142

Insulting doesn’t even come close to describing what’s wrong with this

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 44 points 1 week ago

This is like the the-plan episode with the gas station rebate, where customers could only take advantage of if they placed their form in a collection box hidden at the top of a mountain.

The best part was when he became good friends with the last two people and then told them there was no rebate box and the real rebate was the friends they made along the way and then they left only for the camera to pan over to the well hidden box

[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago
[-] dil@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

Nathan for you, iirc

[-] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Nathan For You, season one, episode four

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 42 points 1 week ago

What's especially insidious about this is that a lot of people won't go through the effort for a measly $1 credit. Imagine how much settlement money they ultimately won't pay because people aren't claiming it.

[-] Nacarbac@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago

And splitting that measly amount into four separate uses of a coupon code! Not only does that make it four times as annoying, but it means you need to give them more money four times anyway.

[-] Edie@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Up to $22 million it seems (random article)

[-] Blakey@hexbear.net 35 points 1 week ago

A coupon giving you 25 cents off four times is an advertising campaign not a settlement

[-] shath@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

the lawyers disagree actually and it is

[-] Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml 32 points 1 week ago

Another "cost of doing business" settlement. At least in Japan and Korea, the CEOs have to apologize and prostrate themselves before the public and ask forgiveness. In the US, they just add insult to injury.

[-] StillNoLeftLeft@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago

Reminds me of the thank you note we got here for work in the public sector. It was a "print yourself" note.

[-] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago
[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

chuds unironically buying nfts for their loved ones as a gift be like

[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago

Damn, 1 dollar? You can now buy that clove of garlic you’ve always wanted

[-] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

The system works, folks! edgeworth-shrug

[-] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago

I also got this exact email. Not a resident of California so I don’t even get the non expiring dollar, very cool

[-] nothx@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

I have a friend that take part in every single class action lawsuit they can. I never understood it because it's never more than a couple of bucks.

[-] abc@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

hey now i once got like $75 because there was a disk drive settlement and I, at the time, worked at a computer store that had a bunch in the back from teardowns.

anyways i used to do the same thing in HS. It was just easy to do a bunch and I always knew at best I'd be getting like a $0.50 check in the mail twenty weeks later, but it was so amusing just getting home one day and seeing I had a check in the mail for some damn settlement I'd forgotten about. Funnily enough I used to do the same thing but way more obsessively with free samples and my mother never let me live down the day a walking cane for blind people showed up & made me donate it to an assisted living community

[-] nothx@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

I respect the grift. Honestly, from the standpoint of sticking it to the corporation any way possible, I'm all for it.

[-] alexei_1917@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Hey, that still worked out, they probably needed that.

[-] fox@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

It's the hustle and the grindset

[-] larrikin99@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

best I ever got was a 4-pack of redbull I think.

[-] godlessworm@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

my sibling got like 1200 from a papa john's employee class action

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

Lol, I just commented about this and didn't see yours

[-] nothx@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah I just read another comment where someone brought up the same suit... I can't recall the specifics, but i stand corrected. There are definitely some outlier instances.

[-] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

I got $25 dollars once, it's absolutely worth it. Technically made over $100 an hour off that, lol.

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

Hey, I joined one against the Papa Johns when I worked there and got like $3000. People we were there longer got closer to $20k

[-] nothx@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

Interesting... I guess the employee class action lawsuit paid out more to less people then your average consumer class action.

Happy to hear you made out okay there, just hoping the damage was worth more...I can't recall what this situation was with Papa Johns, but you are the second command I saw about it.

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

It was failure to pay mileage minimums to drivers using their own vehicles (everyone). So the pot was split based on the amount of miles you were cheated out of based on length of employment.

The reason it was so high was that the management was told anyone who signed on would get fired, which is also incredibly illegal and triggered a second class action lmao

[-] nothx@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

The reason it was so high was that the management was told anyone who signed on would get fired, which is also incredibly illegal and triggered a second class action lmao

Holy shit lol. That’s fucking wild.

The whole thing is wild and unsurprising. It’s not to be outdone by the Papa himself being an unrepentant racist drunk.

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

The class actions were filed against the franchisees, not corporate (they knew better and didn't fuck around in the corporate stores). The regional Papa Tsars were Haffaesque in their business practices though.

The one I worked for owned like 40% of PJs on the east coast and all of them in Canada. I did get to de-Pappafy our store when the N-word recording came out though so that was fun. Still have a ton of drunk papa magnets on my fridge and garage door.

[-] miz@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago
[-] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

one time the warehouse/factory i worked at gave everyone a $0.05/hr raise.

This pissed everyone off so bad that we all went in and just told them to take it back.

[-] abies_exarchia@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

no court ever found parkmobile liable for anything

I got tripped up on this. And assumed that it’s actually just a promotion or scam? Why did they send it to me if the court didn’t make them?

[-] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

because it's a settlement and not a court ruling, they signed an agreement with the lawyers that they would compensate the people affected but will not admit fault
that's how most settlements work

[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

A settlement means the issue is put to rest and the claimant can’t sue them again

[-] christian@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

I literally never thought about this before - couldn't there just be a revolving door where legal teams sue and settle for basically nothing, then get lucrative contracts from the company they settled against while the company can't be sued again?

[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It depends. The law firm sues on behalf of a class of affected individuals/entities (i.e. customers who were wronged) but they can’t do that without your permission. Sometimes this permission is implied if you don’t respond to a notice, so it’s opt-out. Sometimes it is opt-in. Not sure about this one, but you do have a choice to decline representation and theoretically pursue your own legal claim since you wouldn’t be bound by the settlement. But in practice, you aren’t gonna be able to successfully sue a large corporation on your own. That’s the point of class-action lawsuits.

I guess in theory a corporation could set up these flimsy settlements as a sort of inoculation against later claims, but I think that wouldn’t really work in practice. They would have to do this for every possible line of complaint, which is near infinite for a sufficiently large organization.

[-] abies_exarchia@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Cool, thanks for the info!

[-] miz@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago
[-] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Whenever I get one of these I always find the email of the lawyer who "won" the case and send them a shitty email. It does nothing but I feel slightly better.

[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

i got this too! i can't wait to spend my $1 in 4 transfer within the next 180 days before it expires!

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
142 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14132 readers
788 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS