66
submitted 2 months ago by Grapho@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

That'll solve it

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wondrous_strange@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago

1 nobel peace prize please.

Goddamn fucking americans unbelievable you ruined the entire fucking world with you shit

[-] Grapho@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 months ago

Knowing gringos this'll probably get him some approval points with libs

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago

One is too little.

Our Glorious Leader needs at least three.

Ideally, he'd retroactively get one for each year after his International Debut in Cinema (Home Alone 2)!

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, 1 to tie Obama, one for this year and one to make up for not giving him one

Hey now, America, just like Israel, is a Franco-British creation (with a lot of Germanic folks and culture in them as well). You wanna blame anyone, blame them!

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

Wait, are you blaming the Russia thing on us, or...?

[-] Hestia@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago

Oh, you mean you’re gonna do one of the red lines that Russia put in the sand? You know: the thing Russia was afraid of Ukraine doing if they were to join the UN?

I’m sure this will result in a peaceful resolution.

[-] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What's the game here? The US could give the Ukrainians all of their weapons and they could still never hope to match the Russians. How does any party involved expect people to actually believe they believe this will lead to peace? It's just obvious warmongering for profit.

You don't need to force the Russians to negotiate, they're not the ones that scuttle every round of negotiations. Maybe get a time machine and tell Zelensky not to trust Boris Johnson. Or go back further and replace all the European leadership with people who don't openly treat the Minsk accords as a delaying tactic.

[-] Edie@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

tell Zelensky not to trust Boris Yeltsin

Don't you mean Johnson?

[-] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 13 points 2 months ago

Don't you mean Johnson?

NEVER TRUST A BORIS.

Yes, I did, thank you. I mixed up my evil Borises. i-spil-my-jice Fixed.

[-] Frozentea725@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

The goal is to escalate Ukraine's enialation of Russia's oil processing facilities

[-] huf@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago

that'll be grand, as the russians will then retaliate by even more strikes at ukraine's energy grid. woo yes, let the blood flow!

[-] jack@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago

What the fuck does the US care about Ukraine's energy grid?

[-] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

Well, that's the current level of escalation. Tomahawks are more serious. Contrary to popular belief, the US has been reticent to tread across the red lines given years ago.

Controversial thought, but I've always doubted US willingness to respond to even tactical nuclear weapons if they are used outside of NATO countries.

[-] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

Europeans freezing to death over the winter, self selecting out of the gene pool: yeah you go Ukraine! You teach those RuZZians!

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

annihilation. great try though.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

This is the administration that was trying to court Russia to distance it from China?

this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
66 points (92.3% liked)

World News

38510 readers
438 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS