submitted 5 days ago by andros_rex@lemmy.world to c/science_memes@mander.xyz

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 57 points 5 days ago

Hi what the fuck does this mean

[-] oneser@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago

I think the x-axis labels are wrong. Cosine similarity is used to compare vectors in maths. 1 would mean the vectors are going in the same direction and 0 would mean they are going 90° to each other and -1 is opposite.

[-] VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 days ago

While it seems you’re on to something with the x-axis, I do not believe that was the question. My interpretation, that I share, is wtf am I looking at? Haha

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

I found this, which sheds a little more light on the topic?

[-] starik@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

I think it’s a joke about an attempt to formulate the single racial slur that most closely correlates to all slurs at once

[-] starik@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago

So the x-axis should be the same as the y-axis in this case?

How do you calculate the cosine of a slur? Is that the joke?

[-] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 days ago

No, you just use a standard technique like word2vec.

Basically words are considered similar (and embedded to nearby locations in a high dimensional space) if they are likely to be used in the same context.

And because slurs are used to indicate that you don't like someone, they tend to occur in the same kind of context.

So they're all very similar. This is actual natural language processing being used, but it's a shit post and the graphics aren't very clear.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 17 points 5 days ago

The interpretation here depends on the idea of a word-vector. This is a component of language models which treat each individual word in a language as a vector in a pretty high-dimensional space (how high is up to the model author). The way this is usually described is that if you look at the word pairs "man - woman", "boy - girl", "king - queen" and so on, they should differ by a similar vector in word-vector-space, and that vector should correspond to the concept of "male" (or "female" depending on which way round you do it). If you have a word vector model, you should then be able to take the dot product of this gender concept-vector with a word like "actress" or "actor", and see if it has learnt that "actress" is female and "actor" is kinda male but kinda gender neutral due to changing usage.

So what this diagram is showing is a measure of similarity between various word vectors. Those vectors are (the vector of) a slur minus a related word. The idea is to see if subtracting "Mexican" from "spic" leaves you with an underlying concept of "slur" that corresponds to these other vectors - just like with gender and man, woman; boy, girl, etc.

The confusion matrix is actually pretty interesting IMO. There is pretty high similarity between all of the "racial slur - race" vectors, and much less between "cunt - woman" and "fag - homosexual" and the others. So it's showing that there isn't that good a concept - in this word vector model at any rate - of "slur" in general, but you could argue pretty strongly that racial slur does exist in that way.

[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

Why would you make a post about slurs and then censor all of them.

[-] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 days ago

I don't get it at all.

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Imagine modeling the components of a word mathematically. Each word has a value in some number of dimensions, like maybe how negative the word is, or how much it has to do with fruit or something.

You’d be able to calculate a set of eigenvectors to describe each dimension, basically unit vectors. You could have an eigen-name or eigen-compliment, basically just a word that other names or compliments could be expressed in units of that word.

I think 1984’s Newspeak shows some examples of what eigen-words could be. Stuff like “doublepluscold.”

[-] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

Ok, I'm a physicist so math is fine. I just couldn't get the diagram. Thanks!

[-] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Is the first one 'South Mexican'?

Then we've got 'Crumbly Chinese'

'Fucking homosexuals' (nice)

'No African' (rude)

'Clever Woman'

'Kill Jewish? Kippah Jewish? Kangaroo Jewish?'

And obviously, the 'Jolly Japanese'

[-] breezeblock@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 days ago

Spic Chink Fag Cunt Kyke Jap

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago

I haven't heard anyone use "Jap" outside my grandfather's generation — and he fought a fucking war against them so no surprise he had some big feels there. But he's also been dead about 25 years and I've never heard the word since.

But also I don't hang out with racists, so what do I know.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

I once met a Chinese girl who was somewhat suspiciously fond of the English slang term (that I hadn't heard of) "Jap's Eye" which apparently means "urethral opening" and tbf I would never use the latter term either...

OTOH I had heard the term from time to time and it always came across to me (not Japanese - important caveat) as a pretty mild one, like "frog" for the French. I would be very unsurprised if it were different in the USA though, where there was such a big impact from WW2 and internment.

[-] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

How have I lived with a Jewish family all my life and never heard 'Kyke', yet I was well aware of 'Faggot' after only knowing about gay people for much less time?

[-] breezeblock@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

Humans are a mysterious race.

“F….., f….., f….., we can say it together — but only if you let a white girl say n…..”

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Honestly most of these are out of fashion anyway

[-] verdare@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 days ago

Aren’t the x-axis labels wrong? If I’m interpreting this correctly, the x and y axes labels should be the same. That might be partly why people are getting confused.