mediabiasfactcheck.com is useful for it's "factual" measure of sources, but the right-left spectrum is based on what Americans consider "right" and "left" -so what they consider "far left," outside America is probably just "left." They label a lot of international centrist media sources as "left" too. What they consider "least biased" is going to be straight up capitalist.

The key part to recognize is that every position has an inherent bias to it, and just because a particular position happens to be mainstream doesn't make it less biased. Canadian Dimension is on the far left of Canadian politics, however it can be argued that the reason for that is that Canadian political mainstream is biased towards the right.

In general, these labels aren't terribly useful and they're just used to dismiss information without actually engaging with the content. It's much better to point out the cases when reporting is not factual, and to address them specifically regardless of where a source leans politically.

So, if people want to raise disagreements with the content of the article in the submission that's great. However smearing it is just engaging in anti intellectual behavior.

Your insults are so wasted on me that I'm compelled to tell you just how wasted they are. I'm not mad, you're mad.

Nobody except you is triggered here, I'm just pointing out the hilarity of you not being able to understand the concept of a bias. The fact that you see that as an insult makes it all the more hilarious.