183

Mozilla Corporation has named its new CEO in replacing interim CEO Laura Chambers.

Anthony Enzor-DeMeo has been named the new CEO of Mozilla Corporation. Anthony Enzor-DeMeo was SVP of Firefox from 2004 to July 2005 and then from July until now was the GM of Firefox at Mozilla. He's written a public message today in his first day serving as the new chief executive for Mozilla.

Third: Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software. Firefox will remain our anchor. It will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 hours ago

I use LibreWolf and Tor. I don't care what Mozilla does. The garbage will be removed from the forks.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

At what point does removing garbage become so complicated that they just stop merging anything in at all.

[-] varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 9 hours ago

Just in time since 2026 we get the alpha of the ladybird browser. This will be a big boost for the new engines currently in development and the popularity of Librewolf.

[-] DownByLaw@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 hours ago

Ain’t ladybird the browser with project lead Andreas Kling? Well… I don’t know if I wanna be part of that.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

Who is that?

[-] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 97 points 18 hours ago

Well it was fun while it lasted I guess

[-] dinozaur@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 15 hours ago

so long as it's optional, local, and private.

[-] utopiah@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

so long as it’s optional, local, and private.

... yes but also

  • open source,
  • open model,
  • all annotations done with proper respect to
    • labor law (ideally verified by 3rd party)
    • IP
  • clear on ecological cost
    • CO2 eq in model card (ideally verified by 3rd party)
    • analogy non technical user can understand

... which makes for a rather limited list.

My own constraints https://fabien.benetou.fr/Content/CollaborationRelyingOnAI recommendations welcomed, both on such rules but also on models that do fit, if any.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 13 hours ago

I'm sorry, but it's not going to be. Mozilla set the stage of this when they changed from FOSS to source available.

I made this prediction right when this was announced.

[-] oeuf@slrpnk.net 15 points 14 hours ago

The article quotes him as saying:

AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off.

No big deal. If it turns out to be unethical it will be switched off in Librewolf.

[-] monovergent@lemmy.ml 73 points 18 hours ago

Another common mozilla L

[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 6 hours ago
[-] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 16 hours ago

No, Pleaso no, god no

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 36 points 18 hours ago

OK peeps, crowd sourcing time.

What other gecko (or non-webkit) browsers are out there?

[-] SwooshBakery624@programming.dev 35 points 18 hours ago
[-] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 22 points 18 hours ago

Except that *Fox, *Fennec and *Wolf are downstream to Firefox, so if the main trunk goes shit, they will become outdated soon.

[-] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 13 hours ago

You kinda want it to be based on Firefox, as the only other option is chrome. The forks already strip out all the mozilla bullshit, it'll just be more work to strip out all the AI nonsense.

I'm mainly familiar with librewolf, it's not just stripped of nonsense but also hardened by default. Actually so much so that I stayed on Firefox as it was too much effort (so far) to "unharden" all the aspects I didn't want or need.

[-] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

We'll cross that bridge when and if we come to it. Or rather we won't, but the devs behind these projects will.

[-] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

FOSS to thrive needs people who can afford to spend time and energy on it. With the recent enshittification of workers collective power, developers have less of both, and the trend is pessimistic.

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

The answer is, and always has been, unions and strikes.

Do your part.

[-] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago

Are you telling that to someone on a .ml instance?

Huh. :P

(This is of course a joke)

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 17 hours ago

Aren’t these all soft forks of Firefox? What we need is a hard fork with the funding and team capable of sustaining it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] illi@piefed.social 1 points 11 hours ago

Might be I'm dumb, but I don't see any Waterfox downloads for Android?

[-] jwt@programming.dev 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

If you want to sidestep firefox, all firefox descendants would eventually pose the same problem. So I think many options others provided are suboptimal in that regard.

I'm keeping my eyes on ladybird: https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird https://ladybird.org/

But it still is in its early stages.

[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Not gecko but Ladybird is hopefully around the corner. Github

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

Alpha in 2026!

[-] Peffse@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

I had to switch away because of incompatible websites (Cloudflare hates it) but Pale Moon is still hanging around.

Source available here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yaroto98@lemmy.world 29 points 18 hours ago

Ummmmm, what is an AI browser? I mean, other than something I don't want.

Does it browse AI generated content? Does it generate AI web pages for me? Does it just set chatgpt/copilot/grok/gemini as the homepage/default search? Does it use AI to customize content to your language/reading level? Does it flag non-AI content as potentially malicious like an http site?

I'm so lost.

[-] RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz 11 points 17 hours ago

You made me read the Comet browser review, as I did not have the courage to install it myself.

Seems useful if done privately and under supervision:

  • has an AI chat sidebar that can interact with what you're viewing
  • can fill out forms (eg. you can dump unstructured text and have it fill, instead of copying field by field)
  • it can browse the internet for you - you ask it a question and watch it browse pages to find one with an answer
  • it can summarize the currently watched page. Which at first I thought was ridiculous but sometimes you need to get information from shitty bloated articles with 10 paragraphs of introduction

As long as it's optional and done right (eg. It can fill the form but it's me who submits it, and the model is running locally), sounds very useful. Also no reason why it can't be a Firefox addon instead of built in.

[-] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 9 points 18 hours ago

It AI's the AIable content that AI hasn't already AI'd.

[-] curious_dolphin@slrpnk.net 6 points 16 hours ago

yo dawg, I heard you like AI 😆

[-] helix@feddit.org 2 points 13 hours ago

Weird Al Yankovic

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 19 points 18 hours ago

Can they rename the browser to Fireslop?

[-] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

That's a sick burn.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 21 points 18 hours ago

So I'm not ready to burn it all to the ground just yet. Mostly because chromium is still so much worse but also because, at least so far, I can disable that and I understand that "ai is money" for fundraising.

But... anyone have any thoughts on the various forks like waterfox and the other one? I don't mind grabbing the extensions I need on a new install but I DO need a way to be able to send tabs between devices. In theory that is something I can selfhost but I am not aware of a good solution.

[-] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 18 hours ago
[-] yaroto98@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Yea, hopefully downstream browsers can remove that AI garbage.

[-] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 18 hours ago

They have so far.

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

That's actually a decent take on it.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 14 hours ago

Mostly because Mozilla is terrible at achieving its goals, so this will probably result in nothing

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Guess I'm using Links2 now...

[-] gtr@programming.dev 2 points 15 hours ago

Try Dillo. It is what web browsers should have been.

[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

Is it still kicking? Wow, never thought I'd come back to Dillo, Midori, Epyphany (GNOME Web) and links.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
183 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

43392 readers
922 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS