623
Anything but metric (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Noja@sopuli.xyz 15 points 6 days ago
[-] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

I'd say that photo and a funny text works much better for warning drivers opposed to information about it's precise dimensions and weight.

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 4 points 6 days ago

For the most charitable reading, that could be a tongue-in-cheek response to someone calling in a large boulder blocking said highway. They arrive and find that the "large" boulder is actually not quite so large.

[-] Aeri@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

I mean if you say corgi-sized asteroid I can instantly visualize it so that's good

[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 6 points 6 days ago

Yeah but how heavy are 4 baby elephants? Is it more like one adult sized one or more like two?

As an American, I need this in F-150s. Base model, curb weight.

[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 4 points 6 days ago

According to my research, a Ford F-150 is approx. one small adult elephant, or 20 baby elephants. A Fiat 500 is about the same weight as four baby elephants.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Not me, not used to corgis. Used to Bernhardiners.

How much corgi is a berhardiner?

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 6 days ago

The late Queen Elizabeth II had her corgis. Coincidence?

[-] courval@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Gotta keep nurturing the idiocracy state

[-] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 2 points 1 week ago
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Is 4 baby elephants less than two grown elephants? And how much is that in football fields?

[-] fnrir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

Nah, I need that in american freedom eagles cubed.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago
[-] Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

Of course there's a community for that

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

The added funny part is that the headline came from an article from a metric using country.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

How would a "corgi-sized" meteor have a mass comparable to "four baby elephants"?

OK. Assuming the corgi is 60cm long, and assuming with "size" they think of "a sphere with a diameter of", we get a volume of 113000cm³. Depending on the weight of a baby elephant (90-120kg) we get 360 to 480 kilograms. Divided by the volume, we get a medium density between 3.1 and 4.2 g/cm³. According to Engineering Toolbox, this is about as dense as garnet or aluminium oxide, common types of stone.

If they took the height of the corgi (30cm) as a base of their spheres' diameter, the volume is down to ~14000cm³, leading to densities between 25.7 and 34.2 g/cm³. Now that would be interesting, because that would even surpass uranium (which has 19.something g/cm³).

So depending on how to interpret those measures, it'll be a ball of dirt, or a serious nuclear threat. That's why scientists use metric...

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 28 points 1 week ago

The article is even very specific about this. It's a Pembroke Welsh Corgi.

For the real numbers:

According to experts from NASA's Johnson Space Center, the meteor in question was just over 60 centimeters in diameter and weighed half a ton (or around 454 kilograms).

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Looks like my estimate is within the parameters.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 12 points 1 week ago

Uhm I mean God knows what they meant, but in this context I visualize this headline as a meteor with the VOLUME of a Corgi, definitely not a sphere with the diameter of the longest dimension of a Corgi, that doesn't make much sense to me.

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago

According to experts from NASA's Johnson Space Center, the meteor in question was just over 60 centimeters in diameter and weighed half a ton (or around 454 kilograms).

https://www.jpost.com/science/article-732223

So, yeah, they meant the diameter. Doesn't make much sense to me either, but then again, I'm not the one making a living writing science-y articles for a definitely non-science audience.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

A corgi has a mass of 10-14kg, so assuming a density of an average mammal of ~1g/cm³ would actually give it a volume of 14000cm³. See paragraph three for results. Not good.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

According to experts from NASA's Johnson Space Center, the meteor in question was just over 60 centimeters in diameter and weighed half a ton (or around 454 kilograms).

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

as heavy as four baby elephants

If they were on the back of a small tortoise, I believe that's 1 micro-Pratchett

[-] Nanook@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

What happened to hamburgers?!?

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

They live and thrive.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

it's a K-shaped economy, we need them for eating not measuring

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

i just did the math and that's something around ~~100,000kg/m^3^ to 200,000kg/m^3^~~ 400,000kg/m^3^ to 860,000kg/m^3^. The densest terrestrial material i could find was Osmium @ 22,610kg/m^3^. The surface of a neutron star is estimated at 1 billion kg/m3. Our star's core density is estimated to be 150,000kg/m^3^. The core of a brown dwarf can be between 10,000kg/m^3^ and 1,000,000kg/m^3^ So, uh.

edit: forgot there were four elephants

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I didn't do the math and realized that was ridiculous density.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

It's just an extra-large corgi, and some extra-light elephants.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Codpiece@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago

If they’ve think corgis are that big, how enormous did they think Queen Elizabeth II was????

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Size ≠ weight.

Meteors tend to be much heavier per cubic centimeter (or half-garlic if we're still avoiding metric) than short-legged dogs or geriatric monarchs.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] remon@ani.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The meteor had a diameter of 60cm, a corgis height is listed as around 30cm (and they are about twice as long as they are high), so it roughly checks out.

[-] Winter_Oven@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

looks at my corgi

sees it smoking a blunt, becoming longer and longer

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Krudler@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I like how the text underneath explains exactly what the viewer is intended to notice and laugh at. Thank god

[-] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Cue the laugh track!

This website says this solid bronze corgi dimensions are Height 15" X Width 24" (38.1cm x 60.96) and weight 22lbs (9.979kg).

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago
[-] dellish@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

With a can for scale. We just need another photo of a can next to a reference banana for full measurement traceability.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
623 points (98.7% liked)

Funny

11926 readers
1427 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS