52
He really is Hitler brained.
Poor guy wants to see his name on everything and the biggest boat with biggest guns would be his favorite.
Goddamn his parents should have taken him to a psych hospital
Now we just have to get him in a bunker with nowhere else to go
And make memes with funny subtitles.
Rule of law in this land now: "Trump-class" anything is coded for "kickback-funneling-class" - it's never going to exist for it's stated mission, only for the explicit mission of funneling money around.
Amazing isn't it? Trump is the epitome of failure, but only at the mercy of other people. You gotta hand it to the piece of shit, he is an incredible grifter. He's managed to convince an entire Top Three nation to let him do whatever the fuck he wants. He's getting away with unspeakable crimes; pedophilia, rape, possibly murder... etc. The world's worst human being running freely, in the most powerful position in the world, and a cult of personality. Just amazingly terrible.
Yup, same as it's always been. I find solace in his big mad though:
- Wants to be beloved by all Americans; will never be loved by even half of Americans.
- Desperately wants to preserve his legacy; there is no future where his legacy isn't tarnished.
- Craves being the richest, most successful 'business' man in the world; every business launched ended in failure or prosecution.
- Tries to project emotional strength and fortitudinous; late-night comedians live rent free in what's left of his brain.
the true enemy of all conservatives
America is never recovering from this shit show.
Very likely not quite, yeah. But honestly that's ok. The US was too important. We need a little less responsibility and a little less pull. We need a little humble dealt to us.
Imagine thinking of the US's interference globally as responsibility
It's going to take, minimum, 10 years to build, right? And that's not counting any design, planning, and other ships that may be in progress at our shipyards. He's never going to see it. So let's just tell him we're building it, and not.
Honestly, if I was some admiral trying to protect a bunch of R&D projects in development from Trump, I'd probably wrap as many of them as I could into a pitch for a big battleship with his name on it then spend the entire budget on the technologies that are supposedly going into the ship. Put basically no effort into the ship itself, just show him concept art and maybe send him a model or something to make him think progress is being made.
What do ya reckon they are doing
That is what they're going to do .... but in the meantime they'll send a shit ton of money his way for the project.
Battleships cannot exist for there is no armor that can survive modern weapons. You cannot brawl it out against a bomb run and your weapons fire only 100km at best.
It is excellent for blasting away at a shoreline when you have absolute air and naval control. For reducing a defenseless region to rubble without using expensive (and anonymous) missiles or planes.
"And in today's news, the USS Trump has shelled the deserted remains of Caracas for the 3rd day running."
It is excellent for blasting away at a shoreline when you have absolute air and naval control.
Even in the battleship era, they had better ships for shore bombardment called "monitors" (after the Civil War-era ships named after USS Monitor that looked similar even though that wasn't their purpose). A shallow-draft ship just large enough to hold a single battleship turret was a much more economical solution.
If it does get made I hope it sinks faster than the Vasa
Like, the navy hasn't used battleships in decades because they are obsolete to deystroyers, that kind of obstacle?
really what we need are destroyer sized drone platforms anyways.
With future weaponry they might see a come back
These extremely high powered laser weapons need large battery banks which seem to be usable as a power source for railguns too. Big boats might make sense, and with laser weapons mostly obsoleting air attacks they'd be a lot less of a sitting duck
You know Iran has AI torpedo drones, right? They're called Valfajr torpedos.
And more exotic ideas:
Anyone actually paying attention to Iran will tell you that "bigger is better" Trump ideas are just giant floating "sink me" signs compared to fast, easy to produce swarms of smart explosives.
Yeah the next generation of serious combat will probably be significantly influenced by who has the best underwater capabilities, unless someone builds some kind of flying fortress for laser attacks and air denial
Personally, I think a "battleship" designed solely for coastal bombardment duties would be the best fit for a modernized version. A Siege Ship, I guess? Provided the artillery shells are cheap, they can be constantly lobbed with great range and power at stationary targets. This would free up expensive missiles and aircraft for tasks beyond the reach or accuracy of the artillery.
How could a large incredibly expensive slow moving warship that's really easy to locate and follow possibly be a bad idea? It's not like you can quickly, cheaply, and easily cram a bunch of explosives in a few unnamed submersibles and sink those ships for a fraction of the cost, right?
Vasa (previously Wasa) (Swedish pronunciation: [²vɑːsa] ⓘ) is a Swedish warship built between 1626 and 1628. The ship sank after sailing roughly 1,300 m (1,400 yd) into her maiden voyage on 10 August 1628.
[...]
The ship was built on the orders of the King of Sweden Gustavus Adolphus as part of the military expansion he initiated in a war with Poland-Lithuania (1621–1629). It was constructed at the navy yard in Stockholm under a contract with private entrepreneurs in 1626–1627 and armed primarily with bronze cannons cast in Stockholm specifically for the ship. Richly decorated as a symbol of the king's ambitions for Sweden and himself, upon completion she was one of the most powerfully armed vessels in the world. However, Vasa was dangerously unstable, with too much weight in the upper structure of the hull. Despite this lack of stability, she was ordered to sea and sank only a few minutes after encountering a wind stronger than a breeze.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasa_(ship)
fuktig mejmej
This is all I can think about.
Remember the ~~Alamo~~ Yamato!
Okay but what does a really good space anime have to do with Trump's delusions?
Wait actually I can kind of see it.
In case you're not kidding, it was a real battleship - practically useless due to it's size and cost, it only fired it's main guns in one engagement (and it's only arguable that they did anything) and spent the rest of the war as a command ship or scuttling between ports attempting to hide from enemy aircraft. It was ultimately sunk on it's way to a suicide mission by allied bombers.
I knew there was a real ship but I had no idea how useless it actually was.
Better yet, there were two ships in the class. Yamato's sister ship, Musashi suffered a very similar fate, though.
I bet if Trump stays in power long enough he will inevitably demand that it is painted gold.
Key Points: Never stopped him before.
Every word makes sense but ...... It does not matter. It needs to be big, it must have (the illusion) of impressive and it has to carry his name.
Such an insecure little boy that late 70s man is.
i'm just surprised he hasn't started building his ~~washington~~ krasnov monument [below] that is right next to washington's girthy stately vigorous phallic protrusion.
Literally the only thing this has going for it is how much of the world would be united in support of watching the USS Donnie Dotard sink into the ocean depths where it is crushed beyond all recognition.
This thing is getting a proper announcement on Monday, right?
I'm actually really curious to see what the Navy thinks the role and function of a modern battleship should be.
Especially with the designs coming out of China focusing on missile and especially drone launching capabilities, I wonder if ONR will go the same way or if they have a different vision for the future of capital warships.
The article mentions the Navy saying it wants to focus on distributing naval assets across many smaller vessels, and that seems far more sound in an era where an autonomous naval drone can pack enough punch to take down a massive vessel and can be launched in swarms. I'm not sure what the value of massive vessels are in a world where that exists. Would it be capable of launching its own drone fleet of screening ships? Is it a massive EWAR platform? Does it even have guns? I dunno. I wanna see though.
I'm actually really curious to see what the Navy thinks the role and function of a modern battleship should be.
A coral reef, probably. There's a reason battleships aren't made anymore. Moron might as well be boasting were going to make the biggest bestest most bigliest Ironclads the world has ever seen.
You know he just decided that "we should have battleships" because he doesn't know why we don't, and if he doesn't know why, then there must be no reason.
this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
52 points (98.1% liked)
politics
27107 readers
459 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS