8 points 18 hours ago

What were the queens moves prior to this. And what did a pawn become when it reached the other side.

I remember people always saying you could choose what piece you wanted. Though everyone most always chose queen of course. Though I could see someone choosing knight in certain circumstances.

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_of_chess#History

A pawn originally did not have the option of moving two squares on its first move, and promoted only to a queen upon reaching the eighth rank. The queen was originally the fers or farzin, which could move one square diagonally in any direction.

In the Persian and Arabic game the bishop was a pīl (Persian) or fīl (Arabic) (meaning "elephant") which moved two squares diagonally with jump

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 15 hours ago

Knight is rarely a better choice indeed, and it might even be optimal to choose a rook or bishop in extraordinary circumstances, such as if choosing a queen leads to a draw

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 23 hours ago

Lmaoo, even ancient gamers were complaining about women in games

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

15th century is not ancient brah....

Although I'm sure people playing Ur were still mad.

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 23 hours ago

No I know, I just typed quickly and recklessly

Just pretend that the "ancient" in my comment meant like, "gamers 500 years in the past" or something

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 23 hours ago

Your quote never calls it mad queen, just queen or madwoman!

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)
  1. I misremembered

  2. I'm sure other sources have variants

  3. The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

By far the most unethical thing I ever did was working for a company that profited from football, baseball, Pokémon, and magic cards.

That shit is just straight up gambling.

They paid me a lot, but I hated it when I dug into the numbers. Once I saw how much customers were spending I noped out of that industry. The “whales” were spending easily 10-20k a week on cards, and way more when new products launched.

There were people who would group up and go in together, but that’s not who I’m talking about — these were individual people who spend all day buying packs hoping to strike it big — they had massive gambling addictions.

I don’t think regular collectors realize how many people get a cut before they can even profit off the card. When someone does nail a high dollar card they have to get it graded, then they take it to an auction house who keeps the bulk of the money just because they know the rich buyers. Because the packs are so expensive at the high end people buy them in groups, and that’s how we made our premiums.

Watch King of Collectibles on Netflix. I was in that field and in those circles. Look what Goldin tried to do to Logan Paul to try and trick him into selling his charzard for cheap — he talked him into losing a quarter million dollars then goes “want to sell me your charzard now?” Logan isn’t a great guy, but you can see how everything Goldin did was premeditated to make Logan feel like shit and less confident so he’d sell.

It makes me even sadder hearing about how Pokémon cards are instantly selling out to scalpers now. Gotta get those kids hooked early I guess. Plus the profit margins are even slimmer after scalping. You’ve basically got to convince buyers they’re lucky and will hit that big win instead of throwing more cash at their much more likely negative value buys.

I worked with guys with phds in economics trying to optimize just how much value they could extract on this.

I’m sure anyone reading this by now thinks I’m an awful human, and yeah I probably am.

I did quit after a relatively short tenure in that field. At the time it was really easy to pretend the average buyer is only buying a few packs and it was all just for fun, plus you’d hear stories about some kid making a ton of money from some rare card and helping their poor family. It made it easy to pretend it was okay and look the other way, but it’s like those an orphan crushing machine type stories, the whole thing was entirely unnecessary and more people lost money than ever will be helped.

I’ve only worked much much more socially responsible jobs since, I only take a job if I feel it serves some good now. That doesn’t undo the bad shit I did though.

And my advice to everyone out there: if you want to collect things, collect only for yourself. You will not get rich, and buying expensive things to collect is just feeding a system that only builds gambling addictions.

[-] SandmanXC@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Anime girl chess gacha when?

[-] Rose_Thorne@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Isn't that what some of those "Auto-Battlers" claim to be?

[-] thezeesystem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago

Oh! They finally made chess 2? Awesome!

[-] celeste@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

Me when I invent Tandem Chess with lootboxes🤑🤑🤑

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

Buuuuut, you can buy a vibrating anal plug 😏

It's the current meta

[-] SEND_BUTTPLUG_PICS@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

What if I already own one?

[-] Sonor@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

pics or it didn't happen

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Means you're a cheater

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
501 points (99.0% liked)

AnarchyChess

5828 readers
385 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
!Chess@lemmy.ml
!chessbeginners@sh.itjust.works

Matrix space

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS