61

Decentralized social network Mastodon says it can’t comply with Mississippi’s age verification law — the same law that saw rival Bluesky pull out of the state — because it doesn’t have the means to do so.

The social non-profit explains that Mastodon doesn’t track its users, which makes it difficult to enforce such legislation. Nor does it want to use IP address-based blocks, as those would unfairly impact people who were traveling, it says.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 19 points 1 month ago

We need more federation and P2P in everything.

[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 9 points 1 month ago

P2P! I have been screaming this into every forum at reddit since last piece of shit president was president. See? This is why!

[-] apftwb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

What P2P solutions exist that need more attention? I know PeerTube does some neat P2P stuff to keep server load down (if they ever had the traffic...)

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

There's going to come a point at which the Feds/States will lean on the ISPs to handle the censorship for them. We've had people all over the Nat Sec system staring at the "Great Firewall of China" and asking themselves "Can we get something like this over here?"

[-] hisao@ani.social 11 points 1 month ago

This is why it's perfect time to get some tech literacy regarding tor, i2p, yggdrasil, and shadowsocks. It's not perfect solution to use tech to circumvent restrictions that shouldn't be there in the first place, but sometimes it really comes to that point and it's really nice to have all systems ready!

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 8 points 1 month ago

Arguably though, at some point they'll just say "if we can't read your traffic, you can't use the Internet."

Which still isn't a problem, as I'm sure we can come up with a means to encrypt traffic to make it look entirely legitimate. But it's going to take a while.

[-] einlander@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

At that point people would probably go to a p2p adhoc wireless meshnet to bypass the ISPs entirely.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You mean "at which point, people will just say 'oh, ok'". (Assuming they even notice)

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago

"People" will just comply. Tech savvy people like us are the only ones that could circumvent it

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

One... Not so disappointing fact is that means at least the Internet will go back to the pre-social media era.

You can feel it here on Lemmy still. It exists.

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Yes it has its perks

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Except if the topic is wifi meshnets, no amount of tech savvyness will get you around an absence of other nodes nearby. General apathy is actually a huge problem here.

[-] Sl00k@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

I used to think about this via mesh networks as simply routers, but now with nostr, IPFS, atProto and that new BT messaging stuff Jack Dorsey is on. Technically you could utilize your phone as an access point to the mesh network as you move around the city and load all the comms in the background. The latency would be high, but it could work. Also with 5g tech nowadays long range mesh networks are much more feasible albeit probably expensive for a hobbyist.

[-] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Sneakernets, my friend. Never underestimate the bandwidth of a pocket full of microsd cards traveling on the subway.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] piecat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

All they have to do is send a few crews with log dipoles or yagis. Take a few operators down and charge them with terrorism or something and a critical mass will stop using it.

We have the tech for drones sweeping everything everywhere with sensors. Cameras, radios, microphones, IR...

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

At some point you're just going to need to start shooting the fascists

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ezyryder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

I'm making a website to aggregate all of this information. Pro net neutrality, anti censorship laymens guide. Still in the works but its called zoracle.life.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I've tried a few times to check out i2p, it seems to take hours of leaving it running to even get to the point where you can very slowly and inconsistently load even the official pages though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sylvieslayer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Hi I have no idea what any of that means. Please let me join this class.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] mitch@piefed.mitch.science 9 points 1 month ago

All my IT and InfoSec friends have called me alarmist for suggesting even the possibility of a GFW of America, but every day that passes, it looks more and more likely to happen, doesn't it?

Start practicing circumvention techniques now, y'all, while it's still legal and cheap to do so. Learn amateur radio. Learn Meshtastic. Learn all the different censorship-resistant VPN technology out there. Host your own websites or services for friends, family, or your community. It doesn't make it impossible, but it does make it hard, and fascism is nothing if not lazy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IllNess@infosec.pub 6 points 1 month ago

If this really about protecting kids, they could've done opt in blocking at the ISP level. Just a few new fields with ISPs and they have products that can take care of this already.

This is really about tracking every little thing you do online.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It's never really about the kids.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

Eventually it will be about restricting what we can access on the web.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

staring at the “Great Firewall of China” and asking themselves “Can we get something like this over here?”

I've just been assuming that was the goal all along.

Fifteen years ago, I said on Reddit, "The U.S. is trying to become like China before China can become like the U.S." Of course, I got buried.

[-] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I've been saying some combination of China and Russia personally. It's easier to parallel now after China took over Hong Kong. Those poor kids fought so hard.

People need to understand the fascists were watching those instances too and they learned from them. The last 15 years have been like a road map for how to handle dissent and protests in a way that keeps you in power.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

The more interesting question is, who would you arrest? Just ignore the law. It's unenforceable when it comes to the fediverse.

[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Would have been the smart move for business, too. Just don't comply until everyone else caves and then sue the state for favoring some businesses.

[-] limer@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I agree with mastodon, even though eventually Texas will enact similar legislation forcing me to use a vpn to read it

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Does the law in Mississippi apply to the geographic region and airspace, or only residents?

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

What's wrong with your own personal 2M band radio network? Or just bring back CB culture. It's in the name: Citizen's Band...

[-] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Last time i checked "states rights" didn't mean the right to impose your laws on people or businesses running out of other states.

If anyone from Mississippi wants to use our services I'm totally ready to ignore any and all laws that don't acknowledge to sovereignty of the net.

load more comments (2 replies)

Also states don't have one company to go after. It is nearly impossible to track down and file court orders for if your lucky non-profits in other countries.

Like I don't think there are many people that host Mastodon instances that will listen to a court order out of the goodness of there heart.

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

"Mississippi has a backwards-ass age verification requirement. We're not allowed to let users in from Mississippi. Verify you're not in Mississippi"

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
61 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

36748 readers
8 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS