84
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Conselheiro@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 days ago

ITT: people confusing remarks by a parlamentarian as official statements by the Ministry of Defense or the head of the executive.

The red line about deep strikes has been around ever since the beginning of the war, with only minor adjustment of nuclear policy since the Storm Shadow/ATACMS deployment back in November last year. Instead of nuclear war all we got was the live test of the Oreshnik.

The current Russian leadership is cautious to a fault when it comes to nuclear escalation. A single parlamentarian is not going to change that, and the headline is misleading. Instead of being smug about it for the 100th time since the beginning of the war, pray that the UA army doesn't get their hands on a dirty bomb.

[-] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 days ago

that is one of the two purposes of having nuclear weapons

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

oh no they will get strongly worded condemnations from world leaders

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 days ago
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Matriks404@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I see a flaw in this strategy.

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 5 days ago

Personally? I'm against the use of nuclear weapons in this way.

[-] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 41 points 5 days ago

me? im against crime. and I'm not afraid to admit it

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
84 points (83.3% liked)

World News

37408 readers
876 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS